Question 1

Consider the following pairs:
Thinker : Key Concept on National Integration
1. Myron Weiner : Avoidance of divisive movements
2. H.A. Gani : Cohesion not fusion
3. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan : A thought in the heads of the people
4. Rasheeduddin Khan : A socio-psychological process
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is correct as Myron Weiner's definition includes 'avoidance of divisive movements'. Pair 3 is correct as Dr. S. Radhakrishnan described integration as 'a thought which must go into the heads of the people'. Pair 2 is incorrect; 'cohesion not fusion' is from Rasheeduddin Khan's definition. Pair 4 is incorrect; 'a socio-psychological and educational process' is from H.A. Gani's definition.

Question 2

With reference to the concept of national integration, consider the following statements:
1. The concept, as defined by various thinkers, implies that achieving national integration requires the complete assimilation and merger of discrete segments of the population.
2. The scope of national integration is primarily confined to the political and social dimensions of a nation.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

Neither 1 nor 2. Statement 1 is incorrect. Rasheeduddin Khan's definition explicitly states 'cohesion not fusion' and 'agglomeration not assimilation', contradicting the idea of complete merger. Statement 2 is incorrect. The text concludes that national integration involves political, economic, social, cultural, and psychological dimensions, not just political and social ones.

Question 3

Consider the following statements regarding the definitions of national integration:
1. Myron Weiner's definition emphasizes prioritizing national interests over parochial ones.
2. H.A. Gani's perspective highlights the development of a feeling of unity and common citizenship.
3. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan suggests that national integration is like an industrial plan that can be implemented by experts.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statement 3 is incorrect. Dr. S. Radhakrishnan explicitly states that national integration is 'not an industrial plan too which could be discussed and implemented by experts'. Statements 1 and 2 are correct interpretations of the definitions provided by Myron Weiner and H.A. Gani, respectively. The question asks for the incorrect statement.

Question 4

Statement I: The overarching concept of national integration in a diverse country like India promotes cohesion while respecting the distinct identities of its various communities.
Statement II: Rasheeduddin Khan's definition of national integration as 'unity but not uniformity' and 'cohesion not fusion' supports the idea that integration does not mean the erasure of diversity.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement I correctly summarizes the essence of national integration in a diverse context. Statement II correctly quotes Rasheeduddin Khan's view. Statement II provides a specific philosophical underpinning that directly explains and validates the principle mentioned in Statement I, showing how cohesion can be achieved without demanding uniformity, thus respecting distinct identities.

Question 5

According to the provided text, the concept of national integration involves
which of the following dimensions?
1. Political
2. Economic
3. Social
4. Cultural
5. Psychological
How many of the above dimensions are mentioned?

Accepted Answer

All five. The text explicitly summarizes that 'the concept of national integration involves political, economic, social, cultural and psychological dimensions and the inter-relations between them'. Therefore, all five listed dimensions are mentioned.

Question 6

Consider the following phenomena in the context of Indian polity:
1. Demand for separate statehood like Telengana.
2. Inter-state river water disputes like the Cauvery dispute.
3. The 'Sons of the soil' theory advocating preference for local people.
4. Demand for full-fledged statehood for a Union Territory like Delhi.
How many of the above are mentioned as manifestations of Regionalism in the provided text?

Accepted Answer

All four. Regionalism, as an obstacle to national integration, manifests in various forms. These include the demand for separate statehood, inter-state disputes over resources like river water, the 'sons of the soil' theory promoting local preference, and the demand for upgrading Union Territories to full-fledged states. All four phenomena listed are cited as forms of regionalism.

Question 7

Statement I: Communalism in India, as a political phenomenon, has its origins in the policies enacted during the British rule.
Statement II: The Government of India Acts of 1909, 1919, and 1935 introduced the principle of communal representation for Muslims, Sikhs, and others, which accentuated religious divisions.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Statement I is correct as the roots of modern communalism are often traced back to British policies. Statement II is also correct as the Acts of 1909 (Morley-Minto Reforms), 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms), and 1935 formally introduced and expanded communal electorates. Statement II provides the specific historical policy (communal representation) that substantiates the assertion made in Statement I, making it the correct explanation.

