Question 1

Consider the following reasons given for the Constituent Assembly opting for the appointment of the Governor by the President instead of direct election:
1. The direct election of the governor is incompatible with the parliamentary system.
2. An elected governor would not be a neutral person and an impartial head.
3. The system of presidential nomination enables the Centre to maintain its control over the states.
4. The American model, where the Governor is directly elected, was seen as ideal for Indian federalism.
How many of the above reasons are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The Constituent Assembly chose the appointment of the Governor over direct election for several reasons, including the incompatibility with a parliamentary system, the potential for conflict with the Chief Minister, and the desire for a neutral head. The system also allows the Centre to maintain control. However, the American model of direct election was explicitly dropped in favor of the Canadian model of appointment.

Question 2

Statement I: The Governor is the chief executive head of the state but, like the President, is a nominal or constitutional head.
Statement II: The Supreme Court in 1979 held that the office of a governor is an employment under the Central government and is subordinate to it.

Accepted Answer

Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect. Statement I is correct as the Governor is the titular head of the state executive. Statement II is incorrect because the Supreme Court, in 1979, held that the office of a governor is an independent constitutional office and is not an employment under, nor subordinate to, the Central government.

Question 3

Consider the following statements regarding the appointment and conditions of the Governor's office:
1. The 7th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1956 facilitated the appointment of the same person as a governor for two or more states.
2. The Constitution mandates that the President must consult the Chief Minister of the state concerned before appointing a Governor.
3. A person must have completed the age of 35 years to be eligible for appointment as a Governor.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 2 is incorrect. The practice of the President consulting the Chief Minister of the concerned state before appointing a Governor is a convention that has developed over the years, not a constitutional mandate. Statements 1 and 3 are correct constitutional facts.

Question 4

With reference to the office of the Governor in the Indian states, consider the following statements:
1. The office of the governor has a dual role as the constitutional head of the state and as an agent of the Central government.
2. The Indian Constitution provides for an office of vice-governor in the states, similar to the Vice-President at the Centre.
3. The method of appointing a governor by the Centre was adopted from the Canadian model.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. The Governor indeed has a dual role. The method of appointment by the Centre is based on the Canadian model. However, the Constitution does not provide for an office of vice-governor in the states. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct, but statement 2 is incorrect.

Question 5

Consider the following statements about the state executive and the Governor's office:
1. The state executive consists of the governor, the chief minister, the council of ministers, and the advocate general of the state.
2. The Constitution lays down that a governor must be an outsider and not belong to the state where he is appointed.
3. The Governor is neither directly elected by the people nor indirectly elected by a specially constituted electoral college.
4. The office of governor of a state is an independent constitutional office and not under the control of the Central government.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only three statements. Statement 2 is incorrect; the requirement for a governor to be an outsider is a convention, not a constitutional provision. Statements 1, 3, and 4 are correct. The state executive's composition is as described. The Governor is appointed by the President. The Supreme Court has affirmed that the Governor's office is an independent constitutional office.

Question 6

Consider the following statements regarding the tenure of a Governor:

Statement I: The Constitution of India provides for a fixed term of office of five years for the Governor.
Statement II: A Governor holds office during the pleasure of the President and can be removed at any time without any grounds being laid down in the Constitution.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Statement I is incorrect but Statement II is correct. Statement I is incorrect because while a Governor's term is stated as five years, it is subject to the pleasure of the President, meaning there is no security of tenure or a fixed term. Statement II is correct as the President can remove a Governor at any time, and the Constitution does not specify the grounds for such removal.

Question 7

Consider the following statements regarding the emoluments and allowances of a Governor:
1. The emoluments and allowances of a Governor are determined by the Parliament.
2. When the same person is appointed as the governor of two or more states, the emoluments are shared by the states in a proportion determined by the Parliament.
3. The emoluments and allowances of a Governor can be diminished during his term of office.
How many of the statements given above are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only one. Only statement 1 is correct. The emoluments are determined by Parliament. Statement 2 is incorrect because when a governor serves two or more states, the sharing of emoluments is determined by the President, not Parliament. Statement 3 is incorrect as a governor's emoluments and allowances cannot be diminished during their term of office.

