Q1.Consider the following statements regarding the estimation of poverty in India:
1. The Planning Commission is the current nodal authority for publishing official poverty estimates.
2. Poverty estimates are presently compiled by the National Statistical Office (NSO).
3. The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) is responsible for conducting the sample surveys used for poverty estimation in India.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Planning Commission was the previous authority for publishing poverty estimates; this role is no longer held by it. Statement 2 is correct. The poverty estimates are currently compiled by the National Statistical Office (NSO), which operates under the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. Statement 3 is incorrect. The sample surveys for poverty estimation were conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO), which is now part of the NSO. The UNDP's role mentioned in the context of the IBSA fund is managing that specific fund, not conducting India's national poverty surveys.
TextbookHard
Q2.Consider the following statements regarding types of poverty:
1. Poverty that is passed down from one generation to the next, persisting for two or more generations, is termed Situational Poverty.
2. A person falling below the poverty line due to a sudden event like a natural disaster or unemployment is an example of Generational Poverty.
3. The concept of a 'poverty line' is used as a method to measure Absolute Poverty.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Poverty that is passed down for two or more generations is defined as Generational Poverty, not Situational Poverty. Statement 2 is incorrect. Poverty caused by a sudden event like a disaster or unemployment is the definition of Situational Poverty, not Generational Poverty. Statement 3 is correct. Absolute poverty, which is deprivation from basic needs, is measured using the concept of a poverty line, representing a minimum income or consumption level.
TextbookHard
Q3.Consider the following two statements:
**Statement-I:** The Rangarajan Committee's methodology for poverty estimation was based on the monthly expenditure of a family unit of five, rather than on an individual basis.
**Statement-II:** The primary reason for adopting a family-unit approach was to establish a single, uniform poverty line for the entire country, thereby eliminating the need for state-specific adjustments based on price levels.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The Rangarajan Committee's method explicitly based its poverty calculation on the monthly expenditure of a family of five. Statement-II is incorrect. Poverty lines in India are not uniform and are adjusted to account for different price levels prevailing in different states. The choice of a family unit as the basis for calculation is a methodological decision about the unit of analysis, and it does not imply the creation of a single, unadjusted national poverty line. Therefore, Statement-II does not provide a correct reason for Statement-I and is factually incorrect on its own.
TextbookHard
Q4.Consider the following statements regarding poverty measurement indices:
1. The Head Count Ratio (HCR) is primarily used to measure the intensity of poverty by calculating the average shortfall from the poverty line.
2. The Poverty Gap Ratio helps determine the degree of poverty by squaring the shortfalls of BPL people, thereby giving more weight to the very poor.
3. The Squared Poverty Gap Index indicates the percentage of the population living below the poverty line.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Head Count Ratio (HCR) measures the *incidence* of poverty, not its intensity. It indicates the percentage of people living Below the Poverty Line (BPL). The measure for the average shortfall from the poverty line is the Poverty Gap Ratio.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The measure that squares the shortfalls to give more weight to the very poor is the *Squared Poverty Gap Index*, not the Poverty Gap Ratio. The Poverty Gap Ratio measures the average shortfall from the poverty line.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The index that indicates the percentage of the population living below the poverty line is the *Head Count Ratio (HCR)*, also known as the poverty incidence ratio. The Squared Poverty Gap Index measures the degree or severity of poverty, particularly for the poorest individuals.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q5.Consider the following statements regarding the Multi-Dimensional Poverty Index (MPI):
1. The MPI concept was developed by the World Bank to measure 'extreme' poverty, replacing the Human Poverty Index.
2. A person is considered multi-dimensionally poor if they are deprived in at least one-half of the weighted indicators.
3. In India, the National Multidimensional Poverty Index (NMPI) is released by NITI Aayog based on data from the National Sample Survey (NSS).
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The MPI concept was developed by the UN Development Programme (UNDP) and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). It measures 'acute' poverty, which is distinct from the World Bank's measure of 'extreme' poverty.
Statement 2 is incorrect. A person is considered multi-dimensionally poor if they are deprived in at least *one-third* (a cut-off of 33.33%) of the weighted indicators, not one-half.
