Q1.With reference to the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), consider the following statements:
1. The recommendations made by the Commission are binding on the concerned government or authority.
2. The Commission is required to be informed about the action taken on its recommendations within one month.
3. The Commission can inquire into a matter of human rights violation only if it is reported within six months of its occurrence.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the functions of the NHRC are mainly recommendatory and its recommendations are not binding. Statement 3 is incorrect as the Commission cannot inquire into any matter after the expiry of one year from the date on which the act constituting a violation of human rights is alleged to have been committed. Statement 2 is correct as the Commission must be informed of the action taken on its recommendations within one month.
Textbookhard
Q2.Consider the following statements regarding the appointment and tenure of the members of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC):
1. The chairperson and members are appointed by the President on the recommendations of a committee that includes the Chief Justice of India.
2. The chairperson and members hold office for a term of three years or until they attain the age of 70 years, whichever is earlier.
3. After their tenure, the chairperson and members are not eligible for further employment under the Central or a state government.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The appointment committee consists of the Prime Minister, Speaker of the Lok Sabha, Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, Leaders of the Opposition in both Houses of Parliament, and the Central Home Minister. The Chief Justice of India is only consulted when appointing a sitting judge of the Supreme Court or a sitting chief justice of a high court. Statements 2 and 3 are correct descriptions of the tenure and post-tenure employment restrictions.
Textbookmedium
Q3.Consider the following individuals:
1. Chairperson, National Commission for Scheduled Castes
2. Chairperson, National Commission for Women
3. Chairperson, National Commission for Backward Classes
4. Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities
How many of the above are ex-officio members of the National Human Rights Commission?
Explanation: The National Human Rights Commission includes several ex-officio members. These are the chairpersons of the National Commission for Minorities, the National Commission for SCs, the National Commission for STs, the National Commission for Women, the National Commission for Backward Classes, the National Commission for the Protection of Child Rights, and the Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities. Therefore, all four individuals listed are ex-officio members.
Textbookhard
Q4.Consider the following pairs regarding the composition and appointment of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC):
1. Chairperson : A retired Chief Justice of India or a retired judge of the Supreme Court.
2. Appointment Committee : Headed by the President of India.
3. Member : A serving judge of the Supreme Court appointed without consulting the Chief Justice of India.
4. Ex-officio Member : Chairperson of the National Commission for Minorities.
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: Pair 1 is correct. The Chairperson must be a retired Chief Justice of India or a retired judge of the Supreme Court. Pair 2 is incorrect; the appointment committee is headed by the Prime Minister. Pair 3 is incorrect; a sitting judge of the Supreme Court can be appointed only after consultation with the Chief Justice of India. Pair 4 is correct; the Chairperson of the National Commission for Minorities is an ex-officio member. Thus, only two pairs are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q5.Statement I: The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has limited powers with regard to human rights violations by the armed forces.
Statement II: In cases of human rights violations by the armed forces, the NHRC can independently investigate the matter and direct disciplinary action.
Explanation: Statement I is correct. The NHRC's powers concerning human rights violations by armed forces are limited. Statement II is incorrect because, in such cases, the Commission can only seek a report from the Central Government and make its recommendations based on that report. It does not have the power to conduct an independent investigation or direct disciplinary action against the armed forces.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q6.Consider the following statements regarding the Indian Parliament:
1. It is the primary legislative organ of the Union government.
2. Its central position in the Indian democratic system is a consequence of adopting the parliamentary form of government.
3. The 'Westminster model of government' is another term for the parliamentary system adopted by India.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: All three statements are correct. The Parliament serves as the legislative body for the Union. Its pre-eminent role is attributed to the adoption of the parliamentary system, which is also known as the Westminster model.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q7.Consider the following statements about the constitutional provisions for the Parliament:
1. The articles of the Constitution that deal with the Parliament are contained in Part V.
2. The relevant articles cover a wide range of subjects including the Parliament's organisation, duration, and procedures.
3. Articles 79 to 122 exclusively deal with the powers and privileges of the members of Parliament.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect. The Constitution, in Articles 79 to 122, deals with a broad range of topics concerning the Parliament, not exclusively its powers and privileges. The text mentions 'organisation, composition, duration, officers, procedures, privileges, powers and so on', indicating a wider scope.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q8.With reference to the Indian Parliament, consider the following attributes:
1. Legislative organ of the Union government
2. A central and pre-eminent position in the political system
3. An institution based on the Westminster model
4. An organ of government whose details are in Part VI of the Constitution
How many of the above attributes are correctly stated?
Explanation: The first three attributes are correct. The Parliament is the Union's legislative body, holds a central position, and is based on the Westminster model. The fourth attribute is incorrect as the provisions for the Parliament are in Part V, not Part VI, of the Constitution.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q9.Statement I: The Constitution of India, within Articles 79 to 122, lays down provisions concerning the procedures of the Parliament.
Statement II: The adoption of the Westminster model of government, which is a form of parliamentary government, is the reason for the Parliament's pre-eminent and central position in the Indian democratic system.
Explanation: Both statements are individually correct based on the provided text. Statement I correctly notes that Articles 79-122 cover parliamentary procedures. Statement II correctly links the Westminster model to the Parliament's central position. However, Statement II explains the Parliament's status and form of government, not specifically why its procedures are detailed in the Constitution. The two facts are related but one is not a direct explanation of the other.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q10.Consider the following pairs:
1. Part V of the Constitution : Deals with the Parliament
2. Articles 79 to 122 : Deals with the organisation and composition of the Parliament
3. Westminster model : Parliamentary form of government
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Explanation: All three pairs are correctly matched. Part V of the Constitution contains the provisions for the Parliament. Articles 79 to 122 detail its organisation, composition, and other aspects. The Westminster model is another name for the parliamentary form of government adopted by India.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q11.Consider the following statements regarding the composition of the Parliament of India:
1. The Parliament of India consists of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha only.
2. The President of India is not a member of either House of Parliament but is considered an integral part of it.
3. The Indian model of including the head of the executive as part of the legislature is based on the American pattern.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the Parliament consists of three parts: the President, the Council of States (Rajya Sabha), and the House of the People (Lok Sabha). Statement 3 is incorrect because this model is based on the British pattern (Crown-in-Parliament), not the American one, where the President is not part of the Congress.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q12.With reference to the composition of the Rajya Sabha, consider the following statements:
1. The maximum strength of the Rajya Sabha is fixed at 250.
2. The Fourth Schedule of the Constitution deals with the allocation of seats in the Rajya Sabha to the states and union territories.
3. At present, representatives of union territories in the Rajya Sabha are more in number than the members nominated by the President.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. The maximum strength is 250, and the Fourth Schedule governs seat allocation. Statement 3 is incorrect; at present, there are 4 members representing union territories, while 12 members are nominated by the President.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q13.Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The President of India is an integral part of the Parliament.