Question 8

Consider the following statements regarding obstacles to national integration:
1. The formation of political parties like the Bahujan Samaj Party is considered a manifestation of casteism.
2. The 'Sons of the soil' theory is a primary manifestation of communalism.
3. Allotment of party tickets during elections based on caste lines is a form of casteism.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 1 is correct; the formation of parties on a caste basis is a manifestation of casteism. Statement 3 is also correct; politicization of caste includes distributing election tickets on caste lines. Statement 2 is incorrect; the 'Sons of the soil' theory, which advocates for local preferences, is a manifestation of regionalism, not communalism. The question asks for the incorrect statement.

Question 9

With reference to Linguism and the Official Language Act (1963), consider the following statements:
1. The Official Language Act of 1963 led to anti-Hindi agitations in several non-Hindi speaking states.
2. The Act provided for the continuation of English as an associate official language for an indefinite period, contingent on the desire of non-Hindi speaking states.
3. The three-language formula, proposed as a solution, has been successfully and uniformly implemented in all states, including Tamil Nadu.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statement 1 is correct, as the enactment of the Act making Hindi the official language sparked protests in South India and West Bengal. Statement 2 is also correct; to assuage fears, the government assured that English would continue as an associate official language as long as non-Hindi states desired it. Statement 3 is incorrect; the text explicitly mentions that the three-language formula is still not being implemented in Tamil Nadu, indicating a lack of uniform implementation.

Question 10

Consider the following pairs:
Obstacle to National Integration : Example
1. Regionalism : Demand for Gorkhaland
2. Communalism : Vishwa Hindu Parishad
3. Casteism : Nadar Association
4. Linguism : Anti-Hindi agitation in West Bengal
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

All four pairs. All four pairs are correctly matched based on the provided text's classifications. 1. The demand for Gorkhaland is an example of regionalism seeking separate statehood. 2. The Vishwa Hindu Parishad is cited as a pressure group based on religion, a manifestation of communalism. 3. The Nadar Association is given as an example of a pressure group based on caste, a form of casteism. 4. Anti-Hindi agitation in West Bengal is mentioned as a consequence of language policy, which is a manifestation of linguism.

Question 11

Consider the following issues that have posed a threat to national integration in India:
1. Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid problem
2. Terrorism in Punjab
3. Approach to the Communal Violence Bill
4. Unrest in the north-eastern region
How many of the issues listed above were explicitly on the agenda for discussion in various meetings of the National Integration Council (NIC) as mentioned in the provided text?

Accepted Answer

All four. The provided text mentions all four issues being on the agenda of different NIC meetings. The Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid problem was discussed in 1990. Terrorism in Punjab was addressed in 1986. The Communal Violence Bill was on the agenda in 2011. Unrest in the north-eastern region was a topic for discussion in 1980.

Question 12

Consider the following statements regarding the composition and structure of the National Integration Council (NIC) and its related bodies:
1. The Prime Minister of India has consistently served as the chairman of the NIC since its inception.
2. The initial council constituted in 1961 included representatives from industry, business, and trade unions.
3. The Standing Committee of the NIC, constituted in 2010, is chaired by the Union Home Minister.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 2 is incorrect. Representatives of industry, business, and trade unions were included in the NIC only during its revival in 1968, not in the initial council of 1961. Statement 1 is correct as the Prime Minister is mentioned as the chairman in every reconstitution. Statement 3 is also correct as the text explicitly states the Standing Committee (2010) was chaired by the Union Home Minister.

Question 13

Consider the following pairs:
1. First constitution of NIC : 1961
2. Reconstitution by V.P. Singh's government : 1990
3. Reconstitution by UPA government after a 12-year gap : 2005
4. First revival of the NIC after its initial constitution : 1968
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

All four pairs. All four pairs are correctly matched based on the historical timeline provided in the text. The NIC was first constituted in 1961. It was first revived in 1968. The National Front Government headed by V.P. Singh reconstituted it in 1990. The UPA government reconstituted it in 2005 after its last meeting in 1992, which is a gap of over 12 years.

Question 14

With reference to the National Foundation for Communal Harmony (NFCH), consider the following statements:
1. It is an autonomous body operating under the administrative control of the Union Home Ministry.
2. Its primary mission is to promote communal harmony, fraternity, and national integration.
3. The NFCH was established in the same year the National Integration Council was first constituted.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statements 1 and 2 are correct. The text explicitly states that the NFCH is an autonomous body under the Union Home Ministry and that it promotes communal harmony and national integration. Statement 3 is incorrect; the NFCH was set up in 1992, whereas the National Integration Council was first constituted in 1961.

