Question Bank›Indian Polity›Official Language
Indian Polity

Official Language

UPSC Indian Polity MCQs on Official Language — topic-wise, with answer explanations.

Lesson
01Historical Background02Making of the Constitution03Salient Features of the Constitution04Preamble of the Constitution05Union and its Territory06Citizenship07Fundamental Rights08Directive Principles of State Policy & Fundamental Duties09Amendment of the Constitution & Basic Structure10Parliamentary System11Federal System12Centre–State Relations13Inter-State Relations14Emergency Provisions15President & Vice-President16Prime Minister17Central Council of Ministers & Cabinet Committees18Parliament19Parliamentary Committees20Parliamentary Forums & Parliamentary Group21Supreme Court22Judicial Review23Judicial Activism24Public Interest Litigation25Governor26Chief Minister27State Council of Ministers28State Legislature29High Court30Tribunals31Subordinate Courts32Special Provisions for Some States33Panchayati Raj34Municipalities35Union Territories36Scheduled and Tribal Areas37Election Commission, Elections & Election Laws38Union & State Public Service Commissions39Finance Commission & GST Council40National Commissions for SCs, STs, BCs & Linguistic Minorities41Comptroller and Auditor General of India42Attorney General of India & Advocate General of the State43NITI Aayog44National & State Human Rights Commissions45Central & State Information Commissions46Central Vigilance Commission47Central Bureau of Investigation48Lokpal, Lokayuktas & National Investigation Agency49National Disaster Management Authority50Co-operative Societies51Official Language52Public Services53Rights and Liabilities of the Government54Special Provisions Relating to Certain Classes55Political Parties & Role of Regional Parties56Electoral Reforms57Voting Behaviour & Coalition Government58Anti-Defection Law & Pressure Groups59National Integration60Foreign Policy
Indian PolityLesson 51

Showing 3 of 38 questions

Textbookmedium

Q1.Consider the following statements regarding the official language provisions in the Indian Constitution: 1. The provisions concerning the official language are detailed in Part XVII of the Constitution. 2. These provisions are encompassed within Articles 343 to 351. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Part XVII of the Constitution, spanning Articles 343 to 351, comprehensively deals with the subject of official language in India. Therefore, both statements are correct.
Textbookmedium

Q2.With reference to Part XVII of the Constitution, the provisions for official language are divided into which of the following heads? 1. Language of the Union 2. Regional languages 3. Language of the judiciary and texts of laws 4. Special directives How many of the above are correct?

Explanation: The constitutional provisions for official language under Part XVII are explicitly divided into four distinct heads: Language of the Union, Regional languages, Language of the judiciary and texts of laws, and Special directives.
Textbookmedium

Q3.Consider the following statements: 1. Part XVI of the Constitution of India deals with the official language. 2. The provisions related to official language are divided into four main categories or heads. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect because Part XVII, not Part XVI, of the Constitution deals with the official language. Statement 2 is correct as these provisions are indeed divided into four heads.
Textbookhard

Q4.Part XVII of the Constitution divides the provisions for official language into four heads. Consider the following: 1. Language of the Union 2. Language of the States 3. Language of the Judiciary 4. Language for inter-state communication How many of the above are explicitly mentioned as the primary heads of these provisions in the Constitution?

Explanation: The four heads mentioned in the Constitution are: Language of the Union, Regional languages, Language of the judiciary and texts of laws, and Special directives. From the given list, 'Language of the Union' and 'Language of the Judiciary' (as part of 'Language of the judiciary and texts of laws') are correct. 'Language of the States' is referred to as 'Regional languages', and 'Language for inter-state communication' is a sub-topic, not a main head. Therefore, only two of the listed items correspond directly to the primary heads.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q5.Statement I: The provisions in Part XVII of the Constitution are categorised under four heads: Language of the Union, Regional languages, Language of the judiciary and texts of laws, and Special directives. Statement II: The constitutional framework for official language is located in Articles 343 to 351.