Statement II: The parliamentary form of government, as adopted in India, emphasises the interdependence between the legislative and executive organs.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Both statements are correct. The President, as the head of the executive, is an integral part of the Parliament (legislature). This arrangement is a direct consequence of the parliamentary system's principle of interdependence between the executive and legislature, making Statement II the correct explanation for Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q14.Consider the following regarding the election and nomination to the Lok Sabha:
1. Representatives of states are directly elected based on the principle of universal adult franchise.
2. The Constitution itself prescribes the manner of choosing representatives from the union territories.
3. The President can nominate two members from the Anglo-Indian community if the community is not adequately represented.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Statement 3 is also correct based on the provided text's context (which refers to the provision existing until 2020). Statement 2 is incorrect; the Constitution empowers the Parliament, not the Constitution itself, to prescribe the manner of choosing representatives from UTs. Parliament did so via the Union Territories (Direct Election to the House of the People) Act, 1965.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q15.Consider the following facts:
1. The Hindi names 'Rajya Sabha' and 'Lok Sabha' were adopted in 1954.
2. The voting age for Lok Sabha elections was reduced from 21 to 18 years by the 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1988.
3. The maximum strength of the Lok Sabha is fixed at 552.
4. The provision for Anglo-Indian nomination to the Lok Sabha was extended till 2020 by the 95th Amendment Act, 2009.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: All four statements are factually correct as per the provided text. The Hindi names were adopted in 1954. The 61st Amendment reduced the voting age. The maximum strength of the Lok Sabha is 552. The 95th Amendment extended the Anglo-Indian nomination provision until 2020.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q16.Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions for representation in the Lok Sabha:
1. Each state is allotted seats in the Lok Sabha such that the ratio between the number of seats and its population is the same for all states.
2. The provision for maintaining a uniform ratio of seats to population between states does not apply to states with a population below six million.
3. Within a state, each territorial constituency is divided in a manner that the ratio between its population and the number of seats allotted to it is the same throughout the state.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: The Constitution ensures uniformity of representation in two respects: (a) between different states, by maintaining a consistent ratio of seats to population, with an exception for states having a population less than six million; and (b) between different constituencies within the same state, by ensuring the ratio of population to seats is uniform throughout the state. All three statements accurately reflect these provisions.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q17.With reference to the delimitation of constituencies for the Lok Sabha, consider the following pairs:
1. 42nd Amendment Act : Froze the allocation of seats in the Lok Sabha at the 1971 level.
2. 84th Amendment Act : Empowered the government to undertake readjustment of constituencies based on the 1991 census.
3. 87th Amendment Act : Provided for the delimitation of constituencies on the basis of the 2001 census.
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: All three pairs are correctly matched. The 42nd Amendment (1976) froze seat allocation based on the 1971 census. The 84th Amendment (2001) allowed for constituency rationalisation based on the 1991 census. The 87th Amendment (2003) subsequently updated this basis to the 2001 census for delimitation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q18.The Constitution of India did not adopt the system of proportional representation for elections to the Lok Sabha. Consider the following as potential reasons for this decision:
1. The complexity of the system for voters, given the low literacy levels at the time.
2. The unsuitability of the system for a parliamentary government due to its tendency to create instability.
3. The high expenditure associated with implementing the system.
4. The elimination of intimate contact between voters and their representatives.
How many of the above were cited as reasons or demerits for not adopting the system?
Explanation: The text mentions two primary reasons for not adopting proportional representation for the Lok Sabha: its complexity for voters and its tendency to multiply political parties, leading to governmental instability. Additionally, it lists several demerits of the system, including that it is highly expensive and that it eliminates intimate contacts between voters and representatives. Therefore, all four points are valid reasons or demerits considered.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q19.Consider the following statements regarding the reservation of seats in the Lok Sabha:
1. The Constitution provides for the reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes on the basis of their population ratios.
2. The election to a reserved seat is conducted through a system of separate electorates where only members of the respective community can vote.
3. A member belonging to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe is not debarred from contesting a general (non-reserved) seat.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect. Although seats are reserved for SCs and STs, they are elected by all the voters in that constituency, not by a separate electorate. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Constitution mandates reservation based on population ratios, and members of SC/ST communities are free to contest from general seats as well.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q20.Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Constitution of India has adopted the system of territorial representation, also known as the First-Past-the-Post system, for elections to the Lok Sabha.
Statement II: The system of proportional representation was considered unsuitable for India's parliamentary government as it tends to multiply political parties, leading to instability.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Both statements are factually correct. Statement I states the electoral system adopted for the Lok Sabha. Statement II provides one of the key reasons why the Constituent Assembly chose the system in Statement I over the alternative of proportional representation. Therefore, Statement II is a correct explanation for the choice mentioned in Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q21.Consider the following statements regarding the duration of the Houses of Parliament:
1. The Constitution of India fixes the term of office for a member of the Rajya Sabha at six years.
2. The term of the Lok Sabha can be extended during a national emergency by a law of Parliament for one year at a time.
3. The President's decision to dissolve the Lok Sabha before the completion of its term cannot be challenged in a court of law.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the Constitution left the term of Rajya Sabha members to Parliament, which then specified a six-year term in the Representation of the People Act (1951). Statements 2 and 3 are correct as the Lok Sabha's term can be extended during an emergency, and the President's power to dissolve it is explicitly mentioned as non-justiciable in the source text.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q22.Under the Representation of the People Act (1951), a person shall be disqualified for being elected as a Member of Parliament for
which of the following reasons?
1. Being found guilty of corrupt practices in elections.
2. Holding an office of profit in a corporation where the government has at least a 25 per cent share.
3. Detention under a preventive detention law.
4. Being punished for preaching and practising social crimes such as dowry and sati.
How many of the above are correct grounds for disqualification?
Explanation: The Representation of the People Act (1951) specifies several grounds for disqualification. These include being found guilty of election offences, holding an office of profit in a government-linked corporation (with at least 25% share), and being punished for social crimes. However, the Act explicitly states that detention under a preventive detention law is not a disqualification. Therefore, three of the listed grounds are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q23.Statement I: If a person is elected to both Houses of Parliament, they must intimate within 10 days in which House they desire to serve, failing which their seat in the Rajya Sabha becomes vacant.
Statement II: If a person is elected as a member of both the Parliament and a state legislature, their seat in Parliament becomes vacant if they do not resign their seat in the state legislature within 14 days.
