Question 1

Consider the following statements regarding Bal Gangadhar Tilak's political stance after his release in June 1914:
1. He advocated for the complete overthrow of the government rather than mere administrative reforms.
2. He urged Indians to provide assistance to the British government during its wartime crisis.
3. He held the view that past acts of violence had only served to retard the pace of political progress in India.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. After his release, Tilak made conciliatory gestures and clarified that he sought a reform of the administration, similar to the Irish Home Rulers, and not an overthrow of the government. Statement 2 is correct. He urged all Indians to assist the British government in its hour of crisis. Statement 3 is also correct. He explicitly admitted that acts of violence had only served to slow down, or retard, the pace of political progress in India.

Question 2

Given below are two statements:
Statement-I: Bal Gangadhar Tilak and Annie Besant decided to revive political activity and launch their respective Home Rule Leagues on their own, without waiting for the formal sanction of the Indian National Congress.
Statement-II: This decision to act independently was a direct consequence of their failure to get the Congress to approve the Home Rule scheme at its annual session in 1915.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect.. Statement-I is correct. Both Tilak and Besant decided to proceed with their own political activities to build momentum for the Home Rule demand. Statement-II is incorrect. The specific trigger for their independent action was the failure to achieve a Moderate-Extremist rapprochement at the 1914 session of the Congress. While Annie Besant also failed to get the Congress to approve her scheme in 1915, the decision to act on their own had already been influenced by the events of the 1914 session.

Question 3

Consider the following factors that contributed to the formation of the Home Rule League Movement:
1. The disillusionment of Moderates with the Morley-Minto reforms.
2. The wartime exposure of the myth of white superiority.
3. The belief among revolutionaries that it was a more effective method than armed struggle.
4. The readiness of the people to protest due to economic hardships like high taxation and price rise.
How many of the above factors are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three. Statement 1 is correct; the text explicitly mentions that Moderates were disillusioned with the Morley-Minto reforms. Statement 2 is correct; the war propaganda exposed the myth of white superiority. Statement 4 is correct; wartime miseries like high taxation and price rises made people ready for an aggressive protest movement. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Home Rule Movement was presented as a less charged but more effective response than the revolutionary activities abroad, not as a method adopted by the revolutionaries themselves, who sought immediate complete independence through armed means.

Question 4

Consider the following statements regarding the Home Rule Leagues:
1. Tilak's Home Rule League was established in April 1916 with its operational headquarters in Bombay city.
2. Annie Besant's All-India Home Rule League had significantly more branches and a more loosely organised structure compared to Tilak's league.
3. The formation of linguistic states and the promotion of education in the vernacular were among the key demands articulated by Tilak's league.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. While Tilak's league was established in April 1916, its headquarters were in Poona, not Bombay. The league's activities were restricted to Maharashtra, but this explicitly excluded Bombay city. Statement 2 is correct. Annie Besant's league had 200 branches and was described as loosely organised, whereas Tilak's league had only six branches, implying a more compact structure. Statement 3 is correct. The demands of Tilak's league included swarajya, the formation of linguistic states, and education in the vernacular.

Question 5

Statement-I: The Home Rule agitation did not attract significant participation from most Muslims and non-brahmins from the South.
Statement-II: These groups felt that the achievement of Home Rule would lead to the establishment of a political system dominated by the high-caste Hindu majority.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. The movement saw limited participation from Anglo-Indians, most Muslims, and non-brahmins from the South. Statement-II is also correct and provides the direct reason for the lack of participation from these groups. They harbored the apprehension that Home Rule would effectively translate into the rule of the Hindu majority, and specifically, the high castes, which would be detrimental to their interests.