Statement 3 is incorrect. While the NMPI is released by NITI Aayog, it is based on the National Family Health Survey (NFHS), specifically NFHS-4 for the initial report, not the National Sample Survey (NSS).
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q6.Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: In the Multi-Dimensional Poverty Index (MPI), the three dimensions of Education, Health, and Standard of Living are assigned equal weightage.
Statement-II: Within the MPI framework, each indicator under the Education and Health dimensions carries three times the weight of any single indicator under the Standard of Living dimension.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The MPI framework is built on three dimensions. The Education dimension has a total weight of 1/3 (1/6 for Years of Schooling + 1/6 for School Attendance). The Health dimension has a total weight of 1/3 (1/6 for Child Mortality + 1/6 for Nutrition). The Standard of Living dimension has six indicators, each with a weight of 1/18, for a total weight of 6 * (1/18) = 6/18 = 1/3. Thus, all three dimensions have equal total weightage of 1/3.
Statement-II is also correct. An indicator in the Education or Health dimension has a weight of 1/6. An indicator in the Standard of Living dimension has a weight of 1/18. The ratio is (1/6) / (1/18) = 18/6 = 3. Therefore, an Education/Health indicator has three times the weight of a Standard of Living indicator.
Statement-II provides the mathematical reason for how the dimensional weights are constructed, thus correctly explaining Statement-I. The specific weighting of individual indicators is what leads to the equal weighting of the overall dimensions.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q7.Consider the following statements regarding poverty estimation methodologies in India:
1. The Uniform Reference Period (URP) method collects consumption data for five specific non-food items over a 365-day period and for all other items over a 30-day period.
2. The Rangarajan Committee recommended using the Modified Mixed Reference Period (MMRP) method for poverty estimation.
3. Poverty estimates derived using the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) method are consistently higher than those derived using the URP method.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. It describes the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) method, not the Uniform Reference Period (URP) method. The URP method collects consumption data for ALL items over a 30-day recall period. Statement 2 is correct. The Rangarajan Committee's 2014 report recommended MMRP as a more suitable method to measure poverty compared to URP and MRP. Statement 3 is incorrect. Poverty estimates using the MRP method are lower than those using the URP method. The URP method yields the highest poverty estimates among the three methodologies (URP, MRP, MMRP).
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q8.With reference to the Tendulkar and Rangarajan Committees on poverty estimation, consider the following statements:
1. The Tendulkar Committee used the Modified Mixed Reference Period (MMRP) method, whereas the Rangarajan Committee used the Mixed Reference Period (MRP) method.
2. The Tendulkar Committee used separate poverty line baskets for rural and urban areas, while the Rangarajan Committee used a uniform all-India urban poverty line basket.
3. For the year 2011-12, the all-India poverty ratio derived using the Rangarajan methodology was higher than the ratio derived using the Tendulkar methodology.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The methodologies are swapped. The Tendulkar Committee used the MRP method, while the Rangarajan Committee used the MMRP method. Statement 2 is incorrect. The roles are reversed. The Tendulkar Committee used a uniform urban poverty line basket for both rural and urban areas, whereas the Rangarajan Committee used separate rural and urban poverty line baskets. Statement 3 is correct. For the year 2011-12, the poverty ratio as per the Rangarajan methodology was 29.5%, which is higher than the 21.9% ratio derived using the Tendulkar methodology.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q9.Consider the following two statements:
Statement-I: The Suresh Tendulkar Committee did not construct a new poverty line; instead, it adopted the officially measured urban poverty line of 2004–05 based on the Lakdawala methodology and adjusted it.
Statement-II: The Tendulkar Committee's methodology was a continuation of the Lakdawala Committee's approach, as it also used the Uniform Reference Period (URP) for consumption data and excluded private expenditure on health and education.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The Tendulkar Committee adopted the urban poverty line of 2004-05 which was based on the Lakdawala methodology. Statement-II is incorrect. The Tendulkar Committee marked a significant departure from the Lakdawala approach. It converted the poverty line consumption from the Uniform Reference Period (URP) to the Mixed Reference Period (MRP). Furthermore, it explicitly included private expenditure on health and education in its poverty estimation, which was not done by the Lakdawala Committee. Therefore, Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookMedium
Q10.Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of poverty estimation in India:
1. The Y.K. Alagh Task Force established different daily calorie intake norms for rural and urban areas to estimate poverty.
