Question 1

Statement I: The system of Panchayati Raj in India was granted constitutional status through the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act of 1992.
Statement II: The primary objective of establishing Panchayati Raj was to centralize rural development under the Union government's direct control.

Accepted Answer

Statement I is correct, but Statement II is incorrect.. Statement I is correct as the 73rd Amendment constitutionalised Panchayati Raj. Statement II is incorrect because the system aims to build democracy at the grass-root level, signifying decentralization, not centralization of rural development.

Question 2

Consider the following statements regarding Panchayati Raj in India:
1. It signifies the system of urban local self-government.
2. Its establishment in states is mandated by Acts of the Parliament of India.
3. A key function entrusted to it is rural development.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statement 1 is incorrect as Panchayati Raj pertains to rural, not urban, local self-government. Statement 2 is incorrect as these institutions are established by Acts of state legislatures, not the Parliament. Statement 3 is correct. The question asks for incorrect statements.

Question 3

With reference to the Panchayati Raj system in India, consider the following statements:
1. It is a system of rural local self-government.
2. It was constitutionalised by the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act.
3. It is established uniformly across all states by a single central Act.
4. Its primary goal is to build democracy at the grass root level.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three. Panchayati Raj is a system of rural local self-government (Statement 1), constitutionalised by the 73rd Amendment (Statement 2), with the goal of building grass-root democracy (Statement 4). However, it is established by individual Acts of state legislatures, not a single central Act (Statement 3 is incorrect). Thus, three statements are correct.

Question 4

With reference to the legal framework for Panchayati Raj in India,
which of the following statements is correct?

Accepted Answer

It has been established in all states by the Acts of the respective state legislatures.. The system of Panchayati Raj is established in the states of India through Acts passed by their respective state legislatures, as provided for by the constitutional framework established by the 73rd Amendment Act.

Question 5

Consider the following pairs:
1. Panchayati Raj : System of urban local self-government
2. 73rd Amendment Act, 1992 : Constitutionalisation of Panchayati Raj
3. State Legislatures : Body responsible for enacting Panchayati Raj laws
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is incorrect as Panchayati Raj is for rural, not urban, areas. Pair 2 is correct as the 73rd Amendment gave constitutional status to Panchayati Raj. Pair 3 is correct as state legislatures are empowered to pass laws to establish and govern these institutions. Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.

Question 6

Consider the following pairs:
1. Committee on Panchayati Raj Elections : K. Santhanam
2. Study Team on Nyaya Panchayats : G.R. Rajgopal
3. Study Team on the Position of Gram Sabha : R.R. Diwakar
4. Committee on Rationalisation of Panchayat Statistics : S.D. Mishra
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only three pairs. Pair 1 is correct: The K. Santhanam Committee on Panchayati Raj Elections was formed in 1965. Pair 2 is correct: The G.R. Rajgopal Study Team on Nyaya Panchayats was formed in 1962. Pair 3 is correct: The R.R. Diwakar Study Team on the Position of Gram Sabha was formed in 1963. Pair 4 is incorrect: The Committee on Rationalisation of Panchayat Statistics (1960) was chaired by V.R. Rao, not S.D. Mishra. S.D. Mishra chaired the Working Group on Panchayats and Cooperatives (1961). Therefore, only three pairs are correctly matched.

Question 7

Consider the following two statements:
Statement I: The G.V.K. Rao Committee (1985) observed that the development process was increasingly bureaucratised and disconnected from Panchayati Raj institutions, terming this situation as 'grass without roots'.
Statement II: A key recommendation of the G.V.K. Rao Committee was to reduce the developmental role of the District Collector and assign a major role to Panchayati Raj in development administration, differing from the Hanumantha Rao Committee which advocated a significant role for the Collector.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement I is a direct summary of the G.V.K. Rao Committee's findings on the bureaucratisation of development, which it called 'grass without roots'. Statement II describes the committee's core recommendation to counter this trend by empowering Panchayati Raj institutions at the expense of the bureaucracy (represented by the District Collector). This recommendation directly addresses the problem identified in Statement I, making Statement II the correct explanation for Statement I.