Explanation: Both statements are factually correct. Statement I correctly lists the four-fold division of the official language provisions. Statement II correctly identifies the relevant articles. However, Statement II merely states the location of the provisions in the Constitution and does not explain the reason for the specific four-fold categorization mentioned in Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q6.Consider the following statements regarding the official language of the Union as per the Constitution: 1. The Constitution mandates the use of the Devanagari form of numerals for the official purposes of the Union. 2. The Constitution provided for the use of the English language for all official purposes of the Union for a period of fifteen years from its commencement. 3. The Official Languages Act, 1963, was amended in 1967 to make the use of English, in addition to Hindi, compulsory in certain cases. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the Constitution specifies the international form of Indian numerals, not the Devanagari form. Statement 2 is correct as English was to be used for 15 years (1950-1965). Statement 3 is also correct as the 1967 amendment made the use of English compulsory in certain cases, alongside Hindi.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q7.With reference to the Official Languages Act (1963), consider the following provisions: 1. It provides for the continued use of English, in addition to Hindi, for all official purposes of the Union without any time-limit. 2. It lays down that English should be used for communication between the Union and the non-Hindi states. 3. It stipulates that where Hindi is used for communication between a Hindi and a non-Hindi state, such communication must be accompanied by an English translation. 4. It made the use of English compulsory for the transaction of business in Parliament. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct provisions derived from the Official Languages Act (1963) and its context. Statement 4 is incorrect; the Act provides for the use of English in addition to Hindi for parliamentary business, but does not make it compulsory over Hindi. The 1967 amendment made English compulsory in 'certain cases', but the original act provided for its continued use alongside Hindi.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q8.Statement I: The legislature of a state can adopt a language as its official language even if that language is not enumerated in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. Statement II: The Constitution provides that for the time being, English would remain the link language for communications between the Union and the states, but two or more states are free to agree to use Hindi for communication between themselves.

Explanation: Both statements are factually correct based on constitutional provisions for regional languages. Statement I correctly notes that states' choices for official languages are not restricted to the Eighth Schedule (e.g., Nagaland adopted English). Statement II correctly describes the rules for inter-governmental communication. However, Statement II, which deals with communication between governments, does not explain the power of a state legislature to choose its own internal official language, as described in Statement I. They are two separate, though related, provisions.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q9.Consider the following events related to the official language policy of India: 1. Appointment of the Official Language Commission under B.G. Kher. 2. Enactment of the Official Languages Act. 3. Constitution of a committee of Parliament under Gobind Ballabh Pant. 4. Amendment of the Official Languages Act to make the use of English compulsory in certain cases. What is the correct chronological sequence of the events given above?

Explanation: The correct chronological order is: 1. The Official Language Commission under B.G. Kher was appointed in 1955. 2. The parliamentary committee under Gobind Ballabh Pant was constituted in 1957 to examine the commission's report. 3. The Official Languages Act was enacted in 1963. 4. The Act was amended in 1967.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q10.Consider the following pairs regarding official language provisions: 1. State Legislature : Can adopt Hindi or any language in use in the state as official language. 2. President of India : Can direct a state to officially recognise a language spoken by a substantial proportion of its population. 3. Parliament of India : Appoints the Official Language Commission every five years. 4. Official Language Commission : Reports its recommendations to a special committee of Parliament. How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Explanation: Pair 1 is correct. Pair 2 is correct. Pair 3 is incorrect; the President, not Parliament, is empowered to appoint the commission. Pair 4 is incorrect; the commission submits its report to the President, who then lays it before Parliament and sends it to the parliamentary committee. Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q11.Consider the following pairs: Article : Subject-matter 1. Article 348 : Language to be used in the Supreme Court and High Courts 2. Article 350A : Facilities for instruction in mother-tongue at primary stage 3. Article 345 : Official language of the Union 4. Article 351 : Special Officer for linguistic minorities How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Explanation: Pair 1 is correct as Article 348 deals with the language of the judiciary. Pair 2 is correct as Article 350A provides for facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage. Pair 3 is incorrect; Article 345 deals with the official language of a state, while Article 343 deals with the official language of the Union. Pair 4 is incorrect; Article 351 contains a directive for the development of the Hindi language, while Article 350B provides for a Special Officer for linguistic minorities.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q12.Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional provisions on official language: 1. Article 344 of the Constitution deals with the establishment of a Commission and Committee of Parliament on official language. 2. Article 350B provides for a Special Officer for linguistic minorities. 3. Article 347 outlines the official language or languages of a state. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct. Article 344 provides for a Commission and a Committee of Parliament on official language. Statement 2 is correct. Article 350B provides for the appointment of a Special Officer for linguistic minorities. Statement 3 is incorrect. Article 345 deals with the official language or languages of a state. Article 347 contains a special provision relating to the language spoken by a section of the population of a state, allowing the President to direct its official recognition.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q13.How many of the subjects listed below are explicitly mentioned in the Constitution of India under Articles 349 to 351 (inclusive)? 1. Special procedure for enactment of certain laws relating to language 2. Facilities for instruction in mother-tongue at primary stage 3. Directive for development of the Hindi language 4. Language to be used in representation for redress of grievances

