Question 1

Consider the following statements regarding the period of East India Company rule between 1765 and 1773:
1. The dual system of government was characterized by the Company possessing authority but its Indian representatives bearing all the responsibility.
2. Under the arrangement following the Battle of Buxar, Raja Shitab Rai was appointed as the deputy diwan for Bengal.
3. The first intervention by the British government into the Company's Indian affairs was the Regulating Act of 1773.

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is correct. The dual system of government (1765–72) was defined by the Company having authority without responsibility, while its Indian representatives had responsibility without authority. Statement 2 is incorrect. Mohammad Reza Khan was appointed for Bengal, and Raja Shitab Rai was appointed for Bihar. Statement 3 is incorrect. The first intervention by the British government occurred in 1767, when it demanded a 10 per cent share of the Company's plunder.

Question 2

With reference to the Regulating Act of 1773, consider the following provisions:
1. It established a Supreme Court in Bengal whose jurisdiction was clearly defined and universally applicable to all subjects.
2. It mandated that the administration in Bengal be carried out by a governor-general and a council, functioning according to the principle of majority rule.
3. It explicitly granted the governor-general definitive and overriding powers over the presidencies of Bombay and Madras.

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Supreme Court's jurisdiction was debatable and created various problems vis-a-vis the council. Its jurisdiction was only defined within Calcutta by the amending act of 1781. Statement 2 is correct. The administration in Bengal was to be conducted by a governor-general and a council of four members, and they were required to function based on a majority rule. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Act provided that the governor-general could exercise 'some powers' over Bombay and Madras, but this was a vague provision that created many problems, not a definitive or overriding authority.

Question 3

Consider the following statements regarding constitutional developments in British India:
1. The Act for Better Government of India, 1858, established a Council of 15 that held final decision-making authority, with the Secretary of State's role being primarily advisory.
2. The Indian Councils Act of 1861 laid the foundations of legislative devolution by vesting legislative powers in the Governments of Bombay and Madras.
3. The Indian Councils Act of 1909, for the first time, provided for the appointment of an Indian member to the Executive Council of the Governor General.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Act of 1858 stipulated that the council of 15 was to be 'just advisory in nature', and the 'initiative and the final decision was to be with the secretary of state'. The statement reverses these roles. Statement 2 is correct. The 1861 Act vested legislative powers in the Bombay and Madras governments and provided for creating similar councils in other provinces, thereby laying the foundation for legislative devolution. Statement 3 is correct. The Indian Councils Act of 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms) led to Satyendra Prasad Sinha becoming the first Indian to join the Governor General’s Executive Council.

Question 4

Consider the following two statements:
Statement-I: The Indian Councils Act of 1892 increased the number of non-official members in both the central and provincial legislative councils.
Statement-II: The Act of 1892 was enacted primarily in response to the demands for council reform articulated by the Indian National Congress after its founding in 1885.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct; the Indian Councils Act of 1892 did increase the number of non-official members in the legislative councils. Statement-II is also correct; the Indian National Congress, founded in 1885, considered council reform the 'root of all other reforms'. The Act of 1892 was a direct legislative response to this pressure. Therefore, Statement-II provides the direct historical cause for the development mentioned in Statement-I.

Question 5

With reference to the Indian Councils Acts, consider the following statements:
1. The Act of 1861 accepted the principle of representation of non-officials in legislative bodies, but these councils could not discuss executive action or financial matters without prior government approval.
2. The Act of 1892 introduced an element of indirect election by empowering bodies like universities and zamindars to recommend members to provincial councils.
3. The Act of 1909 entitled the members of legislatures, for the first time, to put questions to the executive on matters of public interest after giving six days’ notice.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct. The 1861 Act did introduce non-officials but severely limited the councils' powers; they could not discuss executive action and required previous approval for financial discussions. Statement 2 is correct. The 1892 Act empowered various bodies like universities, district boards, and zamindars to recommend members, which constituted a form of indirect election. Statement 3 is incorrect. The provision allowing members to put questions to the executive after giving six days' notice was introduced by the Indian Councils Act of 1892, not the Act of 1909.