Question 8

With reference to the recommendations of the Ashok Mehta Committee (1977), consider the following statements:
1. It recommended the replacement of the three-tier system of Panchayati Raj with a two-tier system.
2. It proposed that Nyaya Panchayats should be kept as separate bodies presided over by a qualified judge.
3. It recommended that the District Collector should be the chairman of the Zila Parishad.
4. It was the first major committee to recommend constitutional recognition for Panchayati Raj institutions.
Which of the statements given above is NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statement 3 is incorrect. The recommendation that the District Collector should be the chairman of the Zila Parishad was made by the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee (1957), not the Ashok Mehta Committee. The Ashok Mehta Committee recommended that the Zila Parishad should be the executive body for planning at the district level. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are all correct recommendations of the Ashok Mehta Committee.

Question 9

As per the recommendations of the Balwant Rai Mehta Committee, consider the following institutional arrangements for Panchayati Raj:
1. The Panchayat Samiti should be the executive body.
2. The Zila Parishad should be the advisory, coordinating, and supervisory body.
3. The Village Panchayat should be constituted with indirectly elected representatives.
4. The District Collector should be the chairman of the Zila Parishad.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three statements. Statement 3 is incorrect. The Balwant Rai Mehta Committee recommended that the village panchayat should be constituted with directly elected representatives. The Panchayat Samiti and Zila Parishad were to be constituted with indirectly elected members. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are all correct recommendations made by the committee regarding the institutional roles and design. Therefore, only three statements are correct.

Question 10

Consider the following recommendations made by various committees on Panchayati Raj:
1. The L.M. Singhvi Committee recommended the establishment of judicial tribunals in each state to adjudicate election disputes.
2. The Ashok Mehta Committee recommended that the Chief Electoral Officer of a state, in consultation with the Chief Election Commissioner, should conduct panchayat elections.
3. The V.N. Gadgil Committee recommended the establishment of a State Finance Commission for the allocation of finances to the Panchayats.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1, 2 and 3. All three statements are correct. The L.M. Singhvi Committee (1986) indeed recommended judicial tribunals for election disputes. The Ashok Mehta Committee (1978) recommended a specific mechanism for conducting elections involving the state CEO and the CEC. The V.N. Gadgil Committee (1988) recommended the creation of a State Finance Commission. These recommendations were foundational for later constitutional amendments.

Question 11

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutionalization of Panchayati Raj Institutions:
1. The 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill was introduced by the National Front Government under V.P. Singh.
2. The 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill, though passed by the Lok Sabha, was defeated in the Rajya Sabha.
3. The bill that finally became the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act was introduced during the prime ministership of P.V. Narasimha Rao.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

2 and 3 only. Statement 1 is incorrect; the 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill was introduced by the Rajiv Gandhi Government in 1989. Statement 2 is correct; the bill was passed by the Lok Sabha but was not approved by the Rajya Sabha. Statement 3 is correct; the Congress Government under P.V. Narasimha Rao introduced a modified bill in 1991, which eventually became the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992.

Question 12

Consider the following provisions related to the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992:
1. Granting financial powers to Panchayats to levy, collect, and appropriate taxes.
2. Reservation of one-third of seats for women in panchayats at all levels.
3. Establishment of a State Election Commission.
4. Providing reservation of seats for backward classes in panchayats.
How many of the above are listed as compulsory (mandatory) provisions of the Act?

Accepted Answer

Only two. The provisions can be categorized as compulsory or voluntary. Reservation of seats for women (2) and the establishment of a State Election Commission (3) are compulsory provisions. Granting financial powers to levy taxes (1) and providing reservation for backward classes (4) are voluntary provisions, left to the discretion of the state legislatures. Therefore, only two of the listed provisions are compulsory.

Question 13

With reference to the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, consider the following statements:
1. The Act added a new Part-IX to the Constitution, entitled 'The Panchayats'.
2. The Eleventh Schedule, added by the Act, contains 29 functional items and is linked to Article 243-G.
3. The provisions of Part IX of the Constitution are enumerated in Articles 243 to 243 ZG.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. The 73rd Amendment Act did add Part IX ('The Panchayats') and the Eleventh Schedule (containing 29 items, related to Article 243-G). Statement 3 is incorrect; the provisions of Part IX, 'The Panchayats', consist of Articles 243 to 243 O. The articles from 243 P to 243 ZG relate to Part IX-A, 'The Municipalities', which was added by the 74th Amendment Act.