Explanation: All four subjects are covered within the specified range of articles. Article 349 covers the special procedure for language laws. Article 350 covers language for redress of grievances. Article 350A covers instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage. Article 351 contains the directive for the development of Hindi.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q14.Statement I: Article 348 of the Constitution of India specifies the language to be used in the Supreme Court and the High Courts. Statement II: Article 351 of the Constitution of India provides a directive for the Union to promote the spread and development of the Hindi language.

Explanation: Both statements are factually correct as per the constitutional provisions. Statement I refers to Article 348, which governs the language of the higher judiciary. Statement II refers to Article 351, which is a directive for promoting Hindi. The two articles deal with separate and independent aspects of the language policy and have no direct explanatory relationship.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q15.With reference to the constitutional provisions on official language, consider the following statements: 1. The Constitution specifies the official language for communication between one state and another. 2. There is a constitutional provision for a person to submit a representation for the redress of any grievance in any of the languages used in the Union or in the state. 3. The subject matter of the official language of the Union is covered under Article 345. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; Article 346 deals with the official language for communication between states or between a state and the Union. Statement 2 is correct; Article 350 provides for the language to be used in representations for the redress of grievances. Statement 3 is incorrect; Article 343 deals with the official language of the Union, whereas Article 345 deals with the official language or languages of a state.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q16.With reference to the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities, consider the following statements: 1. The officer is appointed by the President of India. 2. The primary function of the officer is to investigate matters related to constitutional safeguards for linguistic minorities. 3. The officer submits reports directly to the Parliament. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: The Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities is appointed by the President and is tasked with investigating matters concerning constitutional safeguards for linguistic minorities. The officer submits reports to the President, not directly to Parliament. The President then places these reports before Parliament.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q17.Consider the following statements: Statement I: The President of India can issue directions to any state to ensure the provision of adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage of education for children from linguistic minority groups. Statement II: The Constitution mandates that every state and local authority must provide such facilities, and the President's power to issue directions is to ensure compliance with this constitutional provision. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Explanation: The Constitution requires states and local authorities to provide primary education in the mother tongue for linguistic minorities. To enforce this constitutional duty of the states, the President is empowered to issue necessary directions. Therefore, Statement II correctly explains the basis for the power mentioned in Statement I.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q18.Consider the following actions related to the protection of linguistic minorities: 1. Appointing a special officer for linguistic minorities. 2. Providing adequate facilities for instruction in the mother-tongue at the primary stage. 3. Placing the reports of the special officer before the Parliament. 4. Sending the reports of the special officer to the concerned state government. How many of the above actions are functions assigned by the Constitution to the President of India?