Question 15

Given below are two statements:
Statement I: The membership of the National Integration Council (NIC) was progressively expanded in successive reconstitutions to include a wider range of representatives, such as those from industry, media, and women's organisations.
Statement II: The fundamental mandate of the National Integration Council was to serve as a high-level forum to examine the problem of national integration in all its aspects and make necessary recommendations.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Both statements are correct. Statement I accurately reflects the trend of expanding the NIC's membership over time, as detailed in the text. Statement II correctly identifies the core purpose of the NIC. Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I because to effectively 'examine the problem of national integration in all its aspects', it was necessary to include a diverse and broad-based membership representing various sectors of society.

Question 16

Consider the following pairs:
1. First Meeting : 1962
2. Fifth Meeting : 1986
3. Tenth Meeting : 1991
4. Fifteenth Meeting : 2013
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only three pairs. The First Meeting was in 1962, the Fifth in 1986, and the Tenth in 1991, making these three pairs correct. The Fifteenth Meeting was held in 2011, not 2013, making the fourth pair incorrect. Therefore, only three pairs are correctly matched.

Question 17

Consider the following statements regarding the meetings:
1. The Third Meeting was held in November 1980.
2. The Eighth Meeting took place in September 1990.
3. The Twelfth Meeting was held in the year 1991.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statement 1 is correct as the Third Meeting was on 12th November, 1980. Statement 2 is correct as the Eighth Meeting was on 22nd September, 1990. Statement 3 is incorrect because the Twelfth Meeting was held on 23rd November, 1992, not in 1991.

Question 18

Based on the provided timeline of meetings, consider the following statements:
1. More meetings were held in the 1990s than in the 1980s.
2. A gap of more than fifteen years occurred between the Twelfth and Thirteenth meetings.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 only. Statement 1 is correct. Six meetings (7th to 12th) were held in the 1990s (1990, 1990, 1991, 1991, 1992, 1992), while four meetings (3rd to 6th) were held in the 1980s (1980, 1984, 1986, 1986). Statement 2 is incorrect. The Twelfth Meeting was in November 1992 and the Thirteenth was in August 2005, a gap of approximately 12 years and 9 months, which is less than fifteen years.

Question 19

Consider the following statements:
1. The first six meetings occurred over a span of exactly 24 years.
2. Exactly two meetings were held in the year 1986.
3. Exactly two meetings were held in the year 1991.
4. The time gap between the Thirteenth and Fourteenth meetings was longer than the gap between the Fourteenth and Fifteenth meetings.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three statements. Statement 1 is correct (Sixth Meeting in 1986 - First Meeting in 1962 = 24 years). Statement 2 is correct (Fifth Meeting in April 1986, Sixth in September 1986). Statement 3 is correct (Ninth Meeting in November 1991, Tenth in December 1991). Statement 4 is incorrect; the gap between the 13th (Aug 2005) and 14th (Oct 2008) meetings is about 3 years and 2 months, while the gap between the 14th (Oct 2008) and 15th (Sep 2011) meetings is about 2 years and 11 months. Thus, the first gap was longer. Therefore, three statements are correct.

Question 20

Consider the following meetings:
1. Eleventh Meeting
2. Thirteenth Meeting
3. Fourteenth Meeting
4. Sixteenth Meeting
How many of the meetings listed above were held in the 21st century (i.e., from the year 2001 onwards)?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The Eleventh Meeting was in 1992 (20th century). The Thirteenth Meeting was in 2005, the Fourteenth in 2008, and the Sixteenth in 2013. These three meetings were held in the 21st century. Therefore, only three of the listed meetings fall in this period.

Question 21

Consider the following statements comparing the National Integration Council (NIC) and the National Commission for Minorities (NCM):
1. The NIC is a constitutional body established to promote unity, whereas the NCM is a statutory body created by an Act of Parliament.
2. The Prime Minister serves as the ex-officio chairman of the NIC, while the NCM's Chairperson is nominated by the Central Government from among persons of eminence.
3. Both the NIC and NCM have faced significant challenges regarding the implementation of their recommendations, often being described as advisory bodies with limited enforcement power.
4. The NCM's jurisdiction was expanded in 1988 to include linguistic minorities, broadening its scope similar to the NIC's focus on linguism.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is incorrect; the NIC is not a constitutional body but was constituted following a government conference. Statement 2 is correct. Statement 3 is correct, as both bodies have been criticized for their advisory nature and lack of binding authority. Statement 4 is incorrect; the current affairs text explicitly states that linguistic minorities were excluded from the Minorities Commission's jurisdiction in 1988. Therefore, only two statements (2 and 3) are correct.

National Integration

Unlock All Questions