Question 14

With reference to the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution, consider the following items:
1. Minor forest produce
2. Rural electrification
3. Higher education
4. Public distribution system
5. Maintenance of community assets
How many of the above functional items are placed within the purview of panchayats?

Accepted Answer

Only four. The Eleventh Schedule lists 29 functional items for panchayats. Among the given options, 'Minor forest produce', 'Rural electrification', 'Public distribution system', and 'Maintenance of community assets' are explicitly mentioned. 'Higher education' is not on the list; the item mentioned is 'Education, including primary and secondary schools'. Therefore, four of the listed items are correct.

Question 15

Given below are two statements:
Statement I: The 73rd Amendment Act mandates direct elections for all seats for members in panchayats at the village, intermediate, and district levels.
Statement II: The Act makes it a voluntary provision for the states to determine the manner of election of the chairperson of the village panchayat.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is NOT the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement I is correct as the direct election for all seats for members at all three levels is a compulsory provision of the 73rd Amendment Act. Statement II is also correct because determining the manner of election of the chairperson of the village panchayat is a voluntary provision left to the discretion of the states. However, Statement II does not explain Statement I; they are two distinct provisions of the Act concerning institutional design, one compulsory and one voluntary.

Question 16

With reference to the election of members and chairpersons in the Panchayati Raj system, consider the following statements:
1. All members of panchayats at the village, intermediate, and district levels are elected directly by the people.
2. The chairperson of a panchayat at the village level is elected indirectly by and from amongst the elected members.
3. The chairpersons of panchayats at the intermediate and district levels are elected indirectly by and from amongst the elected members thereof.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is correct as all members at all three levels are directly elected. Statement 3 is also correct. However, Statement 2 is incorrect because the manner of election for the chairperson of a village-level panchayat is determined by the state legislature, not mandated to be indirect.

Question 17

Consider the following statements regarding reservation of seats in Panchayats:
1. The act mandates the reservation of not less than one-third of the total number of offices of chairpersons for women at each level.
2. The act authorises the state legislature to make provisions for reservation of seats in favour of backward classes.
3. The provision for reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes is not applicable to the state of Arunachal Pradesh.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

None. All three statements are correct. The act provides for at least one-third reservation for women in both seats and chairperson offices. It authorises, but does not mandate, the state legislature to provide for OBC reservation. Due to its unique demographic composition, Arunachal Pradesh is exempt from the SC reservation requirement in panchayats.

Question 18

With reference to the duration and dissolution of a Panchayat, consider the following statements:
1. A Panchayat reconstituted after premature dissolution continues for the full five-year term.
2. In case of dissolution, fresh elections must be completed before the expiry of six months from the date of dissolution.
3. If the remainder of the period for a dissolved panchayat is less than six months, it is not necessary to hold an election to constitute a new panchayat for that period.
4. A person can be disqualified from being a member of a panchayat if they are less than 25 years of age, even if they have attained the age of 21 years.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two statements. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Statement 1 is incorrect; a reconstituted panchayat serves only for the remainder of the period. Statement 4 is incorrect; the act explicitly states that no person shall be disqualified on the ground that he is less than 25 years of age if he has attained the age of 21 years. Therefore, only two statements are correct.

Question 19

Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 243A : Gram Sabha
2. Article 243D : Duration of panchayats
3. Article 243I : Constitution of finance commission
4. Article 243K : Elections to the panchayats
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only three pairs. Pair 1 (Article 243A - Gram Sabha), Pair 3 (Article 243I - Finance Commission), and Pair 4 (Article 243K - Elections) are correctly matched. Pair 2 is incorrect; Article 243D deals with Reservation of seats, while Duration of panchayats is covered under Article 243E. Thus, three pairs are correctly matched.

Question 20

Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The superintendence, direction, and control of all elections to the panchayats are vested in a State Election Commission.
Statement II: The State Election Commissioner is appointed by the Governor but can be removed only in the manner prescribed for the removal of a judge of a state high court.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.. Both statements are factually correct. Statement I defines the primary function of the State Election Commission. Statement II describes the appointment and removal process for the Commissioner, which ensures the independence of the office. While both relate to the State Election Commission, the secure tenure in Statement II is a feature that supports the function in Statement I, but it does not explain why the function is vested in the commission. They are two distinct, correct provisions.