2. The D.T. Lakdawala Committee recommended the use of state-specific poverty lines.
3. The shift from a consumption expenditure-based poverty line to an income-based poverty line is recommended because consumption patterns are more irregular than income for most households.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. The Y.K. Alagh Task Force fixed calorie intake at 2,400 per capita per day for rural areas and 2,100 for urban areas, justifying it by the higher physical work in rural areas. Statement 2 is correct. The Lakdawala Committee report recommended state-specific poverty lines, which were to be updated using CPI (Agricultural Labour) for rural areas and CPI (Industrial Worker) for urban areas. Statement 3 is incorrect. The NSSO estimates poverty based on consumption expenditure precisely because income is irregular for a majority of households, whereas their consumption patterns are comparatively stable. The statement inverts this logic.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q11.Consider the following statements regarding committees for the identification of Below Poverty Line (BPL) families in India:
1. The N.C. Saxena Committee was constituted by the Ministry of Rural Development to recommend a methodology for conducting the BPL Census in urban areas.
2. The S.R. Hashim Committee recommended a three-stage identification process, including automatic exclusion and inclusion, for BPL families in rural areas.
3. A key recommendation of the N.C. Saxena Committee was to revise the percentage of people entitled to BPL status in India to at least 50 per cent.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The N.C. Saxena Committee was constituted by the Ministry of Rural Development (MoRD) to advise on a methodology for the BPL Census in rural areas, not urban areas. Statement 2 is incorrect. The S.R. Hashim Committee was appointed by the Ministry of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation, and its recommended three-stage process was for urban areas, not rural areas. Statement 3 is correct. The N.C. Saxena Committee's 2009 report did recommend that the percentage of people entitled to BPL status be revised to at least 50 per cent. Therefore, only one statement is correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q12.Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The Sen Index of Poverty offers a more comprehensive measure than the simple Head Count Ratio by accounting for the level of inequality among the poor.
Statement-II: The mathematical formulation of the Sen Index incorporates the Gini Coefficient, a standard measure of statistical dispersion intended to represent income or wealth inequality.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The Sen Index was developed to overcome the limitations of simpler measures like the Head Count Ratio by also considering the extent and severity of poverty, as well as the level of inequality. Statement-II is also correct. The formula for the Sen Index is S = H [I + (1-I) G], where 'G' represents the Gini Coefficient, a measure of inequality. Statement-II provides the precise mechanism through which the Sen Index achieves the objective mentioned in Statement-I, thus making it the correct explanation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookMedium
Q13.With reference to Amartya Sen's Capability Approach, consider the following statements:
1. It primarily encourages the expansion of government welfare programs to enhance people's well-being.
2. It has been criticized for being overly collectivistic and ignoring individual agency.
3. It posits that development should be viewed as a process of creating an enabling atmosphere for people to achieve valuable functioning.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The capability approach does not encourage welfare programs; instead, it advocates for empowerment initiatives to expand people's capabilities. Statement 2 is incorrect. The approach has been criticized for the opposite reason – for being 'individualistic', not collectivistic. Statement 3 is correct. The approach defines development as creating an environment where people have the freedom and capability to pursue what they value and achieve valuable functioning. Therefore, only one statement is correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q14.Consider the following statements regarding Universal Basic Income (UBI):
1. UBI is designed with a means test to ensure that payments are targeted only to individuals below a certain income threshold.
2. The disbursement of cash payments under UBI is conditional upon the fulfillment of a work requirement by the recipient.