Explanation: Both statements accurately describe the procedures laid out in the Representation of People Act (1951) for situations of dual membership. For dual membership in Parliament, a 10-day intimation period is given, with the Rajya Sabha seat becoming vacant by default. For dual membership in Parliament and a state legislature, a 14-day period is given to resign the state seat, failing which the Parliament seat becomes vacant.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q24.Consider the following pairs regarding the disqualification of a Member of Parliament:
1. Ground: Holding an office of profit under the Union government - Deciding Authority: President of India
2. Ground: Disqualification on the ground of defection - Deciding Authority: Chairman of Rajya Sabha or Speaker of Lok Sabha
3. Ground: Election of a disqualified person is found to be void - Deciding Authority: Supreme Court
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: Pair 1 is correct: The President decides on disqualifications (other than defection), based on the Election Commission's opinion. Pair 2 is correct: The Presiding Officer (Speaker/Chairman) decides on disqualification under the Tenth Schedule (defection). Pair 3 is incorrect: The Representation of the People Act (1951) enables the High Court to declare an election void if a disqualified candidate is elected. An appeal can then be made to the Supreme Court, but the initial authority is the High Court.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q25.With reference to the qualifications for membership of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. A person must be not less than 30 years of age to be chosen as a member of the Lok Sabha.
2. A candidate contesting an election to the Rajya Sabha must be registered as an elector in the particular state from which they are contesting.
3. Before taking their seat, every member must make and subscribe to an oath before a person authorised by the Election Commission for this purpose.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the minimum age for Lok Sabha is 25 years, while 30 is for Rajya Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect; the requirement for a Rajya Sabha candidate to be an elector in the same state was removed in 2003. Statement 3 is incorrect; the oath for a member of Parliament is taken before the President or a person appointed by the President for that purpose, not someone authorised by the Election Commission.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q26.Consider the following regarding the individual privileges of Members of Parliament:
1. They cannot be arrested during the session of Parliament in criminal cases.
2. They are exempted from jury service.
3. They have absolute freedom of speech in Parliament without any restrictions.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the privilege from arrest is available only in civil cases, not in criminal cases or preventive detention cases. Statement 3 is incorrect because the freedom of speech in Parliament is subject to the provisions of the Constitution and to the rules and standing orders regulating the procedure of Parliament. Statement 2 is correct as members are exempted from jury service.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q27.With reference to the remuneration of Members and Officers of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution of India explicitly provides for a pension for the members of Parliament.
2. The salaries of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
3. The salaries of Members of Parliament are determined by Parliament through legislation.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the Constitution does not provide for a pension, but Parliament has enacted a law to provide pensions to members. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. The salaries of the Presiding Officers are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India, making them non-votable. Parliament determines the salaries and allowances for its members and officers through acts like the Salaries, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q28.Parliamentary privileges in India are based on several sources. Consider the following potential sources:
1. Constitutional provisions
2. Various laws made by Parliament
3. Rules of both the Houses
4. Parliamentary conventions
5. Judicial interpretations
How many of the above are considered sources for parliamentary privileges in India?
Explanation: The Parliament has not made a special law to exhaustively codify all privileges. They are based on all five sources mentioned: Constitutional provisions (like Article 105), various laws made by Parliament, rules of both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, parliamentary conventions, and judicial interpretations.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q29.Consider the following statements:
Statement I: A person who is a Union Minister but not a member of either House of Parliament can participate in the proceedings of both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
Statement II: The Constitution extends parliamentary privileges to Union ministers and the Attorney General of India, entitling them to speak in the proceedings of a House of Parliament.
Explanation: Both statements are factually correct. A minister can participate in the proceedings of both Houses, even if they are not a member of either for up to six months. The Attorney General and ministers are also extended parliamentary privileges. However, Statement II, while related, does not serve as the direct explanation for Statement I. The right of a minister to speak in a house of which they are not a member is a specific constitutional provision to facilitate the functioning of the executive within the legislature, not merely a consequence of having privileges.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q30.With reference to 'breach of privilege' and 'contempt of the House', consider the following actions:
1. Disregarding the immunities of a member of the House.
2. Disobeying a legitimate order of the House.
3. An act that obstructs a member in the performance of their functions.
How many of the above actions can be treated as 'contempt of the House'?
Explanation: Contempt of the House has wider implications than breach of privilege. While actions 1 and 3 are clear examples of breach of privilege, they also constitute contempt. Action 2, disobeying a legitimate order, is explicitly mentioned as an example that can be punished as contempt of the House, even if it is not a specific breach of privilege. Therefore, all three actions can be treated as contempt of the House.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q31.Consider the following statements regarding the Speaker of the Lok Sabha:
1. The Speaker's decision on whether a bill is a Money Bill is final and cannot be challenged in any court.
2. When a resolution for the removal of the Speaker is under consideration, the Speaker can vote in the first instance.
3. The Speaker does not vacate the office upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha and continues until the first meeting of the newly-elected Lok Sabha.
4. The Speaker acts as the ex-officio chairman of the conference of presiding officers of legislative bodies in the country.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: All four statements are correct. The Speaker's decision on a Money Bill is final. During a removal resolution, the Speaker can be present, speak, and vote in the first instance but cannot preside. The Speaker continues in office after dissolution until the new Lok Sabha meets to ensure continuity. The Speaker is also the ex-officio chairman of the conference of presiding officers of legislative bodies in India.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q32.With reference to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha,
which of the following bills will NOT lapse?
1. A bill passed by the Lok Sabha but pending in the Rajya Sabha.
2. A bill pending in the Rajya Sabha but not passed by the Lok Sabha.
3. A bill passed by both Houses but pending assent of the President.
4. A bill for which the President has notified the holding of a joint sitting before the dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
Explanation: Upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, a bill passed by it but pending in the Rajya Sabha lapses. However, a bill originating and pending in the Rajya Sabha (and not yet passed by the Lok Sabha) does not lapse. Bills that have been passed by both Houses and are awaiting presidential assent, or bills for which a joint sitting has already been notified by the President, also do not lapse.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q33.Consider the following statements regarding the historical evolution of the presiding officers in India:
1. The institutions of Speaker and Deputy Speaker originated in India under the Government of India Act of 1919.
2. The Government of India Act of 1935 changed the nomenclatures of President and Deputy President of the Central Legislative Assembly to Speaker and Deputy Speaker respectively, which came into effect immediately.
3. G.V. Mavalankar was the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; the offices originated in 1921 under the GoI Act, 1919. Statement 2 is incorrect because while the 1935 Act changed the nomenclature, the old names 'President' and 'Deputy President' continued till 1947 as the federal part of the act was not implemented. Statement 3 is correct; G.V. Mavalankar was the first Speaker of the Lok Sabha. The question asks for the incorrect statement.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q34.Consider the following pairs:
1. Leader of the House : Office mentioned in the Constitution of India
2. Leader of the Opposition : Office mentioned in a Parliamentary Statute
3. Whip : Office based on conventions of parliamentary government
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: Pair 1 is incorrectly matched; the office of the Leader of the House is mentioned in the Rules of the House, not the Constitution. Pair 2 is correctly matched; the Leader of the Opposition was accorded statutory recognition in 1977. Pair 3 is correctly matched; the office of the Whip is not mentioned in the Constitution, Rules of the House, or any statute, but is based on parliamentary conventions.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q35.Consider the following statements comparing the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha:
1. While the Speaker can be removed by a resolution passed by a majority of all the then members of the Lok Sabha, the Chairman can be removed only if he is removed from the office of the Vice-President.