Question 21

With reference to the State Finance Commission (SFC), consider its mandated recommendations to the Governor.
How many of the following are among the principles the SFC is required to recommend?
1. The distribution of net tax proceeds between the state and the panchayats.
2. The determination of taxes and fees that may be assigned to the panchayats.
3. The measures needed to augment the consolidated fund of a state to supplement the resources of the panchayats.
4. The grants-in-aid to be given to the panchayats from the consolidated fund of the state.

Accepted Answer

Only three. The State Finance Commission (SFC) recommends principles for: (a) distribution of net tax proceeds between state and panchayats, (b) determination of taxes to be assigned to panchayats, and (c) grants-in-aid from the state's consolidated fund. The suggestion for measures to augment the state's consolidated fund to supplement panchayat resources is made by the Central Finance Commission, not the SFC.

Question 22

Consider the following statements regarding the financial powers of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs):
Statement I: The state legislature is empowered to authorise a panchayat to levy, collect, and appropriate taxes, duties, tolls, and fees.
Statement II: Despite being constitutionally mandated bodies, many Panchayats are reluctant to exercise their fiscal powers to levy and collect taxes from their own constituents.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement I is correct as the text specifies that the state legislature may authorise panchayats to levy taxes. Statement II is also correct, as the text notes that very few Panchayats use their fiscal power, with heads citing the difficulty of taxing their own community. However, Statement II explains a practical challenge in exercising a granted power, not the constitutional basis for the power described in Statement I. Therefore, both are correct but II does not explain I.

Question 23

Consider the following statements regarding the financial framework of Panchayati Raj:
1. The Governor of a state constitutes a finance commission every five years to review the financial position of the panchayats.
2. The recommendations of the State Finance Commission, along with the action taken report, are placed before the state legislature by the Governor.
3. The composition and required qualifications of the members of the State Finance Commission are determined by the Governor.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statements 1 and 2 are correct descriptions of the procedure. The Governor constitutes the State Finance Commission (SFC) every five years and places its report before the state legislature. Statement 3 is incorrect because the text explicitly states that the 'state legislature may provide for the composition of the commission, the required qualifications of its members and the manner of their selection', not the Governor.

Question 24

Consider the following pairs regarding the nomenclature of intermediate-level Panchayati Raj Institutions in different states:
1. Gujarat : Taluka Panchayat
2. Uttar Pradesh : Kshetra Panchayat
3. Andhra Pradesh : Anchal Samiti
4. Kerala : Panchayat Union
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Based on the provided table: Pair 1 (Gujarat: Taluka Panchayat) is correct. Pair 2 (Uttar Pradesh: Kshetra Panchayat) is correct. Pair 3 is incorrect; the intermediate level in Andhra Pradesh is Mandal Parishad, while Anchal Samiti is found in Arunachal Pradesh. Pair 4 is incorrect; the intermediate level in Kerala is Block Panchayat, while Panchayat Union is found in Tamil Nadu. Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.

Question 25

With reference to the financial framework of Panchayats, consider the following statements:
1. The state legislature is empowered to provide for the constitution of funds for crediting all moneys of the panchayats.
2. The Central Finance Commission directly recommends the grants-in-aid to be given to panchayats from the consolidated fund of the state.
3. The state legislature may make provisions with respect to the auditing of accounts maintained by the panchayats.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is correct; the state legislature can provide for the constitution of funds for panchayats. Statement 3 is also correct; the state legislature can make provisions for the auditing of panchayat accounts. Statement 2 is incorrect; it is the State Finance Commission that recommends grants-in-aid from the state's consolidated fund. The Central Finance Commission's role is to suggest measures to augment the state's consolidated fund to supplement the resources of the panchayats.

Question 26

Under the Provisions of the Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), the Gram Sabha or Panchayats at the appropriate level are endowed with specific powers. Consider the following powers:
1. Ownership of minor forest produce
2. To grant prospecting licenses for major minerals
3. To manage village markets
4. To exercise control over money lending to the Scheduled Tribes
How many of the above powers are specifically endowed to them by the PESA Act?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The PESA Act endows the Gram Sabha/Panchayats with ownership of minor forest produce, the power to manage village markets, and control over money lending. However, their role regarding minerals is limited to providing mandatory recommendations for prospecting licenses or mining leases for *minor* minerals, not granting licenses for *major* minerals. Therefore, statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct.