Question 6

Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the Civil Services in British India:
1. The Aitchison Committee (1886) recommended holding simultaneous civil service examinations in India and England.
2. The Charter Act of 1853 introduced the Statutory Civil Service, reserving one-sixth of covenanted posts for nominated Indians.
3. The Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919) recommended that one-third of recruitments to the higher services be made in India itself.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The demand for simultaneous examinations was a key demand of the Indian National Congress. The Aitchison Committee did not recommend this; its main recommendations were to drop the terms 'covenanted' and 'uncovenanted', classify services into Imperial, Provincial, and Subordinate, and raise the age limit to 23. Statement 2 is incorrect. The Statutory Civil Service was introduced by Lord Lytton in 1878–79, not by the Charter Act of 1853. The 1853 Act's primary contribution was ending the Company's patronage and introducing the system of open competition. Statement 3 is correct. The Montford Reforms explicitly recommended that one-third of recruitments be made in India, with a plan for annual increases.

Question 7

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: Lord Cornwallis was instrumental in a policy that reserved all high-value posts for the covenanted servants of the Company, effectively barring Indians.
Statement-II: Cornwallis held the conviction that Indians were inherently corrupt and untrustworthy, making them unsuitable for positions of responsibility within the administration.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. Statement-I is correct. During Cornwallis's tenure as Governor-General, the Charter Act of 1793 reserved all posts worth 500 pounds per annum for the Company's covenanted servants, thus excluding Indians from higher administrative roles. Statement-II is also correct. The rationale for this exclusionary policy was rooted in the British belief that Indians were incapable and insensitive to British interests, a view explicitly held by Cornwallis who thought, 'Every native of Hindustan is corrupt.' Therefore, Statement-II provides the direct ideological justification for the policy action described in Statement-I.

Question 8

Consider the following statements:
1. Lord Wellesley established the East India College at Haileybury in England for the training of civil service recruits.
2. The Indian Civil Service Act of 1861 fixed the maximum permissible age for the examination at 19 years.
3. The Aitchison Committee, set up by Lord Dufferin, recommended raising the age limit for recruitment to 23.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. Lord Wellesley established the Fort William College in Calcutta in 1800. It was the Company's Court of Directors that later disapproved of this and established the East India College at Haileybury in England in 1806. Statement 2 is incorrect. The maximum age was gradually reduced over several years, reaching 19 only in 1878 under Lord Lytton. The age limit was higher at the time of the 1861 Act. Statement 3 is correct. The Aitchison Committee on Public Services (1886) explicitly recommended raising the age limit for entry into the civil service to 23 years.

Question 9

Consider the following statements regarding the evolution of the police system under the British in India:
1. Lord Cornwallis abolished the office of the Superintendent of Police (SP) and made the collector/magistrate the head of the police force in his jurisdiction.
2. Lord Mayo appointed a Superintendent of Police for each division, who was assisted by a number of spies known as 'goyendas'.
3. The Indian Police Act of 1861 provided the framework for the creation of an All-India Police service to ensure uniformity across the country.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. It was William Bentinck who abolished the office of the SP and made the collector/magistrate the head of the police force. Lord Cornwallis, in fact, organised a regular police force with a Superintendent of Police (SP) at the head of a district. Statement 2 is correct. In 1808, Lord Mayo appointed an SP for each division, who was aided by spies. Statement 3 is incorrect. The British did not create an All-India Police. The Police Act of 1861 provided guidelines for police set-ups in the provinces, not for an all-India service.