2. The Speaker presides over a joint sitting of the two Houses of Parliament, a power not available to the Chairman.
3. When a resolution for their removal is under consideration, both the Speaker and the Chairman cannot vote in the first instance.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct descriptions of the differences between the Speaker and the Chairman. Statement 3 is incorrect. When a removal resolution is under consideration, the Speaker can vote in the first instance but not in case of a tie. The Chairman, however, cannot vote at all during his removal proceedings, though he can be present and speak.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q36.Consider the following pairs regarding questions asked in the Parliament and the colour of the paper on which they are printed:
1. Starred Question : Green
2. Unstarred Question : Light Pink
3. Short Notice Question : White
4. Question to Private Member : Yellow
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: The lists of different types of questions are printed in specific colours to distinguish them. Starred questions are printed on green paper and questions to private members are on yellow paper. However, unstarred questions are printed on white paper, and short notice questions are on light pink paper. Therefore, only pairs 1 and 4 are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q37.With reference to the Adjournment Motion in the Indian Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. It is regarded as an extraordinary device as it interrupts the normal business of the House.
2. It requires the support of at least 50 members to be admitted.
3. The Rajya Sabha is not permitted to make use of this device.
4. It should not revive discussion on a matter that has been discussed in the same session.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation: All the statements are correct. An Adjournment Motion is an extraordinary device that interrupts normal business, needs the support of 50 members for admission, and is restricted from use in the Rajya Sabha due to its element of censure against the government. Furthermore, one of its admissibility restrictions is that it cannot revive a discussion on a matter already debated in the same session.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q38.Consider the following statements regarding parliamentary devices:
1. Both the Zero Hour and the Calling Attention Motion are considered Indian innovations in parliamentary procedure.
2. The Zero Hour is mentioned in the Rules of Procedure, whereas the Calling Attention Motion is not.
3. The Zero Hour starts immediately after the question hour and lasts until the regular business of the House is taken up.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect. The Calling Attention Motion, in existence since 1954, is mentioned in the Rules of Procedure. In contrast, the Zero Hour, an informal device in existence since 1962, is not mentioned in the Rules of Procedure. Statements 1 and 3 are correct descriptions of these parliamentary devices.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q39.Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The passage of a No-Confidence Motion in the Lok Sabha leads to the removal of the ministry from office.
Statement II: A No-Confidence Motion is rooted in Article 75 of the Constitution, which states that the council of ministers shall be collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement I is correct; the Lok Sabha can remove the ministry by passing a no-confidence motion. Statement II is also correct; the principle behind this motion is the collective responsibility of the council of ministers to the Lok Sabha, as mandated by Article 75. Statement II provides the constitutional basis for the procedural tool mentioned in Statement I, making it the correct explanation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q40.Consider the following descriptions of Closure Motions used in Parliament:
1. Simple Closure: A member moves that the matter has been sufficiently discussed and should now be put to vote.
2. Kangaroo Closure: The undiscussed clauses of a bill are put to vote along with the discussed ones due to want of time.
3. Guillotine Closure: Only important clauses are taken up for debate and voting, and intervening clauses are skipped over.
4. Closure by Compartments: Clauses of a bill are grouped into parts, and the entire part is put to vote as a whole.
How many of the above descriptions are correctly stated?
Explanation: The descriptions for Simple Closure and Closure by Compartments are correct. However, the descriptions for Kangaroo Closure and Guillotine Closure have been interchanged. Kangaroo Closure is when only important clauses are debated, skipping intervening ones. Guillotine Closure is when undiscussed clauses are put to vote due to lack of time. Therefore, only two of the descriptions are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q41.Consider the following statements regarding the passage of an ordinary bill in the Parliament:
1. An ordinary bill can be introduced only by a minister.
2. The introduction of the bill and its publication in the Gazette constitute the second reading of the bill.
3. During the third reading, the bill is discussed clause-by-clause and amendments can be moved.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: An ordinary bill can be introduced by either a minister or a private member. The introduction and publication of the bill in the Gazette constitute the first reading, not the second. The third reading stage is confined to the acceptance or rejection of the bill as a whole, and no amendments are allowed.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q42.According to Article 110 of the Constitution, a bill is deemed to be a money bill if it contains 'only' provisions dealing with certain matters.
How many of the following are considered matters of a money bill under this definition?
1. The imposition of fines or other pecuniary penalties.
2. The regulation of the borrowing of money by the Union government.
3. The appropriation of money out of the Consolidated Fund of India.
4. The imposition of a tax by a local authority for local purposes.
Explanation: A bill is not deemed a money bill merely because it provides for the imposition of fines or the imposition of a tax by a local authority for local purposes. However, the regulation of borrowing by the Union government and the appropriation of money from the Consolidated Fund of India are defining features of a money bill. Therefore, only two of the above are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q43.Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Rajya Sabha cannot reject or amend a Money Bill; it can only make recommendations which the Lok Sabha may or may not accept.
Statement II: A Financial Bill (Category I) is treated like an ordinary bill in all respects, including its introduction in either House of Parliament.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Explanation: Statement I is correct as the Rajya Sabha's power over a Money Bill is limited to making recommendations within 14 days. Statement II is incorrect because a Financial Bill (I), similar to a Money Bill, can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and only on the recommendation of the President. In other respects, it follows the procedure of an ordinary bill.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q44.Consider the following pairs with respect to Parliamentary grants:
1. Vote of Credit : A grant for meeting an unexpected demand upon the resources of India.
2. Excess Grant : A grant for a new service not contemplated in the budget for the current year.
3. Supplementary Grant : A grant when the amount authorised for a particular service is found to be insufficient for that year.
4. Token Grant : A grant for a special purpose which forms no part of the current service of any financial year.
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
Explanation: Pair 1 is correct as a Vote of Credit is like a blank cheque for an unexpected demand. Pair 3 is correct as a Supplementary Grant is for when funds for a current service are insufficient. Pair 2 is incorrect; its description matches an Additional Grant, whereas an Excess Grant is for expenditure already incurred beyond the authorized amount. Pair 4 is incorrect; its description matches an Exceptional Grant, whereas a Token Grant is for re-appropriating funds to a new service.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q45.The budget consists of expenditure 'charged' upon the Consolidated Fund of India, which is non-votable by the Parliament.
How many of the following expenditures are 'charged' upon the Consolidated Fund of India?
1. Salaries and allowances of the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
2. Pensions of the judges of High Courts.
3. Salary, allowances and pension of the chairman and members of the Union Public Service Commission.
4. Any expenditure declared by the President to be so charged.
Explanation: The Constitution specifies certain expenditures as 'charged' on the Consolidated Fund of India, including the salaries of the presiding officers of Parliament, pensions of High Court judges, and salaries/pensions of the UPSC chairman and members. However, any other expenditure can be declared as charged only by an act of Parliament, not unilaterally by the President. Therefore, only the first three items are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q46.Consider the following powers. In
how many of the above matters does the Rajya Sabha possess exclusive or special powers not shared with the Lok Sabha?