Question 27

With reference to the constitutional exceptions to the applicability of Part IX (The Panchayats), consider the following statements:
1. The provisions of Part IX are not applicable to the states of Nagaland, Meghalaya, and Mizoram.
2. The act does not apply to the hill areas of Assam for which district councils exist.
3. The President may direct that the provisions of Part IX would apply to a Union territory subject to specified exceptions and modifications.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 2 is incorrect. The constitutional exception applies to the hill areas of *Manipur* for which district councils exist, not Assam. Statements 1 and 3 are correct descriptions of the exceptions to Part IX. The question asks for the incorrect statement.

Question 28

Consider the following statements regarding reservations under the PESA Act, 1996:
Statement I: In every Panchayat in the Scheduled Areas, the reservation of seats for the Scheduled Tribes shall not be less than one-half of the total number of seats.
Statement II: The PESA Act, 1996, mandates that all seats of Chairpersons of Panchayats at all levels in the Scheduled Areas shall be reserved for the Scheduled Tribes.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is NOT the correct explanation for Statement I.. Both statements are factually correct provisions of the PESA Act. Statement I deals with the quantum of reservation for ST members in a Panchayat (at least 50%). Statement II deals with the reservation of the Chairperson's post at all levels for STs. While both relate to reservation for STs, one is not a direct explanation or cause of the other; they are two distinct and concurrent mandates of the Act.

Question 29

With reference to the powers of the Gram Sabha in Scheduled Areas under the PESA Act, 1996, consider the following statements:
1. The recommendations of the Gram Sabha are mandatory for the grant of a mining lease for minor minerals.
2. The Gram Sabha is responsible for the identification of beneficiaries under poverty alleviation programmes.
3. The actual planning and implementation of development projects in the Scheduled Areas are coordinated by the Gram Sabha.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statement 1 is correct as the Act makes the Gram Sabha's recommendation mandatory for mining leases of minor minerals. Statement 2 is also correct as the Gram Sabha is responsible for identifying beneficiaries. Statement 3 is incorrect; while the Gram Sabha must be consulted before land acquisition, the Act specifies that the actual planning and implementation of projects are coordinated at the state level.

Question 30

The PESA Act, 1996, extends the provisions of Part IX of the Constitution to the Fifth Schedule Areas. As per the text (2019 data), consider the following states:
1. Jharkhand
2. Odisha
3. Mizoram
4. Himachal Pradesh
5. Meghalaya
How many of the states listed above have Fifth Schedule Areas?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The text lists ten states with Fifth Schedule Areas: Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, and Rajasthan. From the given list, Jharkhand, Odisha, and Himachal Pradesh are included. Mizoram and Meghalaya are mentioned elsewhere as states where Part IX does not apply, but they are not listed as having Fifth Schedule Areas. Therefore, only three of the listed states have Fifth Schedule Areas.

Question 31

Consider the following statements regarding the challenges in the functioning of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs):

Statement I: The role of Sarpanches as elected representatives is often distorted due to their frequent interactions with Block Office staff for administrative approvals.

Statement II: The subordination of Gram Panchayats to Block Offices in some states necessitates these frequent interactions for funds and technical approvals.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement II provides the reason (subordination and need for approvals) for the situation described in Statement I (distorted role of Sarpanches due to frequent visits to Block Offices). The text explicitly links the subordination and the need to visit Block Offices for approvals, which in turn distorts the Sarpanch's role.

Question 32

Consider the following infrastructural and human resource challenges faced by Gram Panchayats:
1. Lack of full-time Secretaries in a large number of Panchayats.
2. Absence of basic office buildings for a quarter of the Gram Panchayats.
3. Universal availability of computing facilities in all Gram Panchayats.
4. Inadequate training for elected representatives regarding their roles and responsibilities.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The text mentions that a large number of Gram Panchayats lack a full-time Secretary (Statement 1), around 25% lack basic office buildings (Statement 2), and many elected representatives are not able to perform their functions properly for want of good training (Statement 4). However, it states that only around 20% of Gram Panchayats have computing facilities, making Statement 3 incorrect. Therefore, three statements are correct.

