Question 1

Consider the following statements regarding various commissions appointed in the mid-1920s:
1. The Muddiman Committee recommended the immediate establishment of the statutory public service commission as proposed by the Government of India Act 1919.
2. The Linlithgow Commission's report included a strong criticism of the system of dyarchy, demanding its immediate abolition.
3. The Lee Commission was established to examine the condition of India’s agricultural and rural economy.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

None. To determine the number of correct statements, let's analyze each one:

1. **Statement 1 is incorrect.** The recommendation for the immediate establishment of the statutory Public Service Commission came from the **Lee Commission (1924)**, not the Muddiman Committee. The Muddiman Committee (1924) was appointed as the Reforms Enquiry Committee to examine the working of the dyarchy system.

2. **Statement 2 is incorrect.** The strong criticism of dyarchy and the demand for its abolition came from the minority report of the **Muddiman Committee**, which included non-official Indian members. The Linlithgow Commission (Royal Commission on Agriculture, 1926) was tasked with examining India's agricultural and rural economy, not constitutional reforms like dyarchy.

3. **Statement 3 is incorrect.** The commission established to examine India's agricultural and rural economy was the **Linlithgow Commission**. The Lee Commission (Royal Commission on the Superior Civil Services in India, 1924) was appointed to examine the organization, recruitment, and conditions of service for the civil services.

Since all three statements are factually incorrect, the correct count is zero. Therefore, 'None' is the correct answer.

Question 2

Consider the following two statements:
Statement-I: The Indian Statutory Commission was appointed by the British government in 1927, two years ahead of its scheduled review in 1929.
Statement-II: The appointment was expedited because the ruling Conservative government feared that a potential future Labour government would handle the matter irresponsibly.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. The Government of India Act, 1919, had a provision for a commission to be appointed after 10 years (i.e., in 1929). However, the Simon Commission was set up on November 8, 1927. Statement-II is also correct. The Conservative government under Stanley Baldwin appointed the commission early precisely because they feared an electoral defeat by the Labour Party and did not want to leave the future of Britain’s most prized colony in what they termed 'irresponsible Labour hands'. Thus, Statement-II is the correct explanation for the early appointment mentioned in Statement-I.

Question 3

With reference to the arguments presented by Dr. Ambedkar to the Simon Commission, consider the following statements:
1. He advocated for the implementation of dyarchy in the provinces and complete provincial autonomy at the Centre.
2. He argued that the depressed classes should be regarded as a distinct and independent minority, separate from the Hindu community.
3. He unconditionally demanded a separate electorate for the depressed classes, regardless of whether universal adult franchise was granted.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. Dr. Ambedkar advocated for the reverse: provincial autonomy in the provinces and dyarchy at the Centre. Statement 2 is correct. On behalf of the Bahishkrita Hitakarini Sabha, he submitted a memorandum arguing that the depressed classes should be regarded as a distinct and independent minority. Statement 3 is incorrect. The demand for a separate electorate was conditional. Dr. Ambedkar stated he would campaign for a separate electorate for the depressed classes only if universal adult franchise was not granted.

Question 4

Consider the following statements regarding the Indian response to the Simon Commission:
1. The faction of the Muslim League led by Muhammad Shafi at Lahore decided to join the Congress in boycotting the commission.
2. The Justice Party in the south decided not to boycott the commission.
3. The liberals of the Hindu Mahasabha decided to support the Congress's call for a boycott.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Muslim League faction under Muhammad Shafi, which met in Lahore, decided to support the government and did not boycott the commission. It was the faction under Jinnah, meeting in Calcutta, that decided on a boycott. Statement 2 is correct. The Justice Party in the south, along with the Unionists in Punjab, decided not to boycott the commission. Statement 3 is correct. The liberals of the Hindu Mahasabha were among the groups that decided to support the Congress call for a boycott.

Question 5

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The widespread protests against the Simon Commission were marked by the emergence of Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Bose as prominent leaders of youth and student movements.
Statement-II: The fundamental reason for the Indian anger towards the commission was its all-white composition, which was perceived as a denial of the principle of self-determination and an insult to Indian self-respect, thereby energizing a new generation of political activists.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Bose emerged as leaders of the new wave of youth and students during the anti-Simon Commission protests. Statement-II is also correct. The exclusion of Indians from the commission was seen as a violation of the principle of self-determination and a deliberate insult, which was the primary cause of the nationwide protests. The intense public upsurge, particularly among the youth who participated with a militant flavour, created the political environment in which these new, more radical leaders gained prominence. Therefore, the national anger described in Statement-II directly led to the youth upsurge that propelled the leaders in Statement-I to the forefront.

Question 6

With reference to the recommendations of the Simon Commission, consider the following statements:
1. It recommended the immediate establishment of an all-India federation.
2. It proposed the abolition of dyarchy and the establishment of representative government in the provinces.
3. It advocated for the introduction of universal franchise.
4. It suggested that separate communal electorates should be retained but not extended to any new communities.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Commission accepted the idea of federalism in principle but explicitly stated it was not for the near future, instead suggesting a 'Consultative Council of Greater India'. Statement 2 is correct. The report recommended abolishing the system of dyarchy and introducing representative, autonomous governments in the provinces. Statement 3 is incorrect. The report explicitly recommended against universal franchise. Statement 4 is incorrect. The report recommended that separate communal electorates should not only be retained but also be extended to other communities until inter-communal tensions subsided.