3. The Economic Survey 2016-17 estimated that implementing UBI would cost more than the total expenditure on all existing welfare schemes combined.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. A core hallmark of UBI is 'Universality', meaning it is delivered to everyone on an individual basis without a means test. Targeted payments are a feature of other welfare schemes, not UBI. Statement 2 is incorrect. Another core hallmark of UBI is 'Unconditionality', which means the payment is delivered without any work requirement. Conditional cash transfers require recipients to meet certain criteria, but UBI does not. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Economic Survey 2016-17 estimated that UBI would involve expenditure of around 4.9% of GDP, which was lower than the then-current expenditure of 5.2% of GDP on all welfare schemes taken together.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q15.Consider the following two statements:
Statement-I: A primary rationale for Universal Basic Income (UBI) is its potential to replace a large number of existing welfare schemes, thereby simplifying administration and reducing leakages.
Statement-II: The successful implementation of a nationwide UBI scheme is considered to be contingent upon a pre-existing and effectively functional JAM (Jan Dhan, Aadhar, Mobile) infrastructure.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. A key argument for UBI is that it could replace numerous welfare schemes (around 950 mentioned), which would simplify monitoring and overcome implementation leakages. Statement-II is also correct. A functional JAM trinity is identified as a pre-requisite for the effective delivery of UBI to a large population. However, Statement-II does not explain Statement-I. The reason UBI simplifies administration (Statement-I) is because it consolidates many schemes into a single one. The JAM trinity (Statement-II) is the technological and financial infrastructure for *delivering* the payment, not the reason *why* the policy itself is administratively simpler. Therefore, both statements are correct, but one is not the explanation for the other.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q16.With reference to income inequality, consider the following statements:
1. Political instability in a nation is a primary cause of rising income inequality.
2. High inflation in goods and services is a measure taken by the government to combat income inequality.
3. A progressive taxation system under direct tax is a measure taken by the government to combat income inequality.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The provided text lists political instability as an 'Impact of Income Inequality', not a cause. Statement 2 is incorrect. The text identifies 'High Inflation in goods and services' as a 'Cause of Income Inequality', not a measure taken to combat it. Statement 3 is correct. The text explicitly lists 'Progressive taxation system under direct tax' as one of the 'Measures taken by the Government to combat Income Inequality'. Therefore, only one statement is correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q17.Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: A focus on capital-intensive ways of production is identified as a cause of income inequality.
Statement-II: Promoting labour-intensive sectors is a suggested measure to reduce income inequality.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The text explicitly lists 'More focus on capital-intensive ways of production' as a cause of income inequality. Statement-II is also correct. The text includes 'Promoting inclusive growth by encouraging labour-intensive sectors' as a suggested measure to reduce inequality. However, Statement-II is a proposed solution or a counter-measure to the problem identified in Statement-I; it does not explain *why* a focus on capital-intensive production causes inequality. An explanation would detail the mechanism, whereas Statement-II presents a policy alternative. Therefore, both statements are correct, but Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookMedium
Q18.Consider the following statements regarding measures to combat income inequality:
1. The government uses the MRTP Act as the primary legislation to control monopolies and restrictive trade practices.
2. Re-introducing inheritance tax is a suggested measure to reduce inequality by taxing the super-rich.
3. Employment generation schemes like MGNREGA are a measure taken by the government to combat income inequality.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, 1969, was repealed and replaced by the Competition Act, 2002. The Competition Act is the current primary legislation to control monopolies and anti-competitive practices. Statement 2 is correct. Re-introducing inheritance tax is a fiscal policy tool frequently proposed to reduce wealth concentration and inter-generational inequality by taxing large inheritances. Statement 3 is correct. Employment generation schemes, such as the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), aim to provide a basic income floor and reduce poverty, which are key strategies to combat income inequality. Since only two statements are correct, the correct option is b.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q19.Consider the following statements regarding the measurement of income inequality:
1. The Lorenz Curve is a mathematical measure of income inequality, while the Gini Coefficient is its graphical representation.