Question 33

With reference to the impact of Parallel Bodies (PBs) on Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), consider the following statements:
1. PBs are generally successful in avoiding common administrative evils like partisan politics and corruption.
2. PBs can usurp the legitimate space of PRIs due to their superior resource endowments.
3. The creation of PBs, such as missions, consistently helps in integrating and strengthening mainstream PRI programmes.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. Statement 1 is incorrect; the text states there is 'little evidence to show that such PBs have avoided the evils including that of partisan politics, sharing of spoils, corruption'. Statement 3 is incorrect; the text mentions that missions often create 'disconnect, duality, and alienation' from existing structures. Statement 2 is correct, as the text explicitly says PBs 'usurp the legitimate space of PRIs and demoralize the PRIs by virtue of their superior resource endowments'. The question asks for the incorrect statements.

Question 34

With reference to the legal and functional status of Gram Sabhas, consider the following statements:
1. Empowering Gram Sabhas is seen as a potent mechanism for enhancing transparency and accountability in local governance.
2. The majority of State Acts have clearly specified the powers and procedures for the functioning of Gram Sabhas.
3. State Acts have established uniform penalties for officials who fail to adhere to Gram Sabha procedures.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 only. Statement 1 is correct as the text suggests empowering Gram Sabhas could be a 'powerful weapon for transparency, accountability'. Statements 2 and 3 are incorrect. The text explicitly states that 'a number of the State Acts have not spelt the powers of Gram Sabhas nor have any procedures been laid down for the functioning of these bodies or penalties for the officials'.

Question 35

Regarding the challenges in the effective functioning of Panchayati Raj Institutions, consider the following points:
1. The creation of parallel bodies that bypass mainstream programmes.
2. The lack of computing facilities in a majority of Gram Panchayats.
3. The insufficient empowerment of Gram Sabhas in state-level legislation.
4. The subordination of Gram Panchayat Sarpanches to Block-level administration.
How many of the above are identified as challenges in the functioning of PRIs?

Accepted Answer

All four. All four points are explicitly mentioned as challenges. The text discusses the creation of Parallel Bodies (1), notes that only around 20% of Gram Panchayats have computing facilities (implying a lack in the majority) (2), states that many State Acts have not spelled out the powers of Gram Sabhas (3), and describes the subordination of Gram Panchayats to Block Offices (4).

Question 36

Considering the 73rd Constitutional Amendment's goal of establishing Panchayats as institutions of self-government, evaluate the following statements in light of recent developments regarding their financial autonomy:

1. Despite the constitutional mandate under Article 243-I for State Finance Commissions (SFCs), their delayed constitution and non-implementation of recommendations remain a primary reason for the poor fiscal health of Panchayats.
2. Recent RBI reports indicate that Panchayats' own tax revenue constitutes only about 1% of their total revenue, with over 95% coming from central and state government grants, highlighting extreme fiscal dependency.
3. The 'freebie culture' and the political reluctance of elected representatives to impose local taxes are identified as significant behavioral impediments to improving Own Source Revenue (OSR).
4. Digital initiatives like the Samarth Panchayat Portal are being piloted to streamline and enhance OSR management, representing a technological intervention to address fiscal constraints.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

All four. All four statements are correct. 1. The articles explicitly mention that SFCs are either delayed or their recommendations are ignored, hindering fiscal devolution. 2. The RBI report data is cited, stating Panchayats earn only 1% from taxes, with 80% from central and 15% from state grants (totaling 95%). 3. The 'freebie culture' and political unwillingness to levy taxes are mentioned as impediments to resource mobilization. 4. The Samarth Panchayat Portal is specifically named as an innovation to enhance OSR management.

Question 37

Considering the principles of representation and reservation in local governance, analyze the following statements comparing the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act and the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025.

1. The 73rd Amendment makes reservation for women in Panchayats a compulsory provision for states.
2. The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, mandates the inclusion of non-Muslim members and women in the reconstituted Waqf Boards.
3. While the 73rd Amendment mandates reservation for SCs and STs in Panchayats, providing reservation for backward classes is a voluntary provision left to the states.
4. Both the 73rd Amendment and the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, introduce constitutionally mandated representation for specific sub-sects within a community (e.g., Shia/Sunni in Waqf Boards).