1. Authorising the Parliament to create new All-India Services.
2. Initiating the process for the removal of the Vice-President.
3. Authorising the Parliament to make a law on a subject in the State List.
4. Approving a proclamation of emergency when the Lok Sabha is dissolved.
Explanation: The Constitution grants the Rajya Sabha certain special powers. These include: authorising Parliament to legislate on a State List subject (Article 249), authorising the creation of new All-India Services (Article 312), initiating the removal of the Vice-President (Article 67), and approving certain proclamations of emergency if the Lok Sabha is dissolved. All four listed powers are special powers of the Rajya Sabha.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q47.Which of the following factors limit the sovereignty of the Indian Parliament, distinguishing it from the British Parliament?
1. The written nature of the Constitution.
2. The federal system of government with a division of powers.
3. The system of judicial review.
4. The presence of justiciable Fundamental Rights.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Explanation: Unlike the British Parliament, the Indian Parliament is not sovereign. Its authority is limited by several constitutional features. These include: the supremacy of the written Constitution, the federal structure that divides legislative power between the Union and States, the power of the judiciary to review and strike down unconstitutional laws, and the prohibition against enacting laws that violate the Fundamental Rights guaranteed in Part III of the Constitution.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q48.Consider the following statements regarding the powers of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
1. A resolution for the discontinuance of a national emergency can be passed by either House of Parliament.
2. Both Houses have equal powers in the introduction and passage of financial bills involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund of India.
3. The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha.
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because a resolution for the discontinuance of a national emergency can only be passed by the Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is correct as both houses have equal powers for financial bills involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund (not to be confused with Money Bills). Statement 3 is incorrect because the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha, which can remove it via a no-confidence motion.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q49.Statement I: The Rajya Sabha is considered an essential part of India's federal system, protecting the interests of the states.
Statement II: The Rajya Sabha has the exclusive power to authorize the Parliament to make a law on a subject enumerated in the State List.
Explanation: Statement I is correct; one of the key roles of the Rajya Sabha is to maintain the federal equilibrium by representing the states. Statement II is also correct; under Article 249, only the Rajya Sabha can pass a resolution to empower Parliament to legislate on a state subject. This power is a prime example of its role as the council of states, directly linking its specific power to its federal character. Therefore, Statement II provides a strong explanation for Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q50.In
how many of the following matters are the powers and status of the Rajya Sabha unequal to that of the Lok Sabha?
1. Introduction of a Constitutional amendment bill.
2. Removal of the Vice-President.
3. Voting on the demands for grants in the budget.
4. Approval of a proclamation of national emergency.
Explanation: Let's analyze the powers: 1. Constitutional amendment bills: Both houses have equal powers. 2. Removal of the Vice-President: Powers are unequal as only the Rajya Sabha can initiate the process. 3. Voting on demands for grants: Powers are unequal as this is an exclusive privilege of the Lok Sabha. 4. Approval of emergency: Both houses have equal powers in approving a proclamation. Therefore, in two of the listed matters (removal of the Vice-President and voting on demands for grants), the powers are unequal.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q51.Under the Constitution of India, the Parliament is empowered to make laws on the subjects enumerated in the State List under certain abnormal circumstances. Consider the following circumstances:
1. When the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution to that effect.
2. When a proclamation of National Emergency is in operation.
3. When the President issues a directive on the advice of the Council of Ministers.
4. When necessary to give effect to international agreements, treaties, and conventions.
5. When two or more states make a joint request to the Parliament.
How many of the above circumstances are mentioned in the Constitution as empowering the Parliament to legislate on State List subjects?
Explanation: The Constitution empowers Parliament to legislate on State List subjects under five specific abnormal circumstances. The provided list includes four of them: a resolution by the Rajya Sabha, a National Emergency, giving effect to international agreements, and a joint request from two or more states. The fifth circumstance, not listed, is during President's Rule. A presidential directive is not one of these constitutionally specified conditions.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q52.Consider the following statements regarding financial procedures in the Indian Parliament:
Statement I: The 'rule of lapse' dictates that any money granted by the Parliament that remains unspent by the end of the financial year expires and returns to the Consolidated Fund of India.
Statement II: This practice, while facilitating effective parliamentary financial control, often leads to a heavy rush of expenditure towards the close of the financial year, popularly known as 'March Rush'.
Explanation: Statement I correctly defines the 'rule of lapse'. Statement II correctly identifies both the primary purpose of this rule (effective financial control by preventing unauthorized reserve funds) and its practical consequence ('March Rush'). Therefore, Statement II provides the correct context and explanation for the practice described in Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q53.The Lok Sabha can express a lack of confidence in the government through various means. Consider the following actions:
1. Passing a censure motion
2. Rejecting a money bill
3. Passing a cut motion
4. Not passing a motion of thanks on the President's inaugural address
How many of the above actions can be interpreted as the Lok Sabha expressing a lack of confidence in the government?
Explanation: All four listed actions are methods by which the Lok Sabha can signal its lack of confidence in the Council of Ministers. The defeat of the government on a money bill, a cut motion, or the motion of thanks, as well as the passage of a censure motion or an adjournment motion, are all considered expressions of no-confidence, potentially leading to the government's resignation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q54.Consider the following statements regarding the effectiveness of parliamentary control over the executive:
1. The technical nature of the demands for grants hinders effective financial scrutiny by parliamentarians who are often laymen.
2. The increased recourse to 'guillotine' has expanded the scope of financial control by ensuring all demands are discussed.
3. The frequent promulgation of ordinances by the President dilutes the Parliament's legislative powers.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as the technicality of grants is a known hindrance. Statement 3 is also correct as ordinances bypass the normal legislative process, thus diluting Parliament's power. Statement 2 is incorrect; the 'guillotine' is a procedure where undiscussed demands for grants are put to a vote, which *reduces* the scope of financial control, rather than expanding it. The question asks for the incorrect statement.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q55.With reference to the judicial powers and functions of the Parliament of India, consider the following statements:
1. It can recommend the removal of the Chief Election Commissioner to the President.
2. It can punish its members or outsiders for the breach of its privileges or its contempt.
3. It can impeach the President for the violation of the Constitution.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation: All three statements correctly describe the judicial powers of the Parliament. It can recommend the removal of high functionaries like the Chief Election Commissioner and judges. It has the power to punish for breach of its privileges, which is a quasi-judicial function. It also holds the power to impeach the President for constitutional violations.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q56.With reference to the sessions of Parliament, consider the following statements:
1. Prorogation terminates a session of the House, while adjournment only terminates a sitting.
2. The power of prorogation lies with the President of India, whereas the power of adjournment lies with the presiding officer of the House.