Explanation: The Constitution assigns the President the functions of: (1) appointing the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities, (3) placing the officer's reports before Parliament, and (4) sending these reports to the concerned state governments. Providing educational facilities (2) is the duty of the state and local authorities, not the President.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q19.With reference to the constitutional safeguards for language protection, consider the following statements: 1. A representation submitted by an aggrieved person can be rejected if it is not in the official language of the Union or the concerned state. 2. The President is constitutionally obligated to appoint a Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities. 3. The report of the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities is sent to the concerned state government by the President. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: The Constitution provides that a representation for the redress of any grievance cannot be rejected on the ground that it is not in the official language. Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect. The Constitution states the President 'should appoint' a Special Officer, which implies a constitutional obligation. The President also sends the officer's reports to the concerned state governments. Thus, statements 2 and 3 are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q20.Consider the following pairs: 1. Provision of facilities for mother-tongue instruction at primary stage : State Government and Local Authority 2. Appointment of Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities : Parliament of India 3. Submission of representation in any language of the Union/State : Aggrieved Person 4. Placing the Special Officer's report before Parliament : President of India How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Explanation: Pair 1 is correct as states and local authorities are responsible for providing primary education facilities in the mother tongue. Pair 3 is correct as it is the right of an aggrieved person. Pair 4 is correct as the President places the report before Parliament. Pair 2 is incorrect; the Special Officer is appointed by the President, not the Parliament. Thus, three pairs are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q21.Consider the following statements regarding the Committee of Parliament on Official Language: 1. The Committee consists of 30 members, with an equal number of members from the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. 2. The Chairman of the Committee is appointed by the President of India from amongst its members. 3. By convention, the Union Home Minister has been elected as the Chairman of the Committee. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the Committee has 30 members, but 20 are from the Lok Sabha and 10 are from the Rajya Sabha. Statement 2 is incorrect; the Chairman is elected by the members of the Committee, not appointed by the President. Statement 3 is correct as the text mentions it is a convention for the Union Home Minister to be elected as the Chairman.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q22.With reference to the promotion and development of Hindi, consider the following statements: 1. The Official Languages Act was passed in 1963. 2. The Committee of Parliament on Official Language was first set up in 1965. 3. The members of the committee are elected through a system of proportional representation. 4. The committee is composed of 20 members from Lok Sabha and 10 from Rajya Sabha. How many of the above statements are correct?

Explanation: Statement 2 is incorrect; the Committee was set up in 1976. The Official Languages Act (1963) provided for its constitution after ten years from 26 January 1965. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are all factually correct based on the provisions of the Act and the composition of the committee.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q23.Consider the following statements: Statement I: The Committee of Parliament on Official Language submits its report with recommendations directly to both Houses of Parliament. Statement II: The President of India is bound to issue directions in accordance with the whole of the report submitted by the Committee. Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Explanation: Statement I is incorrect because the Committee submits its report to the President, who then causes it to be laid before each House of Parliament. Statement II is incorrect because the President, after considering the report and the views of State Governments, may issue directions in accordance with the whole or any part of the report, implying discretion.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q24.Consider the following statements about the Committee of Parliament on Official Language: 1. The primary duty of the Committee is to review the progress made in the use of Hindi for the official purposes of the Union. 2. The Committee's scope of examination is strictly limited to the use of Hindi in Central Government offices. 3. The Secretariat of the Committee functions as a subordinate office of the Department of Official Language, Ministry of Home Affairs. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: Statement 2 is not correct. While the Committee reviews the use of Hindi in government offices, its terms of reference are comprehensive, allowing it to examine other relevant aspects like the medium of instruction in educational institutions and the mode of recruitment to Central Government services. Statements 1 and 3 are correct descriptions of the Committee's primary duty and administrative structure, respectively.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q25.With reference to the Committee on Official Language, consider the following aspects: 1. The resolution for its constitution requires the previous sanction of the President. 2. It has the mandate to invite eminent persons from various fields for oral evidence. 3. It is required to present its report to the President in a single, comprehensive document. 4. Its three sub-committees were set up to divide the Ministries/Departments for inspection purposes. How many of the above statements are correct?