Question 6

Consider the following pairs:
1. George Arundale : Organising Secretary, Tilak's League
2. Muhammad Ali Jinnah : Leader, Bombay Division
3. C.P. Ramaswamy Aiyar : Key worker, Besant's League

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is incorrectly matched. George Arundale was the organising secretary for Annie Besant's All-India Home Rule League, not Tilak's League. Pair 2 is correctly matched. Muhammad Ali Jinnah led the Bombay division of the Home Rule agitation. Pair 3 is correctly matched. C.P. Ramaswamy Aiyar, along with B.W. Wadia, was a key figure who carried out the main work for Annie Besant's league.

Question 7

Consider the following statements regarding the decline of the Home Rule Movement:
1. The Moderates, who had joined the movement after Annie Besant's arrest, were pacified by the announcement of the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms in July 1918.
2. Bal Gangadhar Tilak's departure to England in September 1918 was necessitated by a government-instituted case against him for his agitational politics.
3. In 1920, Mahatma Gandhi assumed the presidentship of the All India Home Rule League and immediately merged the organization into the Indian National Congress.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

None. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Moderates were pacified by Montagu’s statement of August 1917, which held self-government as a long-term goal. The Montagu-Chelmsford reforms of July 1918 further divided the nationalist ranks, rather than pacifying them. Statement 2 is incorrect. Tilak went abroad in connection with a private libel case he had filed against Valentine Chirol, the author of the book *Indian Unrest*, not due to a government-instituted case. Statement 3 is incorrect. While Gandhi did become president in 1920, he first changed the organization's name to 'Swarajya Sabha'. The league joined the Indian National Congress within a year of this event, not immediately upon his assumption of the presidency.

Question 8

Consider the following pairs regarding personalities associated with the Home Rule Movement:
1. Sir S. Subramania Aiyar : Advocated a programme of passive resistance after Annie Besant's arrest.
2. Valentine Chirol : Secretary of State for India whose reforms divided the nationalist ranks.
3. George Arundale : An associate of Annie Besant who was arrested in June 1917.
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only one pair. Pair 1 is incorrectly matched. Tilak advocated a programme of passive resistance following Besant's arrest. Sir S. Subramania Aiyar renounced his knighthood in protest. Pair 2 is incorrectly matched. Montagu was the Secretary of State for India whose reforms (Montagu-Chelmsford) divided the nationalist ranks. Valentine Chirol was the author of *Indian Unrest*, against whom Tilak filed a libel case. Pair 3 is correctly matched. George Arundale was an associate of Annie Besant and was arrested alongside her and B.P. Wadia in June 1917.

Question 9

Given below are two statements:
Statement-I: The arrest of Annie Besant and her associates in June 1917 triggered nationwide protests, including the renunciation of a knighthood by Sir S. Subramania Aiyar.
Statement-II: Government repression during the Home Rule agitation consistently hardened the resolve of the agitators, strengthening their will to resist.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct; the arrest of Annie Besant in June 1917 did lead to widespread protests, and Sir S. Subramania Aiyar renounced his knighthood as a direct response. Statement-II is also correct; the government's repressive policies failed to quell the movement and instead intensified the nationalists' determination, as exemplified by Montagu's comment about the government creating 'fifty-two wives' by interning Mrs. Besant. Statement-II provides the correct causal context for Statement-I, as Aiyar's act of protest was a manifestation of the hardened attitude and strengthened resolve of the nationalists in the face of government repression.

Question 10

With reference to the Lucknow Pact of 1916, consider the following joint demands presented by the Congress and the Muslim League to the government:
1. The salaries of the Secretary of State for India should be paid from Indian funds.
2. Half the members of the viceroy’s and provincial governors’ executive councils should be Indians.
3. The term of the legislative council should be five years.
4. The representative assemblies at the central and provincial levels should have an elected minority.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The demand was that the salary of the Secretary of State for India should be paid by the British treasury, not from Indian funds. Statement 2 is correct. A key demand was that half the members of the executive councils of the viceroy and provincial governors should be Indians. Statement 3 is correct. The pact proposed a five-year term for the legislative councils. Statement 4 is incorrect. The demand was for the expansion of representative assemblies with an elected majority, not an elected minority.