2. A Gini Coefficient value of 1 represents a state of perfect equality, where every resident has the same income.
3. The Hoover Index is equal to the percentage of the total population's income that would have to be redistributed to achieve perfect income equality.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The text specifies that income inequality is measured through the Gini Coefficient in mathematical terms and the Lorenz curve in graphical terms. The statement reverses these roles. Statement 2 is incorrect. The text states that a Gini Coefficient of 0 represents perfect equality, while a value of 1 indicates perfect inequality. The statement incorrectly associates the value of 1 with perfect equality. Statement 3 is correct. The text defines the Hoover index as being 'equal to the percentage of the total population's income that would have to be redistributed to make all the incomes equal.' Therefore, only one statement is correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q20.Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: An increase in a country's Gini Coefficient from 0.29 to 0.36 indicates a worsening of income distribution.
Statement-II: As the Gini Coefficient increases, the Lorenz curve moves closer to the line of perfect equality.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. The provided text explicitly states, 'an increase in value from 0.29 to 0.36 indicates more income inequality, which is certainly not good for an economy.' This implies a worsening of income distribution. Statement-II is incorrect. The text explains, 'The closer is the Lorenz curve to the perfect equality line, the less is the level of income inequality and vice versa.' Therefore, an increase in the Gini Coefficient, which signifies higher inequality, would mean the Lorenz curve moves *further away* from the line of perfect equality, not closer to it. Since Statement-II is factually incorrect, it cannot be the explanation for Statement-I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q21.Consider the following statements regarding wealth and income inequality:
1. The real growth rate of average income in India was higher during the period 1960-1990 as compared to 1990-2022.
2. The World Inequality Report 2022 identifies Europe as the world's most unequal region based on the income share of the top 10 percent.
3. Among major economies such as the UK, France, China, US, India, Brazil, and South Africa, India has the second-highest concentration of wealth with its top 1% population.
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The real growth rate of average income in India was 1.6% per annum between 1960 and 1990, which is lower than the 3.6% per annum growth rate observed between 1990 and 2022.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The World Inequality Report 2022 identifies the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) as the world's most unequal region, not Europe. In fact, Europe is considered the most equal region, with its top 10% having an income share of 36%.
Statement 3 is incorrect. Among the major economies mentioned, both South Africa (where the top 1% holds 54.6% of wealth) and Brazil (where the top 1% holds 48.7%) exhibit a higher concentration of wealth in their top 1% population compared to India (40.1%). This places India third, not second, in this group.
Since all three statements are incorrect, the correct option is (d).
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
TextbookHard
Q22.With reference to reports on inequality in India, consider the following statements:
1. The UNDP's 2023/24 report on Human Development concluded that income inequality in India today is worse than it was during the British rule.
2. The World Inequality Lab report highlights that the share of adults filing income tax returns in India has grown to 9% in the last decade, up from below 1% until the 1990s.
3. According to the World Inequality Lab, the wealth share of India's top 1% has more than tripled between 1961 and 2023.
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The finding that income inequality in India today is worse than during the British rule is from the 'World Inequality Report 2022', not the UNDP report. The UNDP report is cited for the reduction in the Income Gini Coefficient.
Statement 2 is correct. The World Inequality Lab report explicitly states that until the 1990s, below 1% of adults filed a tax return, and this share has grown to 9% in the last decade (particularly between 2017 and 2022).
Statement 3 is incorrect. The report states that the wealth accumulation of the top 1% increased from 13% in 1961 to 39% in 2023. This represents an exact tripling (13% * 3 = 39%), not 'more than' a tripling.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q23.With reference to poverty alleviation strategies and estimation methodologies in India, consider the following statements:
1. The 'graduation approach' to poverty alleviation, pioneered in India, primarily focuses on providing conditional cash transfers to ultra-poor families.
2. The first systematic assessment of poverty in post-independence India, which utilized National Sample Survey (NSS) data, was conducted by the Dandekar and Rath Committee.
3. Currently, the official poverty estimates in India are compiled and released by the NITI Aayog.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The 'graduation approach' was pioneered by the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee (BRAC) and is a comprehensive model, not limited to cash transfers. It integrates social protection, livelihood promotion, and financial inclusion. Statement 2 is correct. The Dandekar and Rath Committee (1971) was the first to systematically assess poverty in India using National Sample Survey (NSS) consumption expenditure data. Statement 3 is incorrect. Official poverty estimates based on consumption expenditure are compiled by the National Statistical Office (NSO), not the NITI Aayog.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q24.With reference to the recent trends in household consumption expenditure in India, consider the following statements:
1. The gap between rural and urban monthly per capita consumption expenditure has widened.
2. The proportion of expenditure on food items in the total consumption basket has decreased in both rural and urban areas.