Question 8

With reference to the immunities enjoyed by a Governor, consider the following statements:
1. A Governor is immune from any criminal proceedings during their term of office, even in respect of personal acts.
2. Civil proceedings can be instituted against a Governor during their term of office in respect of personal acts after giving two months' notice.
3. A Governor cannot be arrested or imprisoned during their term of office.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

None of the above. All the statements are correct. A Governor enjoys personal immunity from legal liability for official acts and is immune from criminal proceedings for personal acts during their term. They cannot be arrested or imprisoned. However, civil proceedings concerning personal acts can be initiated after a two-month notice period. Since all statements are correct, the correct option is 'None of the above'.

Question 9

Consider the following items related to the office of the Governor:
1. The oath of office is administered by the Chief Justice of the concerned state high court.
2. A Governor whose term has expired may be reappointed in the same state.
3. If a member of a State Legislature is appointed as Governor, they are deemed to have vacated their seat upon entering the Governor's office.
4. In a contingency like the death of a sitting governor, the President may appoint the Chief Justice of the High Court to discharge the functions temporarily.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

All four. All four statements are correct. The oath is administered by the Chief Justice of the High Court. A governor can be reappointed. A legislator must vacate their seat upon becoming governor. The President can make provisions for contingencies, such as appointing the Chief Justice of the High Court to temporarily act as governor.

Question 10

With reference to the continuity of the Governor's office, consider the following statements:
1. A Governor can hold office beyond his term of five years until his successor assumes charge to prevent an interregnum.
2. The Constitution explicitly provides that in case of a vacancy due to the death of a Governor, the Chief Justice of the concerned state high court shall discharge the Governor's functions.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 only. Statement 1 is correct; to ensure there is always a governor, the incumbent can continue beyond the five-year term until a successor takes over. Statement 2 is incorrect; the Constitution does not explicitly provide this. Instead, it empowers the President to make provisions for any contingency not provided for in the Constitution, and appointing the Chief Justice is an example of how this power may be exercised.

Question 11

As per the constitutional provisions and subsequent amendments, the Governor is required to appoint a Tribal Welfare minister in
which of the following states?
1. Bihar
2. Chhattisgarh
3. Jharkhand
4. Madhya Pradesh
5. Odisha
How many of the states listed above are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only four states. The provision for appointing a Tribal Welfare minister applies to Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, and Odisha. The state of Bihar was explicitly excluded from this requirement by the 94th Amendment Act of 2006. Therefore, four of the listed states are correct.

Question 12

Consider the following statements:
Statement I: The Governor appoints the chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission.
Statement II: The chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

Accepted Answer

Statement I is correct but Statement II is incorrect.. Statement I is correct as the Governor does appoint the chairman and members of the State Public Service Commission (SPSC). However, Statement II is incorrect. To ensure their independence, the chairman and members of the SPSC can be removed only by the President of India, not by the Governor. They do not hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.

Question 13

When a bill, which is not a money bill, is sent to the Governor after being passed by the state legislature,
which of the following statements is/are NOT correct regarding his options?
1. He can return the bill for reconsideration, and if it is passed again by the legislature, he can again withhold his assent.
2. He is obligated to reserve any bill for the President's consideration if it is against the Directive Principles of State Policy.
3. He can give his assent, withhold his assent, or return the bill for reconsideration.

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statement 1 is incorrect; if a bill is passed again by the state legislature after reconsideration, the Governor must give his assent. He cannot withhold it again. Statement 2 is incorrect; reservation is obligatory only when the bill endangers the position of the state high court. For other reasons, like being against DPSP, the reservation is discretionary, not obligatory. Statement 3 correctly lists the Governor's primary options for a non-money bill. The question asks for the incorrect statements.

Question 14

Consider the following pairs regarding appointments and removals related to state administration:
1. Appointment of Advocate General : Governor
2. Removal of State Election Commissioner : Governor
3. Appointment of Vice-Chancellors of state universities : Governor
4. Removal of members of State Public Service Commission : Governor
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is correct; the Governor appoints the Advocate General. Pair 3 is correct; the Governor acts as the chancellor and appoints the vice-chancellors. Pair 2 is incorrect; the State Election Commissioner is removed in the same manner as a High Court judge, not directly by the Governor. Pair 4 is incorrect; members of the SPSC are removed by the President, not the Governor. Thus, only two pairs are correctly matched.