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three. Statement 1 is correct; the 73rd Amendment mandates reservation of one-third of seats for women. Statement 2 is correct; the 2025 Act mandates two non-Muslim members and at least two women members in Waqf Boards. Statement 3 is correct; reservation for SCs/STs is compulsory, while for backward classes it is a voluntary provision for states. Statement 4 is incorrect; while the Waqf Act mandates representation for Shia, Sunni, etc., the 73rd Amendment does not mandate such sub-sect representation within the SC/ST or backward class categories for Panchayats. Therefore, only three statements are correct.

Question 38

In light of the recent Parliamentary Panel report on funding for Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs), consider the following statements regarding their financial framework:
1. The Constitution mandates the Governor to constitute a State Finance Commission (SFC) every five years to review the financial position of panchayats.
2. The Central Finance Commission is constitutionally barred from making recommendations concerning the resources of panchayats.
3. According to the 'Devolution to Panchayats in States Report 2024', PRIs generate the majority of their revenue through their own tax sources, such as property and business taxes.
4. The Parliamentary Panel noted that most states have consistently constituted SFCs and submitted Action Taken Reports (ATRs) on time.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Statement 1 is correct as per the static text. Statement 2 is incorrect; the static text explicitly states the Central Finance Commission shall suggest measures to augment the state's consolidated fund to supplement panchayat resources. Statement 3 is incorrect; the current affairs report highlights that PRIs generate only 1% of revenue through their own taxes, with 95% coming from government grants. Statement 4 is incorrect; the parliamentary panel noted that only 25 states have set up SFCs and many, like Telangana and Jharkhand, face delays in submitting ATRs. Therefore, only one statement is correct.

Question 39

Considering the celebration of National Panchayati Raj Day 2026, which marks 33 years of the 73rd Amendment Act, evaluate the following statements regarding the constitutional journey of Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs):

1. The 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill, introduced by the Rajiv Gandhi government, was primarily opposed on the grounds that it sought to undermine the federal structure by strengthening centralisation, a concern that the subsequent 73rd Act aimed to mitigate.
2. The 73rd Amendment Act transformed Article 40 of the Directive Principles of State Policy from a non-enforceable guideline into a justiciable mandate by bringing PRIs under the purview of the constitutional framework, obligating states to conduct regular elections.
3. The theme for NPRD 2026, “Sashakt Panchayat, Sarvangeen Vikas”, directly aligns with the objective of Article 243-G, which empowers state legislatures to endow Panchayats with powers and authority to function as institutions of self-government and prepare plans for economic development.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

All three. All three statements are correct. Statement 1 accurately reflects the opposition to the 64th Bill due to fears of centralisation, as mentioned in the provided text. Statement 2 is correct as the 73rd Act gave practical, constitutional, and justiciable shape to the DPSP in Article 40. Statement 3 correctly links the 2026 theme of empowerment and holistic development to the constitutional provision (Article 243-G) that enables the devolution of such powers to Panchayats.

Question 40

In the context of National Panchayati Raj Day 2026, which commemorates the enactment of the 73rd Constitutional Amendment Act, 1992, which of the following statements regarding the Act's provisions is/are NOT correct?

1. The Act added Part IX to the Constitution, making it mandatory for states with a population over 20 lakhs to establish a uniform three-tier Panchayati Raj system.
2. Article 243A establishes the Gram Sabha, comprising all persons on the electoral rolls of a village, as the only institution of direct democracy within the Indian constitutional framework.
3. The Act makes it compulsory for state governments to devolve all 29 functional items listed in the Eleventh Schedule to the Panchayati Raj Institutions to ensure their financial and administrative autonomy.

Accepted Answer

Only 3. Statement 3 is not correct. The 73rd Amendment Act includes both compulsory and voluntary provisions. While it adds the Eleventh Schedule with 29 items, the actual devolution of these functions and the extent of financial and administrative power given to Panchayats are left to the discretion of the state legislatures. This 'weak devolution' is a persistent challenge. Statements 1 and 2 are correct descriptions of the Act's provisions regarding the three-tier structure (with its demographic exception) and the role of the Gram Sabha.