3. Unlike adjournment, prorogation leads to the lapse of all pending bills before the House.
Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect. Prorogation does not affect the bills or any other business pending before the House. However, all pending notices (other than those for introducing bills) lapse on prorogation. Adjournment also does not affect pending bills. Statements 1 and 2 correctly distinguish between the two procedures in terms of their effect and the authority responsible.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q57.Consider the following statements regarding parliamentary motions:
1. A Censure Motion can be moved against an individual minister, but a No-Confidence Motion can only be moved against the entire council of ministers.
2. It is mandatory to state the reasons for the adoption of a Censure Motion, but not for a No-Confidence Motion.
3. The passage of a Censure Motion in the Lok Sabha necessitates the resignation of the council of ministers.
Explanation: Statements 1 and 2 are correct. Statement 3 is incorrect. If a Censure Motion is passed in the Lok Sabha, the council of ministers need not resign from office. It is the passage of a No-Confidence Motion that requires the council of ministers to resign.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q58.Consider the following statements regarding Public and Private Bills:
1. A Public Bill can only be introduced by a minister, whereas a Private Bill can be introduced by any member of Parliament other than a minister.
2. The introduction of a Public Bill requires a seven-day notice, while a Private Bill requires a one-month notice.
3. The rejection of a Public Bill by the House has no implication on the government, similar to the rejection of a Private Bill.
Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect. The rejection of a Public Bill (introduced by a minister) by the House is a significant event, amounting to parliamentary disapproval of the government's policy, and may lead to the resignation of the government. In contrast, the rejection of a Private Bill has no such implication. Statements 1 and 2 correctly state the differences in who can introduce the bills and the required notice period.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard
Q59.Which of the following statements regarding the legislative process for a Money Bill is/are NOT correct?
1. It can be introduced in either House of Parliament, but only by a minister.
2. The Rajya Sabha must return the bill, with or without recommendations, to the Lok Sabha within 14 days.
3. The President of India can return a Money Bill for the reconsideration of the Parliament.
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because a Money Bill can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is incorrect because the President can either give assent or withhold assent to a Money Bill but cannot return it for reconsideration. Statement 2 is a correct description of the Rajya Sabha's limited role concerning a Money Bill.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium
Q60.Consider the following pairs regarding the allocation of seats in the Indian Parliament:
1. Gujarat : 26 Lok Sabha Seats
2. Karnataka : 12 Rajya Sabha Seats
3. West Bengal : 40 Lok Sabha Seats
4. Bihar : 18 Rajya Sabha Seats
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Explanation: Based on the provided data: Pair 1 is correct (Gujarat has 26 Lok Sabha seats). Pair 2 is correct (Karnataka has 12 Rajya Sabha seats). Pair 3 is incorrect (West Bengal has 42 Lok Sabha seats). Pair 4 is incorrect (Bihar has 16 Rajya Sabha seats). Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairsmedium
Q61.Consider the following statements regarding the office of the Deputy Speaker, in light of the functioning of the 17th Lok Sabha:
1. Article 93 of the Constitution mandates that the Lok Sabha shall, as soon as may be, choose a Speaker and a Deputy Speaker.
2. The 17th Lok Sabha was the first in Indian parliamentary history to function for its entire five-year term without electing a Deputy Speaker.
3. The Constitution specifies a strict timeline within which the election of the Deputy Speaker must be completed after the first sitting of the Lok Sabha.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as Article 93 explicitly states this. Statement 2 is also correct, as the provided current affairs analysis highlights this unprecedented situation in the 17th Lok Sabha. Statement 3 is incorrect; the phrase 'as soon as may be' in Article 93 is a directive but does not prescribe a specific, mandatory timeline, which was a point of contention during the 17th Lok Sabha's term. Therefore, only two statements are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q62.Following the controversy over the non-selection of certain states' tableaux for the 2024 Republic Day parade, a group of opposition MPs decides to hold the government accountable in the Lok Sabha. Considering the available parliamentary procedures, analyze the following statements:
1. They can move a Censure Motion specifically against the Minister of Defence and the Minister of Culture, citing the 'biased and non-transparent' selection process as the reason.
2. They can move a No-Confidence Motion, which, if passed, would censure the government for its specific policy on tableau selection but not require its resignation.
3. If a Public Bill introduced by the Minister of Defence concerning the new rotational tableau plan is defeated, it is considered a parliamentary disapproval that may lead to the government's resignation.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; a Censure Motion can be moved against individual or a group of ministers for specific policies and must state the reasons. Statement 2 is incorrect; a No-Confidence Motion does not require reasons, but its passage *mandates* the resignation of the entire council of ministers. Statement 3 is correct; the defeat of a Public Bill introduced by a minister is a significant blow to the government and can lead to its resignation, as it reflects a loss of confidence in the House.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairsmedium
Q63.Considering the recent discussions on reviving Private Members' Bills (PMBs), which have been described as a 'gold mine' for democracy, analyze the following statements that differentiate them from Public Bills:
1. A Private Member's Bill requires a one-month notice for introduction, whereas a Public Bill requires only a seven-day notice.
2. The drafting of a PMB is the responsibility of the concerned government department in consultation with the law department.
3. The rejection of a PMB in the House has no implication on the government's stability, unlike a Public Bill whose rejection may lead to the government's resignation.
4. A PMB can be introduced by any Member of Parliament, including those nominated by the President, as long as they are not a minister.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as per the static data. Statement 2 is incorrect; the drafting of a PMB is the responsibility of the member introducing it. Statement 3 is correct; the rejection of a PMB has no implication on the government, while the rejection of a Public Bill can be a vote of no-confidence. Statement 4 is correct; a private member is any MP (elected or nominated) who is not a minister. Therefore, three statements (1, 3, and 4) are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q64.Considering the recent discussions on replacing the First-Past-The-Post (FPTP) system with Proportional Representation (PR) for Lok Sabha elections, analyze the following arguments:
1. The concern that PR systems can lead to unstable coalition governments echoes the Constituent Assembly's original apprehension about the system's unsuitability for a parliamentary government.
2. The argument that PR systems are more complex for voters to understand aligns with a primary reason cited in the Constitution for not adopting it, considering the low literacy scale at the time.
3. The current debate highlights that PR systems are less susceptible to gerrymandering, a problem that was a primary consideration for the framers of the Constitution when they chose the FPTP system.
4. The Law Commission's proposal for a Mixed-Member Proportional Representation (MMPR) system suggests using the 1971 census for seat allocation to maintain federal balance.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. The static text mentions that a reason for not adopting PR was its 'unsuitability to the parliamentary government due to the tendency of the system to multiply political parties leading to instability'. The current affairs text notes a disadvantage of PR is that it 'can lead to unstable governments'. Statement 2 is correct. The static text cites 'Difficulty for the voters to understand the system (which is complicated) due to low literacy scale' as a primary reason for rejection. The current affairs text also lists 'More Complex' as a disadvantage of PR. Statement 3 is incorrect. While the current affairs text mentions PR reduces gerrymandering, this was not a primary consideration for the framers when choosing FPTP; their main concerns were simplicity and stability. Statement 4 is incorrect. The Law Commission report did not suggest using the 1971 census; it recommended increasing the Lok Sabha's strength. The current debate on the upcoming delimitation exercise is where the issue of census data (post-2026 vs. 1971) is most relevant. Therefore, only two statements are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q65.Considering the recent instances of cross-voting in the 2024 Rajya Sabha elections, evaluate the following statements:
1. An MLA who cross-votes in a Rajya Sabha election can be immediately disqualified from the State Legislative Assembly under the Tenth Schedule (Anti-Defection Law).