Question 10

With reference to police reforms in British India, consider the following statements:
1. The Police Commission of 1860 recommended the creation of a Criminal Intelligence Department at the Centre.
2. The Frazer Commission (1902-03) suggested that senior police officials should be recruited directly and not be promoted from junior ranks.
3. The Indian Police Act of 1861 established a system where a village watchman, maintained by the village, was brought into a direct relationship with the formal constabulary.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The creation of a Criminal Intelligence Department at the Centre was a recommendation of the Police Commission of 1902-03 (Frazer Commission), not the Police Commission of 1860. Statement 2 is correct. The Frazer Commission recommended that senior officials should be recruited directly to prevent junior officials from being promoted to high positions. Statement 3 is correct. The Police Commission of 1860, whose recommendations led to the Indian Police Act of 1861, proposed a system of civil constabulary that maintained the village watchman set-up but integrated it into a direct relationship with the rest of the police force.

Question 11

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The police reforms introduced by William Bentinck resulted in a poorly organised police force and placed a significant burden on the collector/magistrate.
Statement-II: Bentinck abolished the office of the Superintendent of Police and consolidated the role of heading the police force within the office of the collector/magistrate for a given jurisdiction.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. The arrangement under Bentinck led to a badly organised police force and overburdened the collector/magistrate. Statement-II is also correct. Bentinck's reform involved abolishing the office of the SP and transferring police authority to the collector/magistrate. Statement-II provides the direct cause for the outcome described in Statement-I, as the abolition of the specialized SP role and the addition of police duties to the already busy collector/magistrate led to inefficiency and disorganization.

Question 12

Consider the following statements regarding the judicial reforms in British India:
1. Under Warren Hastings, the District Faujdari Adalats for criminal disputes were placed directly under the district collector.
2. Lord Cornwallis established circuit courts at Calcutta, Dacca, Murshidabad, and Patna, which were presided over by Indian judges.
3. Lord William Bentinck made English the compulsory official language in all lower courts, replacing Persian.

Accepted Answer

None. All three statements are incorrect. To determine that 'None' is the correct count, each statement must be proven false:

1. **Statement 1 is incorrect.** Under Warren Hastings's judicial plan of 1772, the District Faujdari Adalat was presided over by Indian officers—a Qazi and a Mufti, who were assisted by two Maulvis. The European Collector's role was one of general supervision over the court's functioning, not direct judicial command. The court was not 'directly under' the collector in a judicial capacity, as the collector did not preside over it or pass sentences.

2. **Statement 2 is incorrect.** Lord Cornwallis did establish four provincial courts of appeal which also acted as circuit courts. However, a central tenet of the Cornwallis Code (1793) was the Europeanization of higher administrative and judicial posts due to a distrust of Indian officials. Consequently, these circuit courts were presided over exclusively by senior European covenanted servants of the Company, not by Indian judges.

3. **Statement 3 is incorrect.** Lord William Bentinck's reform did not make English compulsory in all lower courts. On the contrary, his administration permitted the use of vernacular languages in the lower courts, giving suitors the option to use the local language instead of Persian. English replaced Persian as the official language only in the higher echelons of the judiciary, such as the Supreme Court.

Since all three statements are factually incorrect, the correct count is zero.

Question 13

Consider the following two statements:
Statement-I: During the reforms of Lord Cornwallis, the office of the Collector was made responsible only for revenue administration, and its magisterial functions were withdrawn.
Statement-II: The Cornwallis Code was fundamentally based on establishing the principle of separation of powers between revenue and justice administration.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Both statements are correct. Statement-I accurately describes a key reform under Cornwallis where the Collector's judicial powers were removed. Statement-II correctly identifies the underlying principle of the Cornwallis Code, which was the separation of revenue (executive) and justice (judicial) functions. Statement-II provides the direct ideological and administrative reason for the action described in Statement-I; the Collector's magisterial functions were removed precisely to enforce this separation of powers.