Question 41

The historical context provided shows that the 64th Amendment Bill (1989) failed, while the 73rd Amendment Bill (1991) succeeded. As India celebrates 33 years of the latter on National Panchayati Raj Day 2026, what was the crucial difference in approach that led to the successful constitutionalisation of PRIs under the P.V. Narasimha Rao government?

Accepted Answer

The 73rd Bill was drastically modified to delete controversial aspects, likely addressing the opposition's concerns about excessive centralisation and infringement on states' rights.. The provided text explicitly states that the P.V. Narasimha Rao government 'drastically modified the proposals... to delete the controversial aspects' before introducing the bill in 1991. The primary controversy surrounding the earlier 64th Amendment Bill was the opposition's charge that it 'sought to strengthen centralisation in the federal system.' By addressing these concerns, the 1991 bill was able to build the necessary political consensus for its passage, unlike its predecessor.

Question 42

Considering the historical context celebrated on National Panchayati Raj Day 2026, which commemorates the 73rd Amendment Act, how many of the following statements regarding the legislative journey to constitutionalise Panchayati Raj are correct?

1. The 64th Amendment Bill, introduced by Rajiv Gandhi's government, failed to pass in the Rajya Sabha after being approved by the Lok Sabha.
2. The subsequent constitutional amendment bill introduced by the V.P. Singh government in 1990 was withdrawn due to opposition concerns about centralisation.
3. The 73rd Amendment Act gave practical shape to Article 40 of the DPSP, making the organisation of village panchayats a justiciable part of the Constitution.
4. The first National Panchayati Raj Day was celebrated in 1993, the year the 73rd Amendment Act came into force.

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct; the 64th Amendment Bill passed in the Lok Sabha but was not approved by the Rajya Sabha. Statement 3 is correct; the Act moved the concept of Panchayats from a non-enforceable Directive Principle (Article 40) to a justiciable part of the Constitution (Part IX). Statement 2 is incorrect; the V.P. Singh government's bill lapsed due to the fall of the government, not withdrawal due to opposition. Statement 4 is incorrect; the first National Panchayati Raj Day was celebrated in 2010, not 1993. Therefore, only two statements are correct.

Question 43

In the context of the National Panchayati Raj Day 2026 theme 'Sashakt Panchayat, Sarvangeen Vikas', match the constitutional provisions (List I) that form the bedrock of Panchayati Raj Institutions with their correct descriptions (List II).

List I (Provision)
1. Article 40
2. Article 243A
3. Article 243G
4. Part IX

List II (Description)
A. Defines the Gram Sabha, the foundation of direct democracy in the Panchayati Raj system.
B. Entitled 'The Panchayats', it consists of provisions from Articles 243 to 243 O.
C. A Directive Principle of State Policy that directs the state to organise village panchayats.
D. Deals with the powers, authority, and responsibilities of Panchayats, linked to the 29 items in the Eleventh Schedule.

Accepted Answer

1-C, 2-A, 3-D, 4-B. The correct matching is as follows: Article 40 is a Directive Principle for organizing village panchayats (1-C). Article 243A specifically deals with the Gram Sabha (2-A). Article 243G outlines the powers and responsibilities to be devolved to Panchayats, corresponding to the Eleventh Schedule (3-D). Part IX is the new part added to the Constitution, titled 'The Panchayats' (4-B).

Question 44

The 64th Constitutional Amendment Bill was opposed on grounds that it sought to strengthen centralisation. With reference to the successful 73rd Amendment Act, 1992, celebrated on National Panchayati Raj Day, which of the following statements regarding its constitutional implications is NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

The Act completely transferred authority over all 29 functional items in the Eleventh Schedule to the Panchayats, removing all discretion from state legislatures regarding the devolution of powers.. Statement (c) is incorrect. The 73rd Amendment Act provides a framework for the devolution of powers and lists 29 functional items in the Eleventh Schedule. However, the actual extent of devolution of powers, functions, and funds to the Panchayats is left to the discretion of the state legislatures. This has been a persistent challenge, leading to issues like fiscal dependency and weak devolution, as noted in the current affairs update. The other statements accurately describe the constitutional implications of the Act.

Panchayati Raj

Unlock All Questions