2. The vote of an MLA from a political party is considered invalid if they show their marked ballot paper to an agent of another party.
3. The Constitution of India explicitly fixes the term of office for a member of the Rajya Sabha at six years.
4. Following the 2024 Supreme Court ruling, an MLA accepting a bribe to cross-vote in a Rajya Sabha election is protected from criminal prosecution by parliamentary immunity.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because the Supreme Court in the Kuldip Nayar case (2006) and the Election Commission have clarified that the anti-defection law under the Tenth Schedule does not apply to Rajya Sabha elections. Statement 2 is correct; the 2003 amendment to the Representation of the People Act, 1951, introduced an open ballot system where an MLA must show their ballot to their own party's authorized agent, and showing it to anyone else disqualifies the vote. Statement 3 is incorrect; the Constitution left the term to be decided by Parliament, which then fixed it at six years via the Representation of the People Act (1951). Statement 4 is incorrect; in March 2024, a seven-judge bench of the Supreme Court overruled the 1998 JMM bribery case judgment, holding that parliamentary privilege does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution for bribery. Therefore, only one statement is correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q66.Considering the recent Supreme Court observations on delays in deciding defection cases, evaluate the correctness of the following statements regarding the authority to disqualify a Member of Parliament (MP):
1. The President of India's decision is final on whether an MP is subject to disqualifications mentioned in the Representation of the People Act (1951), and this decision must be based on the Election Commission's opinion.
2. The question of an MP's disqualification on the ground of defection is exclusively decided by the Presiding Officer of the House, and their decision is final and immune from judicial review as per the original Tenth Schedule.
3. The 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) suggested that the power to decide defection cases should be transferred from the Speaker to the President, who would act on the advice of the Election Commission.
4. An MP can be disqualified for voluntarily giving up party membership even without a formal resignation, as interpreted by the Supreme Court in the Ravi S. Naik v. Union of India (1994) case.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as per the static text. Statement 2 is incorrect because the Supreme Court in the Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu (1992) case ruled that the Presiding Officer's decision is subject to judicial review, striking down the provision of finality. Statement 3 is correct as mentioned in the current affairs text as a proposed reform. Statement 4 is correct, as confirmed by the Ravi S. Naik case mentioned in the current affairs text. Therefore, statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct, making a total of three correct statements.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q67.With reference to the sources of Parliamentary Privileges in India, consider the following statements:
1. Constitutional provisions, such as Article 105, form a primary source.
2. Judicial interpretations, including the 2024 Supreme Court ruling in the Sita Soren case, continuously shape the scope of these privileges.
3. A comprehensive law codifying all privileges was enacted by Parliament following the recommendations of the Committee of Privileges in 2008.
4. The Parliament of Canada Act, 1985, is explicitly mentioned in the Indian Constitution as a guiding framework until Indian laws are made.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as Article 105 is the foundational constitutional provision for parliamentary privileges. Statement 2 is correct as judicial interpretations are a key source, and the recent Sita Soren case is a prime example. Statement 3 is incorrect; both the static and current affairs texts clarify that privileges have not been codified, and the 2008 committee actually recommended against it. Statement 4 is incorrect; while the Constitution originally referred to the British House of Commons, it never referred to Canadian law. The reference to the Parliament of Canada Act is only for comparative purposes in the provided text.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q68.In the context of the recent discussions about moving a resolution for the removal of the Vice-President, consider the following statements regarding the constitutional procedure:
1. The resolution for the removal of the Vice-President must be initiated in the Rajya Sabha.
2. The resolution must be passed in the Rajya Sabha by a majority of all the then members of the House.
3. The Lok Sabha must agree to the resolution passed by the Rajya Sabha, which is interpreted as requiring a simple majority.
4. A minimum of 14 days' advance notice is mandatory before the resolution can be moved in the Rajya Sabha.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: All four statements are correct. Article 67(b) of the Constitution outlines the removal process for the Vice-President. The process must be initiated in the Rajya Sabha with a resolution passed by an effective majority (a majority of all the then members). A 14-day advance notice is required. The resolution must then be 'agreed to' by the Lok Sabha, which implies a simple majority.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q69.In the context of declining legislative productivity and frequent disruptions as highlighted in recent reports, consider the following statements regarding the powers of the Lok Sabha Speaker to manage the House:
1. The Speaker's decision to adjourn the House or suspend a meeting due to a lack of quorum is final and cannot be challenged in court.
2. The Speaker can permit a member to address the House in their mother-tongue, which facilitates broader participation despite official language provisions.
3. When a resolution for the Speaker's own removal is under consideration, they can vote in the first instance but cannot exercise a casting vote.
4. The Speaker's power to maintain order and decorum is subject to judicial review to ensure it is not used to suppress opposition voices.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; maintaining order and decorum, including adjourning for lack of quorum, is a primary responsibility where the Speaker's power is final. Statement 2 is correct; the presiding officer can permit a member to use their mother tongue. Statement 3 is correct; during a removal resolution, the Speaker can vote like a regular member in the first instance but loses the right to a casting vote. Statement 4 is incorrect; the static text explicitly states that the Speaker's powers of regulating procedure or maintaining order are not subject to the jurisdiction of any Court, ensuring the independence of the legislature's internal proceedings.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q70.With reference to the recent formation of a 'shadow cabinet' in Odisha and the established parliamentary practices in India, consider the following statements:
1. The office of the Leader of the Opposition is a constitutional post, similar to the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
2. The institution of a 'Shadow Cabinet' is based on parliamentary conventions and is not mentioned in the Constitution of India or any Parliamentary Statute.
3. The Leader of the Opposition is entitled to salary and allowances equivalent to that of a cabinet minister, a provision established by a Parliamentary Statute.
4. In the British system, the Leader of the Opposition is often called the 'alternative Prime Minister', a concept that underpins the function of a Shadow Cabinet.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect. The static text and current affairs article clarify that the Leader of the Opposition is a statutory post, recognized under the Salary and Allowances of Leaders of Opposition in Parliament Act, 1977, not a constitutional post. The Speaker's office, however, is provided for in the Constitution. Statement 2 is correct; both texts confirm that the 'Shadow Cabinet' is a convention of parliamentary government, not a formal institution under Indian law. Statement 3 is correct; the 1977 Act accords the LoP the status and facilities of a cabinet minister. Statement 4 is correct; the static text mentions Ivor Jennings describing the LoP as the 'alternative Prime Minister', which is the core idea behind a Shadow Cabinet as an alternative government-in-waiting.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q71.In light of the recent discussions surrounding the vacancy of the Deputy Speaker's office in the Lok Sabha, consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution of India explicitly mandates that the post of Deputy Speaker must be offered to the main opposition party to ensure institutional balance.