Question 11

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: In the years leading up to 1916, the Muslim League's political stance shifted, bringing it closer to the objectives of the Indian National Congress and making it increasingly anti-imperialist.
Statement-II: This shift was significantly influenced by Britain's refusal to help Turkey in its wars and the annulment of the partition of Bengal in 1911.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. The Muslim League, previously aligned with British interests, became more nationalistic and anti-imperialist, aligning with Congress objectives around the time of the Lucknow Pact. Statement-II is also correct and provides the primary reasons for this change. Britain's refusal to support the Ottoman Khalifa (ruler of Turkey) in the Balkan Wars angered Indian Muslims. Similarly, the 1911 annulment of the Bengal partition, which had been supported by a section of Muslims, caused annoyance and disillusionment with the British government. These events directly contributed to the League's changing attitude described in Statement-I.

Question 12

Consider the following pairs:
1. A.C. Majumdar : President of the Lucknow session of the INC (1916)
2. Mohammad Ali : Editor of the publication 'Al-Hilal'
3. Pherozeshah Mehta : Leader who facilitated the reunion by supporting the Extremists' re-entry

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only one pair. Pair 1 is correctly matched. Ambika Charan Majumdar, a Moderate, presided over the Lucknow session of the Indian National Congress in 1916. Pair 2 is incorrectly matched. The publication 'Al-Hilal' was started by Maulana Azad. Mohammad Ali's publication was 'Comrade'. Pair 3 is incorrectly matched. Pherozeshah Mehta was a prominent Moderate leader who had led the opposition to the Extremists. His death, in fact, removed a major obstacle and facilitated the reunion, rather than him actively supporting it.

Question 13

Consider the following statements regarding the Montagu Declaration of August 1917:
1. It proposed a specific timeframe for the 'progressive realisation of responsible government'.
2. It defined 'responsible government' as a system where rulers were answerable to the elected representatives.
3. A principal Indian objection was that the British government retained the sole authority to decide the timing and nature of reforms.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. A key objection from Indian leaders was precisely that no specific time frame was given for the implementation of the policy. Statement 2 is correct. The use of the term 'responsible government' was significant because it implied that the executive would be accountable to the elected legislatures, not just to the imperial government in London. Statement 3 is correct. Indian leaders were resentful that the British would unilaterally decide what was good for India and control the pace of constitutional advance.

Question 14

Consider the following statements:

Statement-I: After August 1917, the nationalist demand for self-government could no longer be legally categorized as seditious by the British Indian government.

Statement-II: The Montagu Declaration made the gradual development of self-governing institutions with a view to the progressive realisation of responsible government an official policy of the British government.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-II is the direct cause of the situation described in Statement-I. Because the British government itself declared the 'progressive realisation of responsible government' as its policy, advocating for that goal (self-government or home rule) ceased to be an act of sedition. The government's policy shift legitimized the core demand of the nationalists, even if the means and timeline were still points of contention.

Question 15

Consider the following statements regarding the Home Rule League Movement:
1. Annie Besant's league was established in April 1916, preceding the formation of Tilak's league.
2. Tilak's league had a more restricted geographical area of operation compared to Besant's league.
3. A significant outcome of the movement was its influence on the readmission of Extremists to the Congress at the Lucknow Session of 1916.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. Tilak’s League was started in April 1916, while Besant’s League was started later in September 1916. Statement 2 is correct. Tilak's league operated specifically in Maharashtra (excluding Bombay city), Karnataka, the Central Provinces, and Berar. Besant's league was responsible for the rest of India, giving it a much larger geographical scope. Statement 3 is correct. The movement created popular pressure and prepared a new generation of nationalists, which was a positive gain that influenced the Moderate-Extremist reunion at the Lucknow session in 1916.

First World War and Nationalist Response

Unlock All Questions