Question 14

Consider the following statements about the judicial system in British India:
1. The Regulating Act of 1773 established a Supreme Court at Calcutta with jurisdiction limited exclusively to British European subjects.
2. Under the system established by Lord Cornwallis, the Sadar Diwani Adalat was the highest court of appeal, with no further judicial recourse available.
3. A Law Commission was established under Lord Macaulay for the codification of Indian laws.

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Supreme Court established by the Regulating Act of 1773 was competent to try all British subjects, which explicitly included both Indians and Europeans. Statement 2 is incorrect. While the Sadar Diwani Adalat was a high appellate court, appeals from it could be made to the King-in-Council in England for cases involving 5,000 pounds or more. Statement 3 is correct. During the tenure of Lord William Bentinck, a Law Commission was set up in 1833 under Macaulay to codify Indian laws. Therefore, only one statement is correct.

Question 15

Consider the following statements regarding the administrative changes instituted after 1857:

1. The Act for Better Government of India, 1858, established a Council of 15 to assist the Viceroy, which was purely advisory in nature.
2. The Indian Councils Act, 1861, added a fifth member, who was to be a jurist, to the Secretary of State's Council.
3. The dual system of control introduced by Pitt’s India Act, 1784, was formally ended by the Act of 1858.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Council of 15 was created to assist the Secretary of State for India in London, not the Viceroy in India. Statement 2 is incorrect. The fifth member, a jurist, was added to the Viceroy's Executive Council, not the Secretary of State's Council. Statement 3 is correct. The Act of 1858 transferred power from the East India Company to the British Crown, abolishing the roles of the Company's Directors and the Board of Control, thereby ending the dual system established by the Pitt’s India Act, 1784.

Question 16

With reference to the legislative council constituted by the Indian Councils Act, 1861, consider the following statements regarding its powers:

1. The council was barred from discussing financial matters without the prior approval of the government.
2. The council possessed the authority to discuss executive actions, but not to vote on them.
3. A bill passed by the council and approved by the Viceroy was final and could not be overturned.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is correct. The legislative council could not discuss important matters, and specifically no financial matters at all, without the previous approval of the government. Statement 2 is incorrect. The council could not discuss executive action. Statement 3 is incorrect. Even if a bill was approved by the Viceroy, the Secretary of State could disallow the legislation.

Question 17

Consider the following statements regarding Lord Ripon's Resolution of 1882:
1. The resolution advocated for local bodies to be constituted with a majority of non-official members, who could be elected where feasible.
2. A primary objective stated in the resolution was the development of local bodies as an instrument for political and popular education.
3. The resolution sought to eliminate all official executive sanction over the financial decisions of local bodies, such as raising loans or imposing new taxes.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct. The resolution proposed that non-officials were to be in the majority in these bodies and that elections could be introduced if officials deemed it possible. Statement 2 is correct. The resolution explicitly mentioned that the development of local bodies was advocated not only for administrative improvement but also as an instrument of political and popular education. Statement 3 is incorrect. The resolution did not eliminate official oversight; rather, it specified that official executive sanction was required for certain actions, including raising loans, imposing new taxes, and the alienation of municipal property.

Question 18

Statement-I: Lord Ripon is often called the father of local self-government in India due to his resolution of 1882 which significantly advanced the framework for local bodies.
Statement-II: Ripon's Resolution was the first major initiative that inaugurated the process of financial decentralisation by transferring departments like education and medical services to provincial governments and authorising local taxation.

Accepted Answer

Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I is correct. Lord Ripon's Resolution of 1882 was a landmark in the development of local self-government, advocating for elected majorities and non-official chairpersons, earning him the title 'father of local self-government'. Statement-II is incorrect. The process of financial decentralisation by transferring departments like education and medical services to provincial control was primarily a feature of Lord Mayo’s Resolution of 1870. Ripon's Resolution extended the principle of decentralisation from the provinces to the local bodies, but it did not inaugurate the initial process.

Constitutional Administrative and Judicial Developments

Unlock All Questions