Explanation: Statement 3 is incorrect. The Committee decided to present its report to the President in parts, with each part relating to a specific aspect of the Official Language policy. Statements 1, 2, and 4 are correct. The resolution for the committee's constitution needs the President's prior sanction, it can invite eminent persons for oral evidence, and it set up three sub-committees for inspection.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q26.Consider the following criteria for declaring a language as classical in India: 1. High antiquity of its early texts over a period of 1,500–2,000 years. 2. A literary tradition that is primarily borrowed from another major speech community. 3. A mandatory and unbroken continuity between the classical language and its modern form. 4. A body of ancient literature considered a valuable heritage by its speakers. How many of the criteria listed above are correct?

Explanation: The criteria for classical language status require high antiquity (1,500-2,000 years) and a body of ancient literature considered a valuable heritage. However, the literary tradition must be original, not borrowed. Furthermore, a discontinuity between the classical language and its modern forms is permissible, not forbidden. Therefore, only statements 1 and 4 are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q27.With reference to the criteria for declaring a language as classical in India, which of the following statements is NOT correct?

Explanation: The official criteria state that there can be a discontinuity between the classical language and its later forms or its offshoots. The requirement is not for clear and direct continuity; in fact, the classical form being distinct from the modern one is an accepted characteristic.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q28.Consider the following statements: Statement I: For a language to be granted classical status, its literary tradition must be original and not borrowed from another speech community. Statement II: A significant discontinuity between the classical language and its later forms or offshoots is a permissible characteristic for a language to be declared classical.

Explanation: Both statements are correct and represent distinct criteria for declaring a language as classical. Statement I refers to the originality of the literary tradition. Statement II refers to the relationship between the classical and modern forms of the language. They are two separate, independent conditions and one does not explain the other.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q29.Consider the following characteristics with respect to a language being declared 'classical': 1. Antiquity of early texts spanning 1,500-2,000 years. 2. A body of literature valued as heritage. 3. An original, non-borrowed literary tradition. 4. Potential discontinuity from its modern form. How many of the above are part of the official criteria for declaring a language as classical in India?

Explanation: All four characteristics listed are part of the official criteria for a language to be declared classical. These include high antiquity, a valuable literary heritage, an original tradition, and the possibility of being distinct from its modern form (discontinuity).
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q30.With reference to Classical Language Status in India, consider the following statements: 1. One of the key criteria is that its literary tradition must be borrowed from another well-established speech community to demonstrate its interconnectedness. 2. The classical language and its literature can be distinct from its modern form, and a discontinuity between them is an acceptable condition. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is incorrect; the criterion explicitly requires the literary tradition to be original and not borrowed. Statement 2 is correct, as the guidelines allow for a discontinuity between the classical language and its later forms or offshoots.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q31.Consider the following pairs: Language : Year of Declaration 1. Tamil : 2004 2. Sanskrit : 2005 3. Malayalam : 2014 4. Odia : 2013 How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Explanation: Based on the official declarations, Tamil was declared in 2004 and Sanskrit in 2005, making pairs 1 and 2 correct. Malayalam was declared in 2013 (not 2014) and Odia in 2014 (not 2013), making pairs 3 and 4 incorrect. Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q32.Consider the following statements regarding the declaration of classical languages: 1. Telugu and Kannada were declared as classical languages in the same year. 2. Sanskrit was the first language to be accorded the status of a classical language. 3. Odia is the most recent language to have been declared a classical language. Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as both Telugu and Kannada were declared in 2008. Statement 3 is correct as Odia was declared in 2014, the latest on the list. Statement 2 is incorrect because Tamil was the first language to be declared classical in 2004, while Sanskrit was declared in 2005. The question asks for the incorrect statement.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q33.Consider the following languages: 1. Tamil 2. Sanskrit 3. Telugu 4. Malayalam 5. Odia How many of the languages listed above were declared as classical languages before the year 2010?

Explanation: The years of declaration for the languages are: Tamil (2004), Sanskrit (2005), Telugu (2008), Malayalam (2013), and Odia (2014). The languages declared before 2010 are Tamil, Sanskrit, and Telugu. Therefore, three of the listed languages were declared before 2010.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookhard

Q34.Statement I: The declaration of Malayalam as a classical language occurred after the declaration of Telugu and Kannada. Statement II: There was a gap of exactly five years between the declaration of Sanskrit and Telugu as classical languages.