3. Consumption inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, has increased in both rural and urban sectors.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. Recent survey data indicates that rural consumption has grown faster than urban consumption, leading to a narrowing of the gap between them. Statement 2 is incorrect. The latest survey shows a reversal of previous trends, with the share of expenditure on food items increasing in both rural and urban households. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Gini coefficient for consumption has decreased in both rural and urban areas, indicating a reduction in consumption inequality.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q25.With reference to the concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) in the context of the Indian economy, consider the following statements:
1. Implementation of a Universal Basic Income, by boosting aggregate demand, is likely to decrease the overall inflationary pressures in the economy.
2. A key rationale for UBI is to replace the administrative complexities and leakages associated with multiple in-kind subsidy schemes.
3. The 'universality' principle of UBI implies that payments are made only to individuals below a designated poverty line, excluding others.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. A large-scale cash transfer like UBI increases the purchasing power of a vast population, boosting aggregate demand. This is more likely to fuel demand-pull inflation, not decrease it, especially if supply does not expand commensurately. Statement 2 is correct. UBI is often proposed as a streamlined alternative to the complex web of existing welfare schemes, aiming to reduce administrative costs, corruption, and leakages by providing direct cash transfers. Statement 3 is incorrect. The principle of 'universality' means the income is provided to all citizens, irrespective of their economic status or employment. A scheme targeting only those below the poverty line is a targeted benefit, not a universal one.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q26.With reference to the evolving political economy, consider the following statements regarding the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on state-capital relations:
Statement-I: The proliferation of AI technologies tends to make capital more territorially anchored and infrastructure-dependent, reversing the trend of 'footloose' capital seen in earlier globalization phases.
Statement-II: This shift incentivizes a closer alliance between the state and capital, driven by imperatives of national security and the development of sovereign technological capabilities.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement-I is correct. Unlike mobile financial capital, AI is infrastructure-heavy (data centers, chips), anchoring it to specific territories. Statement-II is also correct. Because AI infrastructure is critical for economic and national security, states partner with large firms to build it, leading to a closer state-capital alliance. The imperatives mentioned in Statement-II provide the rationale for why the state actively engages with and reinforces the anchoring of capital described in Statement-I, making it a correct explanation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q27.Consider the following statements regarding economic inequality in India:
1. Post-liberalization, the real growth rate of average income has been consistently lower than the pre-liberalization period.
2. The share of national wealth held by the top 1% of the population has seen a continuous decline since independence.
3. Recent data from international organizations suggest a reduction in the income Gini coefficient for India.
How many of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the real growth rate of average income was significantly higher in the post-liberalization period. Statement 2 is incorrect; wealth concentration at the top has skyrocketed, not declined, particularly since the 2000s. Statement 3 is correct, as reports like the UNDP's have indicated a reduction in India's income Gini coefficient in their recent assessments.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current AffairsHard
Q28.With reference to the state's role in the digital economy, consider the following statements:
1. The concept of 'techno-nationalism' involves the state shifting from a passive regulatory role to an active co-investor to build sovereign technological capacity.
2. Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) is primarily designed to create state-owned monopolies, excluding private firms from leveraging foundational digital resources.
3. The convergence of state surveillance and corporate data analytics marks a blurring of boundaries between public security and private commercial interests.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; techno-nationalism describes the state's strategic investment in domestic tech capabilities. Statement 2 is incorrect; DPI aims to democratize access to foundational digital resources to catalyze private innovation and wealth creation, not to exclude private firms. Statement 3 is correct; the use of private AI tools for state functions like policing creates a symbiosis between state and corporate interests.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
25 answers locked
You've used your 3 free answers in Indian Economy. Verify your phone to unlock 20 more — free.
Unlock All Questions
All questions with explanations, AI notes and a personalised revision calendar — in the free app.