PYQ Browser›Indian Polity›Case-Study / Applied Scenario
⚖️ Indian Polity3 PYQs

Indian Polity: Case-Study / Applied Scenario PYQ.

UPSC Prelims Indian Polity previous year questions in the "Case-Study / Applied Scenario" question pattern — real questions with answers and explanations.

3 questions · sorted by year
2026Case-Study / Applied ScenarioPublic Administration & Ethics

Mr. X, a senior officer, was overseeing a critical vaccination programme during a pandemic. He found that a private service provider responsible for vaccine distribution was compromising on quality to make profits. Despite immense pressure to manage the issue due to vested interests, he raised his voice based on the principles of public administration which he learnt during various training programmes attended across his career. He reported the issue to the appropriate vigilance authority and halted the contract to ensure citizen welfare. Which one among the following principles of public administration was most strongly demonstrated by Mr. X's actions?

A.Esprit de corps
B.Equity
C.Accountability
D.Delegation
Explanation: * (c) Accountability is correct: Mr. X's firm decision to expose corruption to the vigilance authority and cancel the compromised contract demonstrates accountability. * Accountability dictates that public administrators must remain answerable for their actions, choices, and ethical results, prioritizing public welfare and safety over vested political or outside pressures. * Other choices are incorrect: Esprit de corps is organizational team unity, equity is impartial treatment, and delegation is passing authority to lower ranks.
Select an option to reveal the answer
📌 Lokpal, Lokayuktas & NIARelevance 85%
2026Case-Study / Applied ScenarioPublic Administration & Ethics

In a multi-ethnic district where both economic competition and historical grievances frequently led to community tensions, a flashpoint has arisen with a Government decision to allocate land for a waste management facility near a tribal hamlet, sparking protests by the tribal community, which claimed that the land was sacred and critical to their cultural identity. At the same time, urban residents and local industries supported the project, citing severe solid waste challenges and health concerns due to lack of a proper disposal site. The conflict has escalated with road blockades, social media campaigns, and allegations of police excesses. As a responsible Government official, you are tasked with resolving the situation through mediation, ensuring a sustainable outcome that balances environmental needs, tribal rights, and urban public health. Consider the following statements with reference to the above: 1. A successful conflict resolution process must begin with acknowledging the cultural concerns of the protesting tribal community before discussing technical alternatives. 2. The Government should move ahead with the project without delay to address urban health concerns, which outweigh the sentiments of a small group. 3. Creating a multi-stakeholder dialogue platform - including tribal leaders, environmental experts, and municipal representatives - to build mutual understanding and help de-escalate tensions. 4. Conducting an independent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) and sharing findings transparently with both sides to facilitate evidence-based decision-making. Which of the statements given above would contribute to the resolution process?

A.1, 3 and 4 only
B.2, 3 and 4 only
C.1 and 2 only
D.1, 2, 3 and 4
Explanation: * Statement 1 is correct: Conflict resolution in delicate ethnic disputes must start by acknowledging the cultural, emotional, and ancestral land concerns of the tribal group to lay a foundation of trust. * Statement 2 is incorrect: Pushing the project forward while disregarding tribal claims as a "small group" violates natural justice, participatory governance, and specific tribal protection acts (FRA 2006, PESA 1996). It will deepen rather than resolve the crisis. * Statement 3 is correct: Setting up an inclusive multi-stakeholder platform helps build common understanding and lowers active public friction. * Statement 4 is correct: Executing an independent, transparent Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) helps use neutral facts to guide a balanced solution.
Select an option to reveal the answer
📌 Lokpal, Lokayuktas & NIARelevance 65%
2026Case-Study / Applied ScenarioPublic Administration & Ethics

Ms. X is a mid-level civil service official working in the urban development department of a major city. Recently, she was involved in approving a contract for a public infrastructure project - a new community park. During the approval process, she received a piece of confidential information indicating that one of the shortlisted contractors had a history of poor workmanship and allegations of corruption in other cities, though nothing had been legally proven. The Head of the Department, Mr. Y, advised her not to disclose this information to the project committee or the public because it could delay the project and damage the city's reputation. However, Ms. X believed that withholding such information compromised transparency and public trust. What amongst the following should Ms. X do now? 1. Immediately disclose the information to the project committee and the public 2. Recommend removing the contractor from the shortlist to protect the project's integrity 3. Propose a 'limited disclosure' to an oversight committee, while keeping the information confidential from the public for the time being

A.1 and 2 only
B.3 only
C.2 and 3 only
D.1, 2 and 3
Explanation: * Statement 1 is inappropriate: Publicly disclosing unverified and unproven rumors breaks the principles of natural justice and leaves the department open to defamation or legal liability. * Statement 2 is inappropriate: Unilaterally blacklisting or removing a contractor based on unverified allegations bypasses due administrative process. * Statement 3 is correct: Making a limited disclosure to an internal oversight or vigilance committee ensures that relevant background checks can occur legally. This choice maintains procedural fairness, protects necessary confidentiality until facts are proven, and honors Ms. X's ethical duty of integrity without yielding to political suppression.
Select an option to reveal the answer
📌 National IntegrationRelevance 95%
Other patterns in Indian Polity

All Indian Polity PYQs + Similar Questions

Full question bank with explanations and unlimited AI-generated practice questions — in the free app.

↓ Get on AndroidiOS coming soon