Explanation: Statement I is correct. Malayalam was declared in 2013, which is after 2008 when both Telugu and Kannada were declared. Statement II is incorrect. Sanskrit was declared in 2005 and Telugu in 2008. The gap between them is three years, not five.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Textbookmedium

Q35.With reference to the declaration of classical languages, consider the following statements: 1. Two languages were declared as classical languages in the year 2008. 2. The declaration of Tamil as a classical language happened in 2005. 3. Malayalam was declared a classical language one year before Odia. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct as both Telugu and Kannada were declared in 2008. Statement 2 is incorrect; Tamil was declared in 2004, not 2005. Statement 3 is correct as Malayalam was declared in 2013 and Odia in 2014, which is a one-year difference.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard

Q36.Consider the following statements regarding the institutional framework for minority protection in India, in light of recent discussions on the National Commission for Minorities (NCM): 1. The Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities is a constitutional post, whereas the National Commission for Minorities is a statutory body. 2. The jurisdiction of the National Commission for Minorities was expanded in 1988 to include linguistic minorities alongside religious minorities. 3. The President is constitutionally mandated to appoint a Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities to investigate all matters relating to their constitutional safeguards. 4. Both the Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities and the NCM have the power to enforce their recommendations on state governments. How many of the above statements are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; Article 350-B of the Constitution provides for a Special Officer for Linguistic Minorities, making it a constitutional post. The NCM was established under the NCM Act, 1992, making it a statutory body. Statement 2 is incorrect; the current affairs article explicitly states that in 1988, linguistic minorities were excluded from the Commission’s jurisdiction. Statement 3 is correct; Article 350-B mandates the President to appoint this special officer. Statement 4 is incorrect; the NCM's powers are largely advisory, and it lacks enforcement capacity. The Special Officer reports to the President, who then places the report before Parliament and sends it to the states; the officer does not have direct enforcement powers. Therefore, only two statements (1 and 3) are correct.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairsmedium

Q37.Consider the following pairs regarding languages and their status in India: 1. Kannada : Declared a Classical Language in 2008 2. Odia : The most recent language to be declared a Classical Language 3. Marathi : Consideration for Classical Language status is currently delayed 4. Bengali : Recently granted Classical Language status in 2024 How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; Kannada was declared a classical language in 2008. Statement 2 is correct; Odia was the last language to be granted this status in 2014. Statement 3 is correct; the recent decision to modify the criteria has delayed the consideration of Marathi's application. Statement 4 is incorrect; while there is a strong demand from Bengali speakers, it has not been granted classical language status.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation
Current Affairshard

Q38.Considering the recent initiative by the Indira Gandhi National Centre for Arts (IGNCA) to create a 'Language Atlas' for preserving linguistic diversity, analyze the following statements regarding Classical Languages in India: 1. All languages currently recognized with 'Classical Language' status are also part of the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution. 2. The process and criteria for declaring a language as 'Classical' are explicitly detailed in Part XVII of the Indian Constitution. 3. The IGNCA's proposed linguistic survey will be the first comprehensive effort to document India's languages since Sir George Abraham Grierson's LSI published in 1928. 4. Both Telugu and Kannada were accorded the status of 'Classical Language' simultaneously in the same calendar year. How many of the above statements are correct?

Explanation: Statement 1 is correct; the current affairs text confirms all 6 classical languages are in the 8th Schedule. Statement 4 is correct based on the static data, which shows both were declared in 2008. Statement 2 is incorrect; the criteria are administrative, set by the Ministry of Culture, not constitutionally defined in Part XVII. Statement 3 is incorrect; the 1961 Census was also a very detailed linguistic survey, even more exhaustive in some respects than later ones.
🔒 Verify your phone to reveal the answer & explanation

35 answers locked

You've used your 3 free answers in Indian Polity. Verify your phone to unlock 20 more — free.

Unlock All Questions

All questions with explanations, AI notes and a personalised revision calendar — in the free app.

↓ Get on AndroidiOS coming soon