Question 7

Consider the following statements regarding the proposals of the Simon Commission for the central government and territorial changes:
1. It recommended the introduction of parliamentary responsibility at the centre.
2. It proposed that the Government of India should have complete control over the high court.
3. It suggested the separation of Burma from India and Sindh from Bombay.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Commission explicitly rejected the idea of parliamentary responsibility at the centre. It proposed that the Governor-General would retain complete power to appoint members of his cabinet. Statement 2 is correct. The report recommended that the Government of India would maintain complete control over the high court. Statement 3 is correct. The Commission recommended the separation of Burma from India, viewing it as not a natural part of the subcontinent, and also the separation of Sindh from the Bombay Presidency.

Question 8

Consider the following statements regarding the recommendations of the Nehru Report (1928):
1. It proposed a system of joint electorates with reservation of seats for Muslims in provinces where they were in a majority, such as Punjab and Bengal.
2. It recommended a bicameral legislature at the Centre, where the upper house (Senate) would be directly elected on the basis of adult suffrage.
3. It advocated for the complete dissociation of the State from religion.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The report recommended reservation of seats for Muslims at the Centre and in provinces where they were in a minority, but not in provinces where they were in a majority, like Punjab and Bengal. Statement 2 is incorrect. The report proposed that the lower house (House of Representatives) would be elected on the basis of adult suffrage, while the Senate would be elected by provincial councils, not directly by the people. Statement 3 is correct. A key recommendation was the complete dissociation of the State from religion.

Question 9

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: The Nehru Committee's report was not entirely unanimous in its final recommendations.
Statement-II: The committee was divided on the fundamental issue of the form of government, with a majority favouring 'dominion status' while a section desired 'complete independence'.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I.. Statement-I is correct. The report's recommendations were unanimous except in one specific respect. Statement-II is also correct. This lack of unanimity was due to a fundamental disagreement over the constitutional goal; while the majority of the committee settled for 'dominion status', a section of its members wanted 'complete independence'. Therefore, Statement-II provides the precise reason for the lack of complete unanimity mentioned in Statement-I.

Question 10

With reference to the governmental structure proposed by the Nehru Report, consider the following statements:
1. The Central Government was to be headed by a Governor-General paid out of British revenues.
2. The tenure for the central House of Representatives and the provincial councils was proposed to be identical at five years.
3. The report confined its constitutional framework strictly to British India, excluding any future relationship with the princely states.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Governor-General was to be paid out of Indian revenues, not British revenues. Statement 2 is correct. The report proposed a 5-year tenure for the House of Representatives at the Centre and also a 5-year tenure for the provincial councils. Statement 3 is incorrect. While the report's framework confined itself to British India, it explicitly envisaged a future link-up of British India with the princely states on a federal basis, rather than excluding any future relationship.

Question 11

Consider the following statements regarding the political negotiations surrounding the Nehru Report:

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct. The Delhi Proposals of December 1927 explicitly called for 'Joint electorates in place of separate electorates with reserved seats for Muslims'. Statement 2 is correct. The Hindu Mahasabha was 'vehemently opposed to the proposals for creating new Muslim-majority provinces' and 'demanded a strictly unitary structure'. Statement 3 is incorrect. Jinnah's third amendment to the Nehru Report proposed that 'Residual powers to be given to the provinces', not the central legislature.

Question 12

Consider the following provisions with reference to Jinnah's Fourteen Points of March 1929:

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct. Point 8 of the Fourteen Points explicitly demanded 'Separate electorates'. Statement 2 is correct. Point 1 demanded a 'Federal Constitution with residual powers for provinces'. Statement 3 is incorrect. Point 7 of the Fourteen Points demanded that 'In any cabinet at the centre or in the provinces, one-third of the members to be Muslims', not one-fourth.

Question 13

With reference to the Nehru Report (1928), consider the following statements:
1. It recommended the principle of separate electorates for minorities.
2. It advocated for the establishment of responsible government at both the central and provincial levels.
3. It was the first major Indian-led effort to formulate a constitutional framework for the country.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect. The Nehru Report explicitly recommended against separate electorates, proposing instead a system of joint electorates with reserved seats for minorities. Statement 2 is correct. The report recommended responsible governments at the centre and in the provinces. Statement 3 is correct. The Nehru Report is recognized as the first significant attempt by Indians to draft a constitutional scheme for India.

Question 14

Consider the following statements:
Statement-I: Jawaharlal Nehru and Subhas Chandra Bose jointly established the Independence for India League.
Statement-II: They were angered by the Nehru Report's recommendation of dominion status, which they viewed as a regressive step backward from the goal of complete independence.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I. Statement-I is factually correct. Statement-II is also correct and provides the direct ideological motivation for the action in Statement-I. The younger section of the Congress, led by Nehru and Bose, was dissatisfied with the dominion status goal of the Nehru Report. They considered it a retreat from the demand for complete independence and, as a result of this disagreement, they formed the Independence for India League to champion their cause.

Simon Commission and the Nehru Report

Unlock All Questions