Question 1

With reference to the 91st Amendment Act, 2003, consider the following provisions:
1. The total number of ministers in the Union Council of Ministers shall not exceed 15 per cent of the total strength of the Lok Sabha.
2. A member disqualified on the ground of defection shall also be disqualified to hold any remunerative political post.
3. The provision exempting defectors from disqualification in case of a 'split' was deleted.
4. The number of ministers in a state, including the Chief Minister, shall not be less than 12.
How many of the above provisions were introduced by the 91st Amendment Act, 2003?

Accepted Answer

All four. The 91st Amendment Act of 2003 introduced all four provisions: it capped the size of the Council of Ministers at 15% of the house strength (with a minimum of 12 in states), debarred defectors from holding ministerial or remunerative political posts, and crucially, it removed the 'split' provision (where one-third of members could split from a party) from the Tenth Schedule.

Question 2

Consider the following statements regarding the role of the Presiding Officer in defection cases:
Statement I: The decision of the Presiding Officer of a House on a question of disqualification under the Tenth Schedule is subject to judicial review.
Statement II: The Supreme Court, in the Kihoto Hollohan case, held that the Presiding Officer functions as a tribunal while deciding cases under the Tenth Schedule.

Accepted Answer

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.. Both statements are correct. The Supreme Court in the Kihoto Hollohan case (1993) declared that the Presiding Officer's decision is subject to judicial review. The reasoning provided by the court was that the Presiding Officer functions as a tribunal in this capacity, and therefore, their decision is not immune from judicial scrutiny on grounds of mala fides, perversity, etc. Thus, Statement II provides the correct legal reasoning for Statement I.

Question 3

Consider the following pairs regarding disqualification under the Tenth Schedule:
1. Independent Member : Disqualified if joins any political party at any time after election.
2. Nominated Member : Disqualified if joins any political party within six months of taking a seat in the House.
3. Party Member : Disqualified if votes contrary to party direction without prior permission, and the act is not condoned within 15 days.
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is correct: An independent member is disqualified if they join any political party after their election. Pair 3 is correct: A party member is disqualified if they defy the party whip and this action is not condoned by the party within 15 days. Pair 2 is incorrect: A nominated member is allowed to join a political party within six months of taking their seat; they are disqualified only if they join a party *after* the expiry of these six months.

Question 4

Consider the following statements about the anti-defection law:
1. The Tenth Schedule was added to the Constitution by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985.
2. A member who, after being elected as the presiding officer, voluntarily gives up party membership is exempted from disqualification.
3. The 91st Amendment Act, 2003, introduced the provision that disqualification would not apply in the case of a 'split' involving one-third of a legislature party.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

3 only. Statement 3 is incorrect. The 91st Amendment Act of 2003 did not introduce the provision for splits; it in fact deleted it. The provision allowing for splits by one-third of members was part of the original 52nd Amendment Act but was removed to prevent bulk defections. Statements 1 and 2 are correct facts related to the anti-defection law.

Question 5

The anti-defection law has been criticised on several grounds. Consider the following criticisms:
1. It makes no distinction between dissent and defection, thereby curbing the legislator's freedom of conscience.
2. It discriminates between independent and nominated members regarding their ability to join a political party after election.
3. It vests adjudicatory authority in the presiding officer, who may lack legal knowledge and impartiality.
4. It legalised wholesale defections while banning only retail defections.
How many of the above are valid criticisms mentioned in the context of the anti-defection law's operation?

Accepted Answer

All four. All four statements represent valid criticisms of the anti-defection law. The law is criticised for stifling dissent (1), treating independent and nominated members differently (2), giving quasi-judicial powers to a potentially biased presiding officer (3), and historically allowing 'wholesale' defections (mergers) while banning individual ones, a point often made before the 'split' provision was removed (4).

Question 6

Consider the following pairs:
Trade Union : Political Affiliation
1. All-India Trade Union Congress (AITUC) : Communist Party of India (CPI)
2. Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC) : Indian National Congress
3. Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) : Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
4. Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS) : Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPM)
How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only three pairs. The Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS) is affiliated with the Socialists, not the CPM. The Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is affiliated with the CPM. The other three pairs are correctly matched as per their political affiliations.

Question 7

Consider the following statements regarding pressure groups:
1. Pressure groups are distinct from political parties as they neither contest elections nor aim to capture political power.
2. The primary method used by pressure groups to influence policy is called 'electioneering', which involves persuading public officers to adopt favorable policies.
3. The term 'pressure group' originated in the United States of America.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. Statement 2 is incorrect. The technique of persuading public officers to adopt and enforce policies is known as 'lobbying'. 'Electioneering' is the technique of trying to place favorably disposed persons in public office. Statements 1 and 3 are correct descriptions of pressure groups.

Question 8

With reference to business groups in India, consider the following statements:
1. The Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industry of India (ASSOCHAM) primarily represents foreign British capital.
2. The All-India Manufacturers Organisation (AIMO) is concerned with the interests of major industrial and trading entities.
3. The Federation of Indian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) is considered one of the most powerful and sophisticated pressure groups in the country.
Which of the statements given above is/are NOT correct?