2. The date for the election of the Deputy Speaker is fixed by the President of India, similar to the process for the Speaker.
3. When presiding over a joint sitting of Parliament in the Speaker's absence, the Deputy Speaker assumes all the powers of the Speaker.
4. The Deputy Speaker, upon being appointed as a member of any parliamentary committee, automatically becomes its chairman.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; it is a convention, not a constitutional mandate, to offer the Deputy Speaker's post to the opposition. The current affairs text notes this is a convention from the 11th Lok Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect; the static text and current affairs note clearly state that the Speaker fixes the date for the election of the Deputy Speaker, whereas the President fixes the date for the Speaker's election. Statement 3 is correct; the static text confirms that the Deputy Speaker presides over a joint sitting in the Speaker's absence and assumes all his powers. Statement 4 is correct; this is a special privilege of the Deputy Speaker mentioned in the static text. Therefore, only two statements (3 and 4) are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q72.Consider the legislative process for the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which includes a controversial proposal to re-criminalize adultery. If the debate on this specific provision becomes excessively long, the Speaker might employ various Closure Motions to conclude the discussion. In this context, consider the following types of motions:
1. Guillotine Closure: Undiscussed clauses of the BNS, including the adultery provision, are put to vote as the allotted time expires.
2. Kangaroo Closure: Only important clauses of the BNS, such as the one on adultery, are taken up for debate and voting, while intervening clauses are skipped.
3. Closure by Compartments: The clauses of the lengthy BNS bill are grouped into parts, and each part is debated and voted on as a whole.
4. Simple Closure: A member moves that the debate on the adultery clause has been sufficient and it should now be put to vote.
How many of the above procedural actions are valid types of Closure Motions that could be applied?
Explanation: All four are valid types of Closure Motions mentioned in parliamentary procedure. Guillotine Closure is used when time runs out. Kangaroo Closure allows for skipping less important clauses. Closure by Compartments involves grouping clauses of a long bill. Simple Closure is a motion to end a debate that is deemed sufficient. All could theoretically be used during the passage of a complex bill like the BNS.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q73.A recent news report highlighted the erosion of Question Hour's effectiveness, noting it operated only 60% of the time in the 17th Lok Sabha. In this context of declining parliamentary oversight, consider the following statements about Question Hour and its associated procedures:
1. A question distinguished by an asterisk (Starred Question) requires a written answer, and therefore, supplementary questions cannot follow.
2. Questions can be addressed to private members if the subject matter relates to a Bill or resolution for which that member is responsible.
3. The Zero Hour, which starts immediately after the Question Hour, is an Indian innovation that is explicitly mentioned in the Rules of Procedure.
4. The list of questions to be asked to private members is printed on yellow-coloured paper to distinguish it from other types of questions.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; a Starred Question requires an oral answer, and supplementary questions can follow. Statement 3 is incorrect; while Zero Hour is an Indian innovation, it is an informal device and is not mentioned in the Rules of Procedure. Statements 2 and 4 are correct as per the static text, which details the procedure for questions to private members and the colour-coding of parliamentary papers.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q74.In the context of the Prime Minister's reply to the Motion of Thanks in February 2024, consider the following statements regarding its procedural and political implications:
1. The defeat of the Motion of Thanks in the Lok Sabha is considered a defeat of the government, as the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the House.
2. Unlike a No-Confidence Motion, a Censure Motion can be moved against an individual minister, whereas the defeat of the Motion of Thanks implies censure of the entire Council of Ministers.
3. If amendments proposed by the opposition during the Motion of Thanks debate are passed in the Lok Sabha, the government is constitutionally obligated to resign.
4. The Rajya Sabha can also express a lack of confidence in the government by defeating the Motion of Thanks, leading to the government's fall.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; the Motion of Thanks must be passed, otherwise it amounts to the defeat of the government. Statement 2 is correct; it accurately distinguishes the scope of a Censure Motion from the implications of a defeated Motion of Thanks, which affects the entire government. Statement 3 is incorrect; if amendments are passed, the motion is adopted in its amended form. This is politically embarrassing but does not constitutionally obligate the government to resign. Statement 4 is incorrect; as per Article 75, the Council of Ministers is collectively responsible only to the Lok Sabha. The defeat of the motion in the Rajya Sabha does not lead to the government's resignation.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q75.The recent Supreme Court decision to examine the use of the Money Bill route brings Article 110 into focus. Considering the provisions mentioned in the Constitution, which of the following, if included in a bill, would NOT be sufficient on its own to classify it as a Money Bill?
1. A provision for the imposition of fines or other pecuniary penalties.
2. A provision empowering the government to notify rules regarding the service conditions of members of a tribunal.
3. A provision for the imposition, abolition, or regulation of a tax by a local authority for local purposes.
4. A provision for the appropriation of money out of the Contingency Fund of India.
How many of the above statements are correct?
Explanation: Statement 4 is incorrect. A Money Bill is concerned with appropriation of money out of the Consolidated Fund of India, not the Contingency Fund. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct. The Constitution explicitly states that a bill is not a Money Bill merely because it provides for the imposition of fines (Statement 1) or for the imposition of a tax by a local authority (Statement 3). Statement 2, concerning service conditions of tribunal members, was a key part of the controversy around the Finance Act, 2017, as it is a matter of general legislation, not a financial matter as defined under Article 110. Therefore, three statements are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard
Q76.Considering the legal and constitutional framework governing Members of Parliament, which of the following statements is NOT correct?
1. The Constitution of India empowers Parliament to determine the salaries of its members, but it does not contain an explicit provision for their pension.
2. The salaries and allowances of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India and are therefore not subject to the annual vote of Parliament.
3. While many parliamentary privileges are based on conventions derived from the British House of Commons, the freedom from arrest in civil cases during a parliamentary session is explicitly granted by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
4. The sumptuary allowance for the Speaker of the Lok Sabha is determined under the same Act that governs the salaries of all Members of Parliament, namely the Salaries, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954.
Explanation: Statement 4 is incorrect. The sumptuary allowance for the Speaker is determined by the Salaries and Allowances of Officers of Parliament Act, 1953, not the Salaries, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954. Statement 1 is correct as the Constitution allows Parliament to determine salaries but makes no mention of pensions, which were later provided by an Act. Statement 2 is correct as the salaries of Officers of Parliament are charged on the CFI. Statement 3 is correct as mentioned in the current affairs text regarding the sources of privileges.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
73 answers locked
You've used your 3 free answers in Indian Polity. Verify your phone to unlock 20 more — free.
Unlock All Questions
All questions with explanations, AI notes and a personalised revision calendar — in the free app.