Question 15

With reference to the legislative powers of the Governor, consider the following statements:
1. The Governor nominates one-sixth of the members of the State Legislative Council from persons having special knowledge in fields including the cooperative movement.
2. The Governor can dissolve the State Legislative Council.
3. The Governor can promulgate ordinances only when both houses of the state legislature (where applicable) are not in session.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 only. Statement 1 is correct; the Governor nominates 1/6th of the members to the legislative council from persons with special knowledge in literature, science, art, cooperative movement, and social service. Statement 2 is incorrect; the Governor can dissolve the State Legislative Assembly, but the State Legislative Council is a permanent body and not subject to dissolution. Statement 3 is incorrect; the Governor can promulgate an ordinance when the state legislature (either one or both houses) is not in session.

Question 16

Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional position of the Governor:
1. The executive power of the state is vested in the Governor and must be exercised only through officers subordinate to him.
2. The council of ministers is collectively responsible to the legislative assembly of the state.
3. The Governor acts as a nominal executive, with the real executive being the council of ministers headed by the chief minister.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

2 and 3 only. Statement 1 is incorrect. Article 154 states that the executive power shall be exercised by the Governor either directly or through officers subordinate to him. Statements 2 and 3 are correct. Article 164 establishes the collective responsibility of the council of ministers to the state legislative assembly, which is the foundation of the parliamentary system. The Governor's role as a nominal head with the real executive power vested in the council of ministers is a key feature of this system.

Question 17

Consider the following actions by a Governor:
1. Reserving a bill for the consideration of the President.
2. Appointing a chief minister when no party has a clear-cut majority.
3. Seeking information from the chief minister regarding administrative matters.
4. Recommending the imposition of the President's Rule in the state.
How many of the above are examples of the Governor's 'constitutional discretion' as expressly mentioned in the Constitution?

Accepted Answer

Only three. The Constitution explicitly mentions certain discretionary powers for the Governor, known as constitutional discretion. These include reserving a bill for the President's consideration, recommending President's Rule, and seeking information from the chief minister. Appointing a chief minister in a hung assembly is an example of 'situational discretion', which is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but arises from the exigencies of a political situation. Therefore, only three of the listed actions are constitutional discretions.

Question 18

Statement I: The Constitution of India does not make it binding on the Governor to act on the aid and advice of the council of ministers in all matters.
Statement II: Unlike for the President, the Constitution explicitly envisages the possibility of the Governor acting in his discretion.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Both statements are correct. Statement I is true because, unlike the President (after the 42nd Amendment), there is no explicit provision making ministerial advice binding on the Governor. Statement II is also true, as Article 163(1) itself carves out an exception for the Governor to act in his discretion. Statement II provides the direct constitutional reason for Statement I; because the Governor has discretionary powers, the advice of the council of ministers cannot be binding in all circumstances.

Question 19

Consider the following statements comparing the constitutional positions of the Governor and the President:
1. The 42nd Constitutional Amendment made ministerial advice binding on the President, but no such provision was made for the Governor.
2. The Constitution explicitly provides for 'situational discretion' for both the President and the Governor.
3. If a question arises whether a matter falls within the Governor's discretion, the decision of the Governor is final.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 2 is incorrect. 'Situational discretion' is not explicitly provided for in the Constitution for either the President or the Governor. It is a hidden discretion derived from the exigencies of a prevailing political situation. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The 42nd Amendment's impact on the President's powers versus the Governor's is a key distinction, and the finality of the Governor's decision on discretionary matters is explicitly stated in the Constitution.

Question 20

Consider the following pairs:
1. Article 163 : Power of the Governor to grant pardons
2. Article 167 : Duties of the Chief Minister regarding furnishing of information to the Governor
3. Article 200 : Bills reserved by the Governor for consideration of the President
4. Article 213 : Power of Governor to promulgate ordinances
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is incorrect: Article 163 relates to the Council of Ministers aiding and advising the Governor; the pardoning power is under Article 161. Pair 3 is incorrect: Article 200 deals with the Governor's assent to bills, while Article 201 specifically deals with bills reserved for the President's consideration. Pairs 2 and 4 are correctly matched. Article 167 outlines the CM's duty to inform the Governor, and Article 213 grants the Governor the power to promulgate ordinances. Thus, only two pairs are correct.