Accepted Answer

2 only. Statement 2 is not correct. The All-India Manufacturers Organisation (AIMO) raises the concerns of the medium-sized industry, not major industrial entities. Statement 1 is correct as the text states ASSOCHAM represents foreign British capital. Statement 3 is also correct as business groups are described as the most powerful and sophisticated, with FICCI being a prime example.

Question 9

Consider the following organizations:
1. Narmada Bachao Andolan
2. Nava Nirman Samithi of Gujarat
3. All Assam Students Union
4. United Mizo Federal Organisation
How many of the above are classified as Anomic Groups?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Anomic pressure groups involve spontaneous breakthroughs like riots and demonstrations. Based on the classification provided, Nava Nirman Samithi of Gujarat and All Assam Students Union are listed as anomic groups. Narmada Bachao Andolan is an ideology-based group, and the United Mizo Federal Organisation is a tribal organisation. Therefore, only two of the organizations are classified as anomic groups.

Question 10

Which of the following statements accurately describes the characteristics of 'Anomic Groups' as observed by Almond and Powell?
1. They represent spontaneous, often unorganized, breakthroughs into the political system like riots and demonstrations.
2. They are formed to pursue a particular ideology, such as environmental protection or civil liberties.
3. They are a result of alienation from a political system that denies legitimacy to particularistic demands.
Select the correct answer using the code given below:

Accepted Answer

1 and 3 only. According to Almond and Powell, anomic pressure groups are spontaneous breakthroughs like riots and demonstrations. This happens when interest groups feel alienated from the political system because their demands are denied legitimacy. Statement 2 describes ideology-based groups, not anomic groups. Therefore, statements 1 and 3 are correct.

Question 11

Considering the evolution of the anti-defection law and recent judicial interventions, evaluate the correctness of the following statements regarding the powers and limitations of the Presiding Officer:

1. The 91st Amendment Act, 2003, strengthened the Presiding Officer's hand by removing the exemption from disqualification in case of a 'split' by one-third of a party's members.
2. The Supreme Court, in the Kihoto Hollohan case (1992), established that the Presiding Officer's decision is final and cannot be questioned in any court, thereby ensuring swift action.
3. Recent Supreme Court judgments, such as in the Keisham Meghachandra Singh case (2020) and Padi Kaushik Reddy case (2025), have criticized delays and suggested a three-month timeframe for Presiding Officers to decide on disqualification petitions.
4. The 2nd Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) recommended reinforcing the Presiding Officer's role by granting them powers similar to a tribunal under the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT).

How many of the above statements are correct?

Accepted Answer

Only two. Statement 1 is correct as the 91st Amendment deleted the provision that protected defectors in case of a split. Statement 3 is also correct, reflecting the current judicial stance on timely decisions by the Speaker. Statement 2 is incorrect; the Kihoto Hollohan case declared that the Speaker's decision is subject to judicial review, striking down the provision of finality. Statement 4 is incorrect; the 2nd ARC recommended shifting the decision-making power from the Speaker to the President/Governor acting on the Election Commission's advice, not reinforcing the Speaker's role.

Question 12

Considering the recent demand for 'Bhil Pradesh' and the provided text on pressure groups, how many of the following statements are correct?

1. The movement for Bhil Pradesh can be classified as an activity of a tribal pressure group, similar in nature to the All-India Jharkhand group mentioned in the text.
2. The emphasis on the common Bhili language and cultural homogeneity as a reason for the new state aligns the movement with the characteristics of a linguistic pressure group.
3. Should the movement involve spontaneous demonstrations or riots, it would exemplify the characteristics of an 'anomic pressure group' as described by Almond and Powell.
4. The ultimate goal of creating a new state means the movement is acting as a political party, as it seeks to capture political power.

Accepted Answer

Only three. Statement 1 is correct as the Bhil Pradesh demand is a tribal movement seeking political reorganization, akin to the tribal organizations listed. Statement 2 is correct because the demand is explicitly based on cultural and linguistic homogeneity (Bhili language), a characteristic of linguistic pressure groups. Statement 3 is correct as it accurately applies the definition of anomic pressure groups (spontaneous breakthrough into the political system) to a hypothetical scenario within the movement. Statement 4 is incorrect because the static text clearly distinguishes pressure groups from political parties, stating that pressure groups 'neither contest elections nor try to capture political power' in the way parties do. Their goal is to influence government policy, which can include state formation, not to form a government themselves.

Question 13

Considering the political affiliations of various pressure groups in India, as described in the provided text, and the political career of Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee with the CPM, examine the following pairs:

1. Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) : Communist Party of India (Marxist)
2. Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) : Indian National Congress
3. All India Students Federation (AISF) : Communist Party of India
4. Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC) : Bharatiya Janata Party

How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?

Accepted Answer

Only two pairs. Pair 1 is correct; the static text explicitly states that the Centre of Indian Trade Unions (CITU) is affiliated with the CPM, the party of Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee. Pair 3 is correct; the All India Students Federation (AISF) is affiliated with the CPI. Pair 2 is incorrect; the Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) is affiliated with the BJP, not the Congress. Pair 4 is incorrect; the Indian National Trade Union Congress (INTUC) is affiliated with the Congress, not the BJP. Therefore, only two pairs are correctly matched.

Anti-Defection Law & Pressure Groups

Unlock All Questions