Question 21

With reference to the pardoning powers of the President and the Governor in India, consider the following statements:
1. While the President can pardon a death sentence, the Governor's power is limited to suspending, remitting, or commuting it.
2. The Governor does not possess any power with regard to punishments or sentences awarded by a court-martial.
3. Both the President and the Governor can pardon, reprieve, or remit punishments for offences against their respective central and state laws.
How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

All three. All three statements are correct. Statement 1 is accurate as the text specifies that only the President can pardon a death sentence, while the Governor can suspend, remit, or commute it. Statement 2 is correct as the text explicitly states the Governor has no power over court-martial punishments, a power reserved for the President. Statement 3 is also correct, as the President's power applies to Central laws and the Governor's to state laws.

Question 22

Consider the following statements regarding the assent to an ordinary bill:
1. The President has three alternatives, whereas the Governor has four alternatives.
2. If a bill is returned for reconsideration and passed again by the legislature, both the President and the Governor must give their assent.
3. The power to reserve a bill for the consideration of the President is a key difference in the procedural options available to the Governor compared to the President.
Which of the statements given above are correct?

Accepted Answer

1, 2 and 3. All three statements are correct. Statement 1 is factually correct as the President has three options (assent, withhold, return), while the Governor has a fourth option (reserve for President). Statement 2 is also correct; the text confirms that upon reconsideration and re-passage, both must give their assent, making their initial veto only 'suspensive'. Statement 3 correctly identifies the reservation of a bill as the unique, fourth alternative available only to the Governor.

Question 23

Consider the following statements regarding the ordinance-making power of the President and the Governor:
1. The President is barred from promulgating an ordinance if only one of the two Houses of Parliament is not in session.
2. The ordinance-making power of the Governor is a discretionary power, exercised independently of the state Council of Ministers.
3. An ordinance issued by the Governor is subject to the same limitations as an act of the state legislature.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 2 only. Statements 1 and 2 are not correct. Statement 1 is incorrect because the text states an ordinance can be promulgated when 'either one or both' Houses are not in session. The text clarifies that a law needs both houses, which is why an ordinance is needed if one is not in session. Statement 2 is incorrect as the text explicitly mentions that the Governor's ordinance-making power is not discretionary and is executed on the advice of the Council of Ministers. Statement 3 is correct, as the text states that an ordinance is subject to the same limitations as an act of the respective legislature.

Question 24

With reference to Money Bills,
which of the following statements is correct?

Accepted Answer

The Governor can reserve a money bill for the President's consideration, an option not available to the President.. Statement (c) is correct. The Governor has three alternatives for a money bill: give assent, withhold assent, or reserve the bill for the President's consideration. The President only has two alternatives: give assent or withhold assent. The President cannot return a money bill for reconsideration, nor can he reserve it for any other authority. Therefore, the option to reserve the bill is unique to the Governor in this context.

Question 25

Consider the following pairs comparing the powers of the President and the Governor:
1. Action on Ordinary Bill : Governor possesses a suspensive veto, but the President does not.
2. Action on Money Bill : Both can withhold their assent to the bill.
3. Pardoning Power : Both can commute a sentence of death.
4. Ordinance Power : Co-extensive with the legislative power of their respective legislatures.
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only three pairs. Three pairs are correctly matched. Pair 1 is incorrect because the text states that both the President and the Governor enjoy a 'suspensive veto' on ordinary bills. Pair 2 is correct as withholding assent is an option for both the President and the Governor with regard to money bills. Pair 3 is correct because while only the President can pardon a death sentence, the text explicitly states the Governor 'can suspend, remit, or commute a death sentence'. Pair 4 is correct as the text states that the ordinance-making power for both is co-extensive with the legislative power of the Parliament and the state legislature, respectively. Thus, pairs 2, 3, and 4 are correct.

Question 26

Considering the recent debates surrounding the Governor's role, such as the alleged use of a 'pocket veto' in states like Tamil Nadu, analyze the following actions:

1. Reserving a bill passed by the state legislature for the consideration of the President.
2. Dismissing the council of ministers when it is unable to prove the confidence of the state legislative assembly.
3. Appointing a Chief Minister when no party has a clear-cut majority after an election.
4. Withholding assent to a bill passed by the legislature without returning it for reconsideration.

How many of the above are generally considered to be within the discretionary powers (either constitutional or situational) of the Governor?

Accepted Answer

All four. All four actions fall under the Governor's discretionary powers. 
1. Reservation of a bill for the President's consideration (Article 201) is an explicit constitutional discretion.
2. Dismissal of the council of ministers upon losing majority is a situational discretion, as affirmed in the S.R. Bommai case (1994).
3. Appointment of a Chief Minister in a hung assembly is a key situational discretion.
4. Article 200 gives the Governor the options to give assent, withhold assent, or return a bill. Withholding assent is a discretionary power, the exercise of which has become controversial, as seen in recent current affairs, but it remains a constitutional option available to the Governor.

Question 27

Considering the recent incidents in Tamil Nadu and Kerala regarding the Governor's address, and the constitutional framework for the Governor's powers, analyze the following statements:

1. The Governor's address under Article 176 is a policy statement of the elected government, and any deviation from the text approved by the Council of Ministers is a constitutional impropriety.
2. The Governor can use their constitutional discretion of 'seeking information from the chief minister' (Article 167) to justify altering the speech prepared by the Council of Ministers for the legislative address.
3. The Supreme Court's ruling in Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab (1974) supports the view that the Governor's address is a ceremonial function bound by the aid and advice of the ministers.
4. The finality of the Governor's decision on discretionary matters under Article 163(2) empowers them to omit portions of the address they personally disagree with, as it becomes a discretionary act.

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statements 1 and 3 are correct. The Governor's address under Article 176 is a constitutional duty to present the policies of the elected government, not a personal speech. The Supreme Court in Shamsher Singh (1974) and subsequent judgments has clarified that the Governor acts as a constitutional head on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, except in explicitly defined discretionary areas. The address is not one of them. Statement 2 is incorrect because seeking information is a separate power and does not grant the authority to unilaterally alter the government's policy address. Statement 4 is an incorrect application of Article 163(2); the Supreme Court has limited the scope of discretion, and the legislative address is not considered a discretionary power. Therefore, only two statements are correct.

Question 28

Match the constitutional provisions/judgments (List I) with their correct implications regarding the Governor's role (List II), especially in the context of the legislative address controversy.

List I (Provision/Judgment)
A. Article 176
B. Nabam Rebia case (2016)
C. 42nd Constitutional Amendment
D. Article 163

List II (Implication)
1. Made ministerial advice binding on the President, creating a key distinction with the Governor's position.
2. Mandates the Governor's address to the legislature to inform it of the 'causes of its summons', which is interpreted as the government's policy statement.
3. Establishes the general rule that the Governor acts on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, with an exception for discretionary functions.
4. Ruled that the Governor's discretionary powers are strictly limited and must be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution.

Accepted Answer

A-2, B-4, C-1, D-3. The correct matches are:
A. Article 176 directly mandates the Governor's address at the commencement of the first session each year, which serves as the policy statement of the government. (A-2)
B. The Nabam Rebia (2016) judgment by a Constitution Bench clarified that the Governor's discretionary powers are not wide-ranging but are strictly limited to what is explicitly provided in the Constitution. (B-4)
C. The 42nd Amendment (1976) made ministerial advice binding on the President, but no such explicit provision was made for the Governor, which is a key point of difference in their constitutional positions. (C-1)
D. Article 163 is the foundational provision that requires the Governor to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, while also carving out the exception for matters of discretion. (D-3)

Question 29

In the context of the recent debates surrounding the Governor's address to state legislatures, which of the following statements regarding the Governor's constitutional position is **NOT** correct?

Accepted Answer

The Governor's address under Article 176 is considered a matter falling under their situational discretion, allowing them to edit the content prepared by the Council of Ministers.. Statement (b) is incorrect. The current affairs storyline, supported by constitutional conventions and Supreme Court judgments (like Shamsher Singh), clarifies that the Governor's address under Article 176 is a constitutional duty performed on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. It is a policy statement of the elected government, not an area for the Governor's personal or situational discretion. Statements (a), (c), and (d) are correct reflections of the Governor's constitutional position as described in the provided static and current affairs content.

Governor

